Hi John,
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer
Hi Malcolm,
You need to use more power on the homonculus. On nights of good seeing it is not uncommon for me to observe it at 500X plus and on rarer occasions at 700X to 800X. The view will hold up better at high magnifications than planetary views in variable seeing conditions.
At high power in a decent aperture scope it is fairly easy to see detail within both lobes of the nebula. Both lobes actually have holes in them and their structure has changed fairly significantly in the past 2 or 3 years.
Cheers,
John B
|
I'm glad you said that John about there being change particularly over the last few years. I look forward every jear in Dec/Jan to getting a look to see what has happened over the last few months it has been scraping along the southern horizon. Personally I like the view at x371 best when the seeing is up to it -- and it rarely is where I observe.
The lobe pointing obliquely away from us has about halved in brightness over the last few years and it's holes on the side (cutaway's at the sides making the bottom lobe look anchor-shaped) appear to have become bigger and darker. The brighter lobe is becoming more knotty and the central region (the "waist" between the lobes) is brighter as is the central star.
IAU circular 9103 issued on 1 January 2010 includes some very accurate photometry performed at Perth Observatory by David Frew and others that puts the magnitude of the central star (Eta itself) plus the Homunculus surrounding it at 4.65 in mid-November. I estimated it visually on 13th December 2009 at between 4.35 and 4.45 (the lower being the more likely). It had been estimated visually in early October 2009 at about 4.1. There were several visual extimates around the 4.5-4.6 mark in October-Nov. It just doesn't seem that long ago it was about mag 6.5-7.0 -- guess I'm showing my age!
This increase and variability in visual brightness is
not necessarily evidence that "she's about to blow" but more likely that Eta is finally starting to clear the Homunculus away and shine out of it -- rather than through it.
It would appear therefore that as the material is being cleared out, there is less infrared and more of the visual and shorter wavelengths getting out. Change is occurring very quickly (on astronomical time-scales) and it is always interesting to watch.
And yes Richard, it is that yellowish star -- you need to use more magnification to see it's true nature. One of the most wonderful objects in the sky!!
More general info:
http://etacar.umn.edu/etainfo/history/
Best,
Les D