Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-10-2007, 11:53 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
M42 from Glebe

Hi All,

M42 from Glebe

Meade ED80, EQ6, Astronomic UHC filter, EOS400D
No guiding

9 images 30 sec to 3 minutes

Converted to TIF in canon photo professional
Stacked in DSS, RGB set to square root, luminance set to zero
Levels in CS2
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (m42squareroot.jpg)
181.6 KB76 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-10-2007, 06:12 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Nice work again, lovely reds. Not sure if you clipped the histogram too much though? For 3 minute exposures, the running man should show up a bit more? Although being from light-polluted glebe could've had more to do with that
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-10-2007, 09:43 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Paul, looking at the histogram it would appear the data could be stretch a little more. However, this will bring out more noise in the process. You'll need more data to circumvent this or investigate noise reduction techniques. The quality is improving from your previous posts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-10-2007, 08:42 AM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Paul, looking at the histogram it would appear the data could be stretch a little more. However, this will bring out more noise in the process. You'll need more data to circumvent this or investigate noise reduction techniques. The quality is improving from your previous posts.
Hi Jase,

Thanks, i am slowly learning but its a long slow process. Glebe has horrible light pollution and i am trying various filters so far

Astronomic UHC, darkens the background nicely but lets in less light so have to image longer.

Orion Skyglow, more light but the sky has a torquoise tinge and reflections around stars.

BAADER Skyglow, very dissapointing for imaging. I just got it and sky goes lime green and still lots of light pollution.

The best so far seems to be the astronomic. Any other suggestions?

Thanks Paul
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-10-2007, 10:48 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Hi Paul, I think you have done well with M42. I used to live in Waverley out in the eastern suburbs in the early 80's and I thought it was bad then. I hate to think of what it's like now.

Have you thought of narrowband imaging in Ha, OIII etc.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-10-2007, 11:02 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,805
Good job Paul, yep, it sure takes a while to get it right, but we all get there eventually, a big learning curve, I know, I'm in the middle of it, well done by the way.

leon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement