Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid
Pete did you do that SAO course as a stand-alone module or as part of their Masters programme?
I would be very interested in going down that path if it's open.
Peter
|
Peter
I started doing the SAO course to see how I'd go. I have an Arts/Law background and haven't looked seriously at physics/maths since high school in 1982. So I started with the Graduate Certificate program ie 4 subjects out of 16 available. When I managed to get through those ok I decided to keep going. 8 subjects gets you a Graduate Diploma - which I completed last semester. So with only 4 subjects to go for a Masters, I'm set on finishing it all now.
My first semester was tough - I took 2 units concurrently while working full time. Luckily it coincided with the GFC and I had a pretty light load that year - I'd not attempt 2 subjects again.
I'd encourage you to try it - its demanding but very rewarding. What I love about the course is that each subject requires you to take a project worth 30% of your assessment (though I believe that this is changing for some of the introductory subjects). You can do this by internet research but my preference is for the practical tasks. Its been great to learn how to use my gear to do real science. I've observed double stars and asteroids, calculated the rotation period of 2 asteroids and the period of a RR Lyrae and a Cepheid variable and refined my astrophotography skills doing a deep image of a galaxy cluster. The highlight was last year when I took a spectrum of 3C 273, a bright quasar, and then derived its redshift from the change in the emission lines from what I'd expect for a nearby object.
Let me know if you'd like to know anything more.
Pete