Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-02-2013, 04:04 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,476
Autoguider - Colour or Mono

When it comes to CCD Cameras used for autoguiding application does it really matter if the sensor is mono or a colour
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2013, 04:58 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Mono sensors are more sensitive than colour sensors
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2013, 05:00 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
You'll get more "bang per buck" - fainter guide stars, with a mono.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2013, 05:31 PM
pluto's Avatar
pluto (Hugh)
Astro Noob

pluto is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
I'm really interested in this as I'm in need of a guide camera but would love it to double as a planetary cam. The specific camera I'm looking at is the QHY5L-II which in mono I'm sure would make a good entry-level guide cam and in colour would make an great planetary cam.
Does anyone have any real-world experience testing a mono and a colour version of the "same" camera? perhaps a QHY5 mono and colour?
I'm just trying to gauge how different the sensitivity is in actual use as a guide cam. eg is mono 200% more sensitive for guiding? or can a mono cam see stars 2-3-4-? magnitude fainter than colour?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2013, 05:56 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by pluto View Post
I'm really interested in this as I'm in need of a guide camera but would love it to double as a planetary cam. The specific camera I'm looking at is the QHY5L-II which in mono I'm sure would make a good entry-level guide cam and in colour would make an great planetary cam.
Does anyone have any real-world experience testing a mono and a colour version of the "same" camera? perhaps a QHY5 mono and colour?
I'm just trying to gauge how different the sensitivity is in actual use as a guide cam. eg is mono 200% more sensitive for guiding? or can a mono cam see stars 2-3-4-? magnitude fainter than colour?
Maybe you should talk to Theo at Gama-Electronics. He is the Aust. dealer for QHY. I got my QHY5 mono guider and QHY IMG132E lunar/planetary camera from him, and he is full of good advice.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2013, 06:55 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
I don't have a "back to back" comparison with the same cameras -mono-OSC...
But I do know the sensitivity of a OSC due to the Bayer matrix, compared with a mono is around 70% (at best)
We're not comparing resolution...but general QE....binning is also an issue when it comes to guiding...not all (any???) OSC cameras can give say 2 x 2 binning....
I used the original QHY5 for a while, but ended up going to the Lodestar for guiding on fainter stars for spectroscopy.
Hope this helps...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement