Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
That's not the proposition that 100 French Doctors put their names too, when saying that e-cigarettes shouldn't be regulated. They plainly wouldn't have done so if the health effects had been as bad as you suggest.
Certainly though, one should Google the subject and see what comes up.
Regards,
Renato
|
I don't know about these 100 French Doctors, but here is what the Cleveland Clinic says:
http://health.clevelandclinic.org/20...ll-be-at-risk/
And another medical paper:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/...arettes-emerge
All I'm saying is that there is emerging evidence that e-cigarettes are not safe. Its early days - it took decades before the evidence for tobacco harm emerged, and it would be either naive or foolish to dismiss the evidence so far.
As for e-cigarettes without nicotine, read the second paper which discusses the problems with inhaling a heated vapour. Lungs do not like having small organic molecules inhaled into them.
It took me 3 attempts to give up smoking. Its a wickedly difficult habit to break, and I know that one of the rationalisations used is to tell yourself what your doing is not likely to cause you a problem. But in the end, why risk your health and life for the chance to inhale small organic molecules that damage every organ in your body? That the question I kept asking myself to motivate me to quit.