Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
Sorry Alex .. what's this about the hunt for the truth ?
This implies that what we have currently, is a lie.
There is no truth in Science. Perhaps in your old profession there is truth.
Which would serve to demonstrate that the driving motivation in Science is different from the platform you're pitching from. Also, the application of such methodologies, (derived from this tenet), may not be appropriate in the field of Science.
Cheers
|
No no no there is no such implication intended ..substitute maybe "hunt for more knowledge" so please see my statements in that context rather than me being at odds..you must know by now I dont hint but will openly call things the way I see them. I would not call anyone a liar because their view may be different.
Which old profession? anyways please dont brand me with behavior found in others or you may be mislead. When in law I was placed on the "outside" because I was always suggesting how we could make things simpler and more efficient... It may come as a shock but lawyers dont really want to make conveyancing easier ..the Torrens title system lends itself to the elimination of so much crap associated with conveyancing but certain folk dont want it that way...why one can only wonder.
I think you confuse me with someone else

I am still trying to understand how others see me as clearly it is different to the way I see myself...
Science is one step at a time marching always in step with the demands of scientific method.
I see myself as being rather pedantic about scientific method being followed...some of my criticisms are because I perceive scientific method is passed by...of course it does not happen at the coal face but one can easily get such an impression when only able to view journalists reports on very complex matters.
This does not mean that entertaining ideas must be eliminated in my view.
Have a great day

.
alex

