#1  
Old 20-02-2008, 04:13 PM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,403
Milky Way bigger than we thought

The Milky Way - our home galaxy - is twice as thick as we thought it was, Australian astrophysicists say.
Professor Bryan Gaensler from the University of Sydney and his team have found that the enormous spiral-shaped collection of gas and stars is 12,000 light years thick when seen edge-on, not 6,000 as scientists previously thought...
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...20/2167853.htm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-02-2008, 06:08 PM
DARKMATTER's Avatar
DARKMATTER
New Guy..

DARKMATTER is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 27
interesting, Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-02-2008, 11:27 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Glen can we look at them the next time out? Great link
alex
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-02-2008, 02:14 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,403
Do you mean the Milky Way or the pulsars?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-02-2008, 08:24 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
any pulsar region would be good ...only ever seen crab neb prob others but not aware...
alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-02-2008, 08:58 AM
CoombellKid
Registered User

CoombellKid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,590
Interesting article Glen, I wonder if this will mean they might also revaluate
the width of the Milky Way or any other galaxy. I've always thought there
is probably a lot of hidden stuff extending out from a galaxies disc which
we cant see or pick up visually or photograpically.

regards,CS
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-02-2008, 12:54 PM
Outbackmanyep's Avatar
Outbackmanyep
Registered User

Outbackmanyep is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Walcha , NSW
Posts: 1,652
Hmmmm, interesting! I wonder if people are willing to accept if it true, there were lots of skeptics when Pluto got demoted, now the milky way is twice as thick!?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-02-2008, 06:48 PM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,403
Rob do you know of any pulsars that we could see?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-02-2008, 08:14 PM
CoombellKid
Registered User

CoombellKid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenc View Post
Rob do you know of any pulsars that we could see?
Off the top of my head, I'm pretty sure the central star in the Helix is a
pulsar and easily observable. Another in the Crab Neb which I have never
seen, Alex have you actually eyeballed it?

Apart from that I'm not sure. I think most observations done on pulsars is
with a radio telescope.

regards,CS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-02-2008, 03:24 PM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,403
Milky Way fatter than first thought

Here is the smh version of the story.
http://news.smh.com.au/milky-way-fat...0220-1tbv.html
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-02-2008, 06:12 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoombellKid View Post
Off the top of my head, I'm pretty sure the central star in the Helix is a
pulsar and easily observable. Another in the Crab Neb which I have never
seen, Alex have you actually eyeballed it?

Apart from that I'm not sure. I think most observations done on pulsars is
with a radio telescope.

regards,CS
I could say yes up home you can see that sort of theing....er but no...but I did not think it was posible so I would not have tried.. mmm
alex
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-02-2008, 11:11 PM
GrahamL's Avatar
GrahamL
pro lumen

GrahamL is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ballina
Posts: 3,265
Can any of the closer dwarf galaxys now be back in the fold so to speak because of this glen?.. To double the size of one width of the tape sure is a big change ..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-02-2008, 01:24 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,403
I suspect we still have the same number of dwarf companions, but some will be closer.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-02-2008, 01:45 AM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
does that make our Galaxy the biggest in the local group now??

Gazz
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement