ICEINSPACE
|
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Gibbous 83.3%
|
|
10-01-2011, 09:55 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Italy - Turin
Posts: 771
|
|
|
First 2 image of 2011
Happy new year to all, with some delay 
The first 2 image of the new year for me:
http://www.starkeeper.it/M82.htm
http://www.starkeeper.it/IC405_RC.htm
Taken with GSO RC 10" reduced to F5.2 and Atik4000 LE Mono from italian Alps.
Thanks for looking.
Ciao,
Leo
|
10-01-2011, 10:13 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
|
|
|
Very nice Leo well done
|
10-01-2011, 10:16 PM
|
 |
Like to learn
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
|
|
|
Beautiful images !
|
10-01-2011, 10:48 PM
|
 |
Sandy Ridge Observatory
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
|
|
|
Impressive Leo! You must be pleased with the GSO. I especially like the Starburst Galaxy.
Chris
|
10-01-2011, 10:56 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Italy - Turin
Posts: 771
|
|
|
Thank so much for your replies ...
Leo
|
11-01-2011, 02:00 AM
|
 |
Love reflection Nebs !
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Streaky Bay
Posts: 1,070
|
|
|
Leo,
These are some of the best images I've seen taken with a GSO 10" scope!
You've certainly got it dialed in to perfection.
It's hard to tell this scope from the hugely priced RC's in similar aperture... the stars and the refraction spikes tell the story!!
Loved your Flaming Neb image.
Very well processed and good saturation in your colours.
Top shelf.
Rich
|
11-01-2011, 02:16 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Italy - Turin
Posts: 771
|
|
|
Rich, i tried to do my best ... fighting with cheap scope, cheap CCD and medium quality sky . I know my picture its so far from the owner of the best RC but i'm happy to go nearly as i can ...
|
11-01-2011, 12:57 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Nothing wrong with those piccies, Leo. They're superb!!!
The gear you have maybe mid range stuff, but the results most certainly are not. In any case, when you don't have megabucks to spend on top of the line equipment, you can only do as good as your equipment and skills level allows. It's pretty obvious from this that those skill levels are very high
|
11-01-2011, 01:02 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
|
|
Definitely nothing wrong with those pictures, nice clear and very little noise, well done 
|
11-01-2011, 01:44 PM
|
 |
ze frogginator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
|
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: busselton WA
Posts: 738
|
|
|
excellent images.what focal reducer did you use thanks
|
11-01-2011, 04:04 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
|
|
|
Excellent images! Well done Leo.
Steve
|
11-01-2011, 04:09 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 933
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonardo70
Rich, i tried to do my best ... fighting with cheap scope, cheap CCD and medium quality sky . I know my picture its so far from the owner of the best RC but i'm happy to go nearly as i can ...
|
Hi Leonardo, both are extremely beautiful images, with M82 being superlative in my opinion. I don't actually believe your results would be any better using a more blazoned ota, I have no information on better pictures of the same targets taken through a 10"
Keep posting here your images so we can enjoy some of your work!
Clear Skies
Marco
|
11-01-2011, 08:15 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Italy - Turin
Posts: 771
|
|
|
Really happy about your replies ... many thanks to all... in this 2 picture there's a lot of work and passion ...
Dear Suma, The reducer is the CCDT67 from AstroPhysics with dedicated 2" nose AP16T, i choose a 106mm distance that give to me a reduction factor of 0.66x. The flat field are at limit of my sensor, i founded necessary collimation of focuser (not the original) to light axis with a really good laser to achieve the best result in conjuction of takahashi telecollimator. The full illuminated field for 106mm is 28mm circle ... so you cannot use a bigger CCD.
Ciao,
Leo
|
11-01-2011, 09:10 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 773
|
|
|
Loved the images, Leo!
The flaming star nebula has so much depth.
Cheers,
Alex
|
11-01-2011, 09:42 PM
|
 |
accepts all donations
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
|
|
|
Lovely shots well done
Que Bella!
frank
|
11-01-2011, 09:58 PM
|
 |
Really just a beginner
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,045
|
|
|
Excellent work - you've certainly done your homework on the flattener and paid attention to all the details.
DT
|
12-01-2011, 12:27 AM
|
 |
Highest Observatory in Oz
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
|
|
I think your equipment is nothing to sneeze at Mr Da Vinci!  Looks to be working very well! :-)
Lovey images and well done on getting Ha as well as Lum, this has payed off for sure!
Finally, thankyou for not using too much artificial smoothing, nothing looks worse than over smoothed images, the level of noise in your images is very natural.
Bellisimo
Mike
|
12-01-2011, 01:12 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Italy - Turin
Posts: 771
|
|
|
Many thanks to all ....
Mike thanks for your comment ... i use a noise (ninja) reduction with 2 different masks in PS but so light ... ccdstack with rejection do a very good job on stacking.
|
24-01-2011, 11:09 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: rome
Posts: 114
|
|
|
M82 is superb technically perfect.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:27 PM.
|
|
