sculptor
20-05-2007, 09:13 AM
Help requested. Over a two hour period, autoguider crosshairs stayed within a few arc sec of guide star, but main camera image drifted by 3' arc and rotated by about 18' arc. Causes?
Flimsiness? I've made a rather elaborate and possibly too flimsy bracket that permits two-knob adjustment of autoguider relative to main scope, which also allows for off-axis guiding. It is possible that as whole scope rotates by 30 deg over 2 hrs, differential strains have caused the autoguider to flop about by 3' arc relative to the main scope.
Mirror flop? Celestron 11" SCT with no mirror lock.
Polar axis alignment? My (self-written) alignment software (15 star alignment) thinks polar axis is off about 0.5 deg, with about 0.25 deg of cone. My maths has temporarily evaporated due to being up all night, but it seems about the right order of magnitude to account for 18' arc field rotation. Any experts? Is there a second-order effect that could cause the 3' arc differential beween main scope and autoguider?
Off-axis guiding? On this occasion, the guider was pretty close to on-axis from the night before, but I'd not specifically set it up on-axis. Can off-axis guiding produce this sort of effect.
Luckily, I was stacking 5 min exposures, so each exposure moves only 15 sec arc, and the stars look perfectly round.
Expert advice most welcome.
Flimsiness? I've made a rather elaborate and possibly too flimsy bracket that permits two-knob adjustment of autoguider relative to main scope, which also allows for off-axis guiding. It is possible that as whole scope rotates by 30 deg over 2 hrs, differential strains have caused the autoguider to flop about by 3' arc relative to the main scope.
Mirror flop? Celestron 11" SCT with no mirror lock.
Polar axis alignment? My (self-written) alignment software (15 star alignment) thinks polar axis is off about 0.5 deg, with about 0.25 deg of cone. My maths has temporarily evaporated due to being up all night, but it seems about the right order of magnitude to account for 18' arc field rotation. Any experts? Is there a second-order effect that could cause the 3' arc differential beween main scope and autoguider?
Off-axis guiding? On this occasion, the guider was pretty close to on-axis from the night before, but I'd not specifically set it up on-axis. Can off-axis guiding produce this sort of effect.
Luckily, I was stacking 5 min exposures, so each exposure moves only 15 sec arc, and the stars look perfectly round.
Expert advice most welcome.