Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science

Poll: Has Your Opinion Changed Since the IAU's decided to 'demote' Pluto in 2006?
Poll Options
Has Your Opinion Changed Since the IAU's decided to 'demote' Pluto in 2006?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-02-2008, 11:48 AM
AJames
Southern Amateur

AJames is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Exclamation Since the IAU's decision to 'demote' Pluto, have you changing your opinions?

On 15th April 2007, Chissyo posted a thread on "Pluto and the IAU - What do you think?"
(See http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=19273 )

At the time, people were very passionate on the decision, whose effect was to completely polarise opinion either for or against. Many displayed either tears or cheers!
As sometime has past since then, and things have simmered down, has your opinion changed of this "Pluto Demotion" controversy?
Did it change your world-view or was it merely another "proverbial drop in the ocean"?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2008, 03:03 PM
The FishMan
The Prince of Darkness

The FishMan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9
Why demote it? I can't understand why? Is this a 'Nanny state' decision. Was it politically-correct to remove Pluto.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2008, 09:38 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
I didn't see any point in it then to demote Pluto and I still can't see any point in it now.

I often wonder why Mercury wasn't demoted as well, there is approx 1200km diference in their equatorial radius.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2008, 10:56 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
I haven't changed my mind.

As a scientific decision it made sense to derive a firm definition of a planet - which is what they did. If science was not willing to change to adapt and grow we would never get anywhere

Ric - Mercury is still a planet, and pluto isn't, because the 3rd requirement of the definition is only met by one of these two bodies

is in orbit around the Sun,
has sufficient mass so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and
has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2008, 11:07 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Thanks for the links Andrew, that clears up my questions about Mercury.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2008, 11:44 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,836
I don't think it's fair, has anyone ever actually asked the Plutonians what they think

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-02-2008, 09:47 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuts View Post
I don't think it's fair, has anyone ever actually asked the Plutonians what they think

Paul
Sorry I forgot, the I.A.U are just a bunch of Plutocrats

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-02-2008, 04:30 PM
Craig.a.c (Craig)
Registered User

Craig.a.c is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wagga NSW.
Posts: 381
I grew up with our solar system having 9 planets, and I will always class pluto as a planet. Poor little fella.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-02-2008, 10:14 PM
higginsdj's Avatar
higginsdj
A Lazy Astronomer

higginsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
It never ceases to amaze me how people still believe it was a 'demotion' and they still think it has to do with size. Even Tombaugh thought soon after his discovery that Pluto was not a planet.

People, get over it, it is a scientific classification - Pluto itself has not changed.

Stand by for what New Horizon may bring and a possible reclassification into something else - thats the nature of science. As we learn more about something we more accurately classify it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26-02-2008, 10:26 PM
mark3d
Registered User

mark3d is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 268
as soon as i saw that all the planets orbit the sun in a disc except pluto which is at like 45 degrees i was happy to consider it a stray that got caught in the suns gravity during its travels - not a planet that coalesced from gas and stuff along with ours 4.5 billion years ago so big asteroid is my opion (although what if it formed elsewhere as a legit planet but ended up here hehe who knows)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-02-2008, 09:20 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJames View Post
On 15th April 2007, Chissyo posted a thread on "Pluto and the IAU - What do you think?"
(See http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=19273 )

At the time, people were very passionate on the decision, whose effect was to completely polarise opinion either for or against. Many displayed either tears or cheers!
As sometime has past since then, and things have simmered down, has your opinion changed of this "Pluto Demotion" controversy?
Did it change your world-view or was it merely another "proverbial drop in the ocean"?
Oh yes - completely changed my world view: I now find I'm sleeping less, have become totally disenchanted with all those values I once held in high esteem and, quite frankly, becoming rather depressed and cynical to the point where I am thinking of burning my "Big Golden Book of Astronomy" - one of my AA heirlooms from 50 odd years ago. Please, is there anything I can do to pull myself out of this spiralling depression?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-03-2008, 10:49 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
The large asteroids---Ceres, Vesta, Juno, Pallas--were once considered planets, but were later "demoted" to minor planets or asteroids as more were discovered. Nobody sheds a tear for them any more and in 50 years time nobody will think twice about Pluto's status. Time heals all.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:34 AM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
cathartic.....

Thanks for that Geoff: does that mean I can get on with/get a life now?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:19 PM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
I think they are worried the the oort cloud might have 100,000+ Pluto sized objects and no one will be able to name them all. Anyway when I hear the world Pluto I think of Disney...

Gazz
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:30 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by cahullian View Post
Anyway when I hear the world Pluto I think of Disney...

Gazz
What about Uranus?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:32 PM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
Lol don't get me started on that one...

Gazz
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement