ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 7%
|
|

02-11-2015, 07:52 PM
|
 |
Senior Citizen
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
|
|
Yah gotta read this ..... and get a laugh
|

02-11-2015, 07:59 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,630
|
|
Quote:
If this eyepiece in anyway fails to disappoint, just return it and I will refund your money!
|
|

02-11-2015, 08:10 PM
|
 |
Deprived of starlight
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,912
|
|
Must resist temptation to bid...
|

02-11-2015, 08:16 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
|
|
 Oh my ,,, had one of these once ,,
,,,, don't any more .  .
But trufully they ain't to bad , just time has caught up  . Erfle ? design I think .
This is why I now have my full set of TV Radians , the 14mm is a champ .
Brian.
|

02-11-2015, 08:21 PM
|
 |
Novichok test rabbit
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian nordstrom
. Erfle ? design I think .
Brian.
|
Awful ? design I think
|

02-11-2015, 08:40 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
|
|
 T'was always said .
We are so spoilt today ...
Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM
Awful ? design I think
|
|

02-11-2015, 10:28 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cecil Plains QLD
Posts: 1,228
|
|
Gee that is so good! haha
|

02-11-2015, 11:30 PM
|
 |
Aidan
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,669
|
|
this deserves a slow clap, we need an emoticon for that
|

08-11-2015, 04:33 PM
|
Politically incorrect.
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
|
|
Hmmm.... Not so good for business. Wonder if he asked Andrews to refund before unloading on the business. May have been a dud that got through Q.C.??
|

21-11-2015, 08:27 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5
|
|
|

22-11-2015, 05:13 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wonthaggi Vic
Posts: 625
|
|
Well I'm the one who bought it. I had to, to see how bad it was. I'll up date you to its faults when I get the chance to try it out.
|

22-11-2015, 06:59 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne Victoria
Posts: 103
|
|
Re eye piece
LOL... Just another fast buck type operation, like all the others!!
|

23-11-2015, 12:28 AM
|
 |
Searching for Travolta...
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
|
|
Quote:
Ok, so why on Earth would anyone want to buy this eyepiece??.........
8) You're a wierdo with a fetish for bad eyepieces
11) You are one of those people that just place bids on anything.
|
   I laughed so hard my face hurts.
From what I could see there were 5 bids on it  .
Look forward to your report Simon  , if you don't like it at least you can use it as a door stopper as suggested  .
Or as also suggested.... pack it with explosives and blow it up
|

23-11-2015, 09:43 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
|
|
This is very funny,still laughing, love the list of reasons to bis on it #10 and #14 are a real chuckle!
|

23-11-2015, 09:59 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wonthaggi Vic
Posts: 625
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzy
   I laughed so hard my face hurts.
From what I could see there were 5 bids on it  .
Look forward to your report Simon  , if you don't like it at least you can use it as a door stopper as suggested  .
Or as also suggested.... pack it with explosives and blow it up 
|
or resell it
|

23-11-2015, 10:10 AM
|
 |
Nerd from Outer Space
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzy
   I laughed so hard my face hurts.
From what I could see there were 5 bids on it  .
|
5 bidders and 16 bids. The 5 bidders have been fighting for it...
|

23-11-2015, 11:51 AM
|
 |
Searching for Travolta...
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzStarGazer
5 bidders and 16 bids. The 5 bidders have been fighting for it... 
|
I noticed  .
Simon, I can't wait to hear your thoughts. It may even be okay-ish enough to use if you have kids looking through the scope (I have a simple set for that reason).
But I'm doubtful you'll get much more than what you paid for it  .
I had a 2 inch 30mm 80deg ep (I think it was an old Bintel one ?) that I sold on here for only $30, and the price seemed fair at the time.
But, I don't think that e-bay seller was kidding, going by this review on the Cloudy Nights forum  .
He seems to be an extremely honest ebay seller- what else does he sell? 
I have the Andrews 30mm 80deg 2" UWA mentioned here and it's okay, preferring to keep it and sell the other.
http://www.cloudynights.com/topic/91...used-or-owned/
Quote:
[Apart from those super dodgy "eyepieces" that come with department store telescopes, what is the worst eyepiece that you have ever used or owned?
I had a search of this forum and found that this topic was discussed about 10 months ago, however most of the responses back then were in relation to department store telescope eyepieces. What I'm really interested in is eyepieces that you specifically went out to buy (or use) thinking they will provide some decent performance but ended up being complete duds.
For me the worst eyepiece I have ever owned is the BW-Optik 15mm, advertised under the "Andrews" brand in Australia. It is a 2 inch eyepiece with an 80 degree FOV. I bought it after the much praised 30mm version of this eyepieces that came free with my telescope. Having used both eyepieces, I can say that the 30m BW-Optik is a fair eyepiece for the price and is probably an excellent choice for those with longer focal length telescopes. The 15mm version however, is in my opinion complete optical trash! There are numerous things wrong with this eyepieces, from the top of my head they include:
- Poor build quality. It has a cheap look and feel.
- The outer 50% of the FOV is very poorly corrected and almost totally unusable in a fast telescope.
- The central 50% of the FOV is fair but nothing great, and certainly does not compensate for its terrible outer 50%.
- No defined field stop.
- A very large and fuzzy reflection is brightly visible circling the edge of the FOV. I think it is the reflection of the silver retaining ring.
- Very fuzzy edge.
- Poor eye relief for a 15 mm eyepiece. My eye almost has to touch the lens to see the entire field of view.
- Many Large black particles were found on the outside of the bottom lens which had to be cleaned off.
|
|

23-11-2015, 12:24 PM
|
 |
Nerd from Outer Space
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
|
|
So it is really rubbish? LOL
But it's almost Christmas and maybe Simon can quickly get rid of it if he doesn't like it and at the same time have a Christmas present less on his list.
Simon, maybe you can open a PayPal dispute for "item not as described" if you like it and get your money back...
|

30-11-2015, 07:54 PM
|
 |
Senior Citizen
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzStarGazer
Simon, maybe you can open a PayPal dispute for "item not as described" if you like it and get your money back... 
|
Now there's a thought Simon....
Col...
|
Thread Tools |
|
Rate This Thread |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:31 PM.
|
|