John K
18-03-2007, 04:14 PM
With Jupiter imaging back into the swing of things, one of the things I have noticed is that my avi's have been a lot longer than expected in actual time to record.
This means that a 130 second AVI is in fact taking 2min 10 seconds, a 150 second AVI takes 2 min 30 seconds and a 165 second AVI takes 2 min 45 seconds. This is at 10 fps. With Jupiter spinning so fast the recommendation is in fact to limit imaging to 2 mins.
Is the fact that I am recording at the full Y2KH?? (whatever it's called) compression causing this? Also, in Registax, I find that I get limited to 1650 or thereabouts in these high res frames even after AVI Raw ras done it's RGB thing.
Thoughts appreciated.
p.s. hate to admit it but I still use AMCAP to capture all my AVI's, seems to work better on my Laptop that K3CCD tools for some reason in terms of the live stream I get when focusing/capturing whereas K3CCD tools gives a very fragmented streaming live view.
This means that a 130 second AVI is in fact taking 2min 10 seconds, a 150 second AVI takes 2 min 30 seconds and a 165 second AVI takes 2 min 45 seconds. This is at 10 fps. With Jupiter spinning so fast the recommendation is in fact to limit imaging to 2 mins.
Is the fact that I am recording at the full Y2KH?? (whatever it's called) compression causing this? Also, in Registax, I find that I get limited to 1650 or thereabouts in these high res frames even after AVI Raw ras done it's RGB thing.
Thoughts appreciated.
p.s. hate to admit it but I still use AMCAP to capture all my AVI's, seems to work better on my Laptop that K3CCD tools for some reason in terms of the live stream I get when focusing/capturing whereas K3CCD tools gives a very fragmented streaming live view.