Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-01-2007, 12:29 PM
brett
Registered User

brett is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Macleod, VIC
Posts: 16
in a pickle.... pentax xf vs baader hyperion?

hi guys

i have an etx125 and a small assortment of EPs at present. i just got a pentax xf 8.5mm 60o-fov and a baader 17mm 68o-fov.

since i am new to scopes i'm not sure how much magnification will affect light etc...

when using the 17mm on a terrestrial object the light is somewhere between 250-300% brighter than using the 8.5mm. i have not had a chance to get the two EPs out in the dark to compare at this stage as the weather is bad.

what are you thoughts on a mid-range EP for the ETX. am i best to stick with a 12mm xf or a 13mm baader? or both!?

hope that all makes sense

brett
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-01-2007, 12:54 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Hi Brett.

The 8.5mm XF is probably as high as you would want to go in power with the ETX 125. You are right, magnification will affect brightness. And you are not that far off in your assessment of the difference between the 17 and 8.5mm. Based on magnification alone the 17mm should be 4 times, ie 400%, brighter than the 8.5mm. ((17/8.5) squared = 4)

Re 12mm XF vs 13mm Hyperion. IMO the XFs are some of the finest EPs available. I do own a 13mm Stratus which is very similar to the Hyperion, and it is a great EP for the money. (Also own 8.5mm XF and used to own 8mm Stratus. Never tried 12mm XF.) IMO, the Stratus is not in the same league as the XF. I'd trade my 13mm Stratus for a 12mm XF in a heartbeat (which btw is similarly priced amazingly).

I'd expect the XF in your scope will be practically edge-to-edge perfection. (the only complaint I've read about the 12mm XF is mild field curvature in fast Newts - unlikely to apply in a slow Mak.) The Hyperion will have more field, but also barrel distortion which gives a "ring of fire" effect (brighter near the edge than in centre) and chromatic aberration outside the central 45-55 degrees. Contrast and transmission is better with the XF. Hyperion wins on comfort because of the rubber eyeguard. But the XF with its adjustable eyeguard is quite comfy also and the light weight of the XF is great too. but as you own both types of EPs you can judge ergonomics issues for yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-01-2007, 01:00 PM
brett
Registered User

brett is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Macleod, VIC
Posts: 16
wow. thanks. you have answered basically all of my questions i suppose the baader wasn't a bad idea for the 17mm as it'll be a bit further out but the 12mm XF sounds the way to go for sure i wanted more fov but if the quality is going to reduce outside of 55o then it's reasonbly pointless for a high mag EP.

thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement