Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Terrestrial Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-04-2011, 07:51 PM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
For lack of a Macro Lens

Hi All,

I really want to get a Macro Lens but until I get one I will continue to try to get good insect photo's with what I have.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (DSC_9131.JPG)
199.6 KB33 views
Click for full-size image (DSC_9132.JPG)
177.2 KB27 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2011, 08:45 PM
Nico13's Avatar
Nico13 (Ken)
Galaxy Hunting

Nico13 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Geelong region.
Posts: 947
Hi Warren,

A couple of pretty reasonable shots there with what you have.
What lens etc did you use for those?

I found if you have a short tele lens say around 135-150mm that has a good close focus range is the next best thing to a macro.
One bonus is they give you a bit more DOF without having to close the appature right down.

I have a 135mm f2.8 prime lens that I'd been using for just this purpose and it peformed very well.
I then purchased a 100mm f2.8 macro that was highly recommended and was a little underwhelmed by it.
Mind you it is a very good lens but the 135 is better for grabbing those quick shots while the 100 macro is better if you have time to setup for the shots.

ken.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2011, 08:59 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
The St Andrews Cross spiders were my first targets in macro too.
I used to call the Jupiter spiders because of the markings on their back.
Lovely shots Warren.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2011, 09:13 PM
shelltree's Avatar
shelltree (Shelley)
Stargazer

shelltree is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 842
Must...not...hallucinate...spiders. .. Good going in capturing it with its prey
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-04-2011, 09:36 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Doesn't look like you need one Warren - very nice!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-2011, 05:56 AM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico13 View Post
Hi Warren,

A couple of pretty reasonable shots there with what you have.
What lens etc did you use for those?

I found if you have a short tele lens say around 135-150mm that has a good close focus range is the next best thing to a macro.
One bonus is they give you a bit more DOF without having to close the appature right down.

I have a 135mm f2.8 prime lens that I'd been using for just this purpose and it peformed very well.
I then purchased a 100mm f2.8 macro that was highly recommended and was a little underwhelmed by it.
Mind you it is a very good lens but the 135 is better for grabbing those quick shots while the 100 macro is better if you have time to setup for the shots.

ken.
Thanks Rowland,Shelley,JJJ,Ken

Ken, it is a NIKON DX Nikkor 18-135mm 1.35-56g ED
f/5.6
1/60 sec.
ISO-100
Focal Length 105mm

Manual Focus
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement