Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-02-2008, 12:54 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
How good is a Losmandy?

Here is a good quote to stir the pot a little:

The Losmandy G-11 has been the entry level mount of choice for imagers on a budget for a number of years. The GM-8 is not stiff enough to be a good imaging mount.
Ron Wodaski: The New CCD Astronomy, p133.

He goes on to say that unguided exposures with the G-11 are often problematic due to tracking errors, and recommends using an autoguider.

Another quote:
The G-11 is a good choice if you are on a tight budget, but expect to put in some time tuning the mount and learning about its behaviour under load.

Personally, I have taken many images with my GM-8, often in quite windy conditions, and whatever faults these images may have, tracking has never been a problem, both with manual guiding and autoguiding, although I have never tried unguided track and stack.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-02-2008, 12:59 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
In general, I'm a bit disappointed with my Losmandy GM-8. Backlash I simply can't get rid of, needing to tweak gears, that kind of thing really disappoints and annoys me. But I still manage to get photo's using with little problem/work-around.

The comment "is not stiff enough" is really odd, I'd say the thing is rock solid for it's weight capacity. Doesn't budget in a strong wind. Wouldn't know if there's flexure issues, but I haven't noticed problems caused by flexure.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-02-2008, 01:22 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghsmith45 View Post
Another quote:
The G-11 is a good choice if you are on a tight budget, but expect to put in some time tuning the mount and learning about its behaviour under load.
I have to say that my 'budget' is a wee bit tighter than that
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-02-2008, 01:23 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
I think the real question is, how bad is a Losmandy (or any mount for that matter) and what can be done to fix it up to give good photo's.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-02-2008, 02:06 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,473
The G-11 has undergone many evolutionary changes, which are not externally obvious to the end user, and have been made since Mr Wodaski wrote his comments some years ago.

Current series mounts have bronze worms, thicker gears, better bearings and
there is a double worm bearing assembly in beta testing now.

In short, they are more rigid and track better now than ever before. Many users are reporting +/- 4 arc sec raw PE with a very smooth transition over the 4 minute period.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-02-2008, 02:11 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
It's been said before that a G-11 is either an entry level mount for a serious astonomer, or a high end mount for the average amateur. Since I don't see myself splashing out 8 or 9 grand for an AP Mach1GTO, I'd class myself as the latter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement