leon
25-05-2009, 03:34 PM
Hi Guys, this may sound a bit off, and probably some may think I'm a bit loopy as well, but the fact is, this is spot on, and works perfectly.
Did you know, when using a Tak FSQ-106, and I presume this will work with any fine instrument, that one can make the pattern of the now Bahtinov Mask appear very clear, and defined in the view finder of a Canon Angle Finder attached to that perticular scope.
I actually had a Mask made for the Tak, but sold it two days later because it was quite usless to my needs.
What I do when focusing the Tak through the 5D and angle finder is this.
I focus the scope, always be eye only, I don't use any sofware at all, then I turn the focus ring on the angle finer so it is just a wisker out of focus, then adjust the main scope untill the Bahtinov Masks lines snaps into place, and are clearly visible.
It works 99% of all imaging runs.
Has anyone else experienced this.
Leon :thumbsup:
Did you know, when using a Tak FSQ-106, and I presume this will work with any fine instrument, that one can make the pattern of the now Bahtinov Mask appear very clear, and defined in the view finder of a Canon Angle Finder attached to that perticular scope.
I actually had a Mask made for the Tak, but sold it two days later because it was quite usless to my needs.
What I do when focusing the Tak through the 5D and angle finder is this.
I focus the scope, always be eye only, I don't use any sofware at all, then I turn the focus ring on the angle finer so it is just a wisker out of focus, then adjust the main scope untill the Bahtinov Masks lines snaps into place, and are clearly visible.
It works 99% of all imaging runs.
Has anyone else experienced this.
Leon :thumbsup: