Mars Mewlon 180 vs C9.25

[Robert_T]

Hi all, here's an image of mars taken through the Mewlon 180 a few minutes after that one posted yesterday with the C9.25 (shown again below at right). Overprocessed a bit. Not really a fair comparison as I was using electronic focus on the 9.25 and haven't collimated the Mewlon yet. Visually I didn't think there was much in it. Anyway here it is FWIW.

cheers,

[iceman]

hmm that doesn't look quite right..

The mewlon version looks waay too smooth, like too many frames stacked, bad seeing, and/or bad focus and/or bad collimation.

Look forward to some more comparisons in future.. i think it's great to see comparison images side by side with different scopes, cameras etc, but it's very hard doing in exactly the same conditions for a fair test.

The shot on the right still looks good :)

[bird]

I'd guess that the mewlon version has had a bit too much ME deconvolution - that can cause the smooth disk, sharp edge effect.

regards, Bird

[asimov]

Youv'e got the details there, just needs something to bring them out a bit better, Still nice shots Rob!!