Maybe I should have put up a jpg that falls apart at close inspection where all the stars are just jagged bits of junk.
Then without further thinking we can all say "nice".
I honestly do not care and the comments are taken on board but this is the best I could do with the available data.
When amateurs rubbish an FSQ 106 as far as resolution is concerned I am sincerely doubting their sanity. The fact that this image has more depth than anything put up so far could be the problem.
I will leave you all to ponder my shortcomings.
Bert
Last edited by avandonk; 29-05-2010 at 06:35 PM.
|