Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:15 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
M78 Tec180fl

3 very clear nights this weekend and good seeing on 2 of them.

M78, an interesting reflection nebula with some dust and emission nebula nearby.

TEC180mm fluorite, field flattener, Apogee U16M camera at -10C (it was a hot night), Baader LRGB filters, Tak NJP mount, Robofocus digital focuser seeing was average and improved to reasonable. Some of the subs were taken the next night under good seeing (60mins blue, 30 mins green and 10 mins red).

LRGB 60 60 60 60. From my dark site observatory in remote NSW.

http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/108830442/large small 1200 x 1210


http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/ima...30707/original large 2000 x 2017

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:52 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Top image Greg. Great detail and very sharp.

Interested in your thoughts on the Baader LRGB filters. I recall a thread some time ago suggesting they were not much good although this image has me believing otherwise.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:54 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Very Very nice... as good an M78 as I've seen anywhere!

Top job.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:04 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Thumbs up

WOW That is nice Greg. As sharp as a TEC. I was going say a Tak But thought better of it.

Really is the best image I have seen of this area. Beautiful
Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:07 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
WOW, THAT IS AMAZING. Scott alder i think took a dslr image of that area a few weeks ago but this is just breathtaking
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:07 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Ooooh Aaaaah!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:07 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059 View Post
Top image Greg. Great detail and very sharp.

Interested in your thoughts on the Baader LRGB filters. I recall a thread some time ago suggesting they were not much good although this image has me believing otherwise.

Peter
I was speaking to Peter Ward earlier today via pm regarding filters for a mono CCD, and he recommended Baader to me.. Can't be bad I figure..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:20 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Smile

Another exceptional image....this is the stuff worthy of inclusion in textbooks of astronomy and imaging. Great work
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:24 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Smile

Just out of curiosity, what's the resolution of your Apogee per px?? Just want to do some quick calculations
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:25 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059 View Post
Top image Greg. Great detail and very sharp.

Interested in your thoughts on the Baader LRGB filters. I recall a thread some time ago suggesting they were not much good although this image has me believing otherwise.

Peter
The Baaders are interesting. They give very good red response compared to other filters. They don't have many reflections.

But I find the colour combine with them can be a bit difficult. They are not 1:1:1 exposure time as advertised with my system. I was advised by another imager for his similar setup it was 1.3:1:1.9. That helped and the colour seemed fine. I also find I need to normalise the RGB before combining otherwise I can get unusual colours and effects. I did not have to do that with Astrodons and my STL11. I have to do that with the Astronomiks as well.

I got them because of the reflection problems a lot of filters were giving with the large chipped 16803 cameras. You have to use a flattener with almost any scope (RCOS excepted perhaps) with these large chips and reflections from some brands were horrendous.

So these filters are good once you know their idiosyncrasies but not as user friendly as the Astrodons. I was thinking of getting Astrodon Gen 11 filters.
If they don't have reflection problems then the colour combine and colour is very easy.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:34 PM
Rigel003's Avatar
Rigel003 (Graeme)
Registered User

Rigel003 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,082
Stunning photo Greg, and it looks like the new scope is just fantastic. No hint of colour at all that I can see. I've always thought that m78 was a pretty boring object but it certainly isn't in this shot.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:40 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Very Very nice... as good an M78 as I've seen anywhere!

Thanks Alex!

Top job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
WOW That is nice Greg. As sharp as a TEC. I was going say a Tak But thought better of it.

Hehehe Taks are cool too.

Really is the best image I have seen of this area. Beautiful
Well done.
Why thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
WOW, THAT IS AMAZING. Scott alder i think took a dslr image of that area a few weeks ago but this is just breathtaking
Thanks Houghy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie View Post
Ooooh Aaaaah!
Thanks Jeanette

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
I was speaking to Peter Ward earlier today via pm regarding filters for a mono CCD, and he recommended Baader to me.. Can't be bad I figure..
Overall they are good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Another exceptional image....this is the stuff worthy of inclusion in textbooks of astronomy and imaging. Great work
Wow, thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Just out of curiosity, what's the resolution of your Apogee per px?? Just want to do some quick calculations
1.47 arc seconds per pixel. The scope is 180mm, 1260mm focal length and F7. The camera has a KAF16803 chip which has 9um pixels 4096 x 4096 pixels in a chip that is 36.9mm square (quite large hence the need for 50mm square filters and a 50mm square filter wheel).

The camera comes standard with the chip having no cover slip (slightly more QE and less reflections and slightly sharper). The QE of the chip is around 60+ % and it is quite sensitive in the Ha band. It is also very low noisehe chip tends to show a slight amp glow on the sides of the image but this processes out and is seen more in the bias frame. These chips though tend to get a line or two from hot pixels like the STL11. The lines tend to disappear with lower temps. -10C is as low as I have used it as it was a hot night. I only get 1 line really and it processes out with accurate flats and bias. Flats are more sensitive and a bit harder to achieve with the large chip camera. I also found that I got a very even flat using the Apogee and an adpater at the correct metal back distance from the flattener (Precise Parts) without the FLI PDF focuser in the imaging train. I installed a robofocus which helped enormously on getting accurate focus. The Starlight focuser which is adjustable, tends to slip a bit using the microfocuser under the weight of the camera gear. Adjusting the focuser is not obvious as to how to do it.

The Apogee camera just got a new firmware update that speeds up the cooling time which is still slow compared to other brands but much better than what it was (at least 45 minutes). Now its about 30 minutes or so. My FLI camera slams down to -35C in about 2.5 minutes. The cooling of the Apogee is the only area I think the camera could be improved on as it performs great in all other ways. It goes 36 or 37C below ambient not 40C as advertised. But it has a buffer and keeps itself going once started without need of the computer so if it accidentally disconnects from the computer - no worries, reconnect it and no settings are lost and it is still going. I like that a lot. The FLI camera is the same that way.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-02-2009, 12:04 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Smile

At 1.47" per pixel, the smallest object you're seeing/imaging (at an accepted distance to M78 of 1600ly) is 0.0114ly in size or 721.05AU

Last edited by renormalised; 04-02-2009 at 12:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-02-2009, 12:06 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
At 1.47" per pixel, the smallest object you're seeing/imaging (at an accepted distance to M78 of 1600ly) is 0.0114ly in size or 721.05AU

Interesting. That's pretty small in the cosmic scale of things.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-02-2009, 12:17 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
That's pretty nice Greg, a lovely big FOV It is such a majestic and mysterious object and you have captured this pretty well. I hope to image it too but maybe not till next year now?

Lovely dot like stars all over the field too and no out of field star reflections, in this shot atleast, so looking good.

I see you are getting the same small halos around the brighter stars like I do with the AP..? This article at Astrodon suggests these are from light refecting off the cover slip and back to the chip but you say the Apogee has no cover slip..? Are you sure?

http://www.astrodon.com/articles_faq...1,355,49#STL11

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-02-2009, 12:32 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
I see you are getting the same small halos around the brighter stars like I do with the AP..? This article at Astrodon suggests these are from light refecting off the cover slip and back to the chip but you say the Apogee has no cover slip..? Are you sure?

http://www.astrodon.com/articles_faq...1,355,49#STL11

Mike[/quote]

Hi Mike,

Yeah there are a few there but not really that bright and they don't particularly bother me. I get a few with the Astronomiks as well but really pretty minor. They both seem to perform well in this regard.

I posted the question on the Apogee group to make sure there is no cover slip but I did read that in a post a long time ago when I was evaluating the cameras.

The reflections are almost certainly between the filters and the flatteners.

I would take that Astrodon article with a grain of salt. Sounds to me like somebody using techno talk to hide a weakness.

If you have ever seen an Astrodon filter there would be no question where the reflections come from. They are like mirrors, like Ha filters. I have seen some horrendous reflections far far worse than anything in either of our images from Astrodon Gen 1 and APOs.

Reflections from the cover slip give tiny little reflections hardly worth bothering with but a small gain regardless. After all the slip is only a few mm from the chip. It couldn't physically give a largish reflection. There are posted examples on the net just not sure where now. Perhaps the Apogee site.

As you must use a flattener with these large chipped cameras reflections become a real point to check out.

Gen 11 Astrodons may well be different although I had someone send me an image with them that showed really bad reflections. I forget what APO it was -perhaps an FSQ106ED.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-02-2009, 12:56 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Here you go Mike:

1. Apogee cameras do not have cover slips:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/apogee/message/502

2. Here is a sample mask one guy made (U16M camera comes standard with a professional aluminium black mask and they supplied one free after the sale to me)

http://astro.ihermans.com/test/reflections/mask.html

3. Tests showing the results of with and without a mask on reflections:

http://astro.ihermans.com/test/refle...omparison.html

4. Comparison of reflections between Astrodon Gen 1 and Gen 11 filters on a Tak TOA 130 with field flattener:

http://astro.ihermans.com/test/refle...omparison.html

There is also a post somewhere with a TEC180 and Astrodon Gen 11 reflections. I'll have to find that myself before I get some.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-02-2009, 06:27 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,406
Wow
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-02-2009, 06:50 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Here you go Mike:

1. Apogee cameras do not have cover slips:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/apogee/message/502

2. Here is a sample mask one guy made (U16M camera comes standard with a professional aluminium black mask and they supplied one free after the sale to me)

http://astro.ihermans.com/test/reflections/mask.html

3. Tests showing the results of with and without a mask on reflections:

http://astro.ihermans.com/test/refle...omparison.html

4. Comparison of reflections between Astrodon Gen 1 and Gen 11 filters on a Tak TOA 130 with field flattener:

http://astro.ihermans.com/test/refle...omparison.html

There is also a post somewhere with a TEC180 and Astrodon Gen 11 reflections. I'll have to find that myself before I get some.

Greg.
Hmm? quite compelling..? I may have to send my ProLine back for the FLI aperture mask to be installed - FLI cameras come standard with an aperture mask now but unlike Apogee, FLI cams are hermetically sealed units and filled with Argon gas so must go back to be opened up and backfilled after the install. The new Astronomiks on their way seem like they will be very welcomed though so that's good.

Cheers for that mate!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-02-2009, 07:45 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Hmm? quite compelling..? I may have to send my ProLine back for the FLI aperture mask to be installed - FLI cameras come standard with an aperture mask now but unlike Apogee, FLI cams are hermetically sealed units and filled with Argon gas so must go back to be opened up and backfilled after the install. The new Astronomiks on their way seem like they will be very welcomed though so that's good.

Cheers for that mate!

Mike

Hi Mike,

The Apogee CCD chamber is sealed and filled with gas - not sure if argon or something else. The mask went on the outside of the CCD chamber and behind the shutter and you could do it yourself. Perhaps they have a different type of mask. Does it go inside the CCD chamber? Or is the whole body of the camera sealed?

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement