View Full Version here: : IC2944 narrowband
rmuhlack
07-05-2016, 04:54 PM
My attempt at IC2944 - the Running Chicken Nebula.
Capture details:
SII: 27 x 600s
Ha: 24 x 600s
OIII: 25 x 600s
Vixen VC200L @ f6.4, NEQ6 mount, SBIG ST10XE @ -15C
Ha as Lum, SHO as RGB. Processed in Pixinsight, with the aid of Rick's Color Mask script.
I haven't had much experience with narrowband, so comments/feedback appreciated. :thumbsup:
Hi res: http://www.astrobin.com/full/247574/B/
Stevec35
07-05-2016, 05:05 PM
Not bad Richard but it would be even better with more data. I would also tone down the magenta a bit.
Cheers
Steve
RickS
07-05-2016, 05:19 PM
It's not what I'd do colourwise, Richard, but I really like it!
Paul Haese
07-05-2016, 05:21 PM
Good detail Richard, the palette is a fair representation of the distribution of gases in the field but I prefer the more red/brown tones myself. With narrow band though it really is what you like and how you want to represent the gas distribution. I like the composition. Overall this is an very good image from an imager (to use your words) without "much experience in narrow band". Certainly better than some of my first attempts.
Atmos
07-05-2016, 06:08 PM
I really like the colours! I think it would make a spectacular starless version as it would look like a pastel painting or something :)
Killing off some of that magenta would be good (I still really struggle with that) and the first words that may come out of Strongmans mouth may be "Worms" ;)
I do really like it though, a bit more data will make it easier to do noise control.
rmuhlack
07-05-2016, 07:32 PM
Perhaps a more aesthetically pleasing colour scheme for some rather than the more "scientific" version originally posted...
Hi-res http://www.astrobin.com/full/247574/C/
Placidus
07-05-2016, 09:05 PM
Hi, Richard,
Nice framing, and generally well done. In both versions you've pushed limited data to show very faint features.
The first version seemed to us to be very saturated, and, running my cursor over the image and looking at the numbers, too blue rather than too magenta.
The second version is much more what we'd expect and also prefer. Nice.
Looking forward to seeing further forays into narrowband.
Best,
M & T
rmuhlack
07-05-2016, 09:30 PM
thanks for the helpful and encouraging comments/feedback folks. much appreciated :cheers:
Shiraz
07-05-2016, 09:37 PM
The colour in second version seems more relaxing to look at. There is a bit of chroma noise that is really only visible at full res - maybe need a bit more data. The resolution is good and that could also possibly be improved further with more data. Overall, nice to look at.
Stevec35
09-05-2016, 09:31 AM
The latest version is a very considerable improvement in my opinion Richard
Cheers
Steve
rustigsmed
09-05-2016, 10:10 AM
nice going Richard especially considering you are using 10 minute subs. the S2 is really faint.
I don't mind a bit of magenta in the stars but the second is probably a bit nicer to my eye.
cheers
russ
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.