Log in

View Full Version here: : The Wolf Nebula


gregbradley
22-06-2014, 11:04 AM
I have imaged this one before after Paul Hease published his image of this a while ago.

I took 16 hours or data but only used about half of that the rest was rejected due to minor flaws.

I took a long time processing this one, several weeks. But I am happy with this final version that overcame a few aspects I was not happy with.

TEC180, MMOAG, STi guider, FLI Proline 16803 -35C, HaLRGB image taken from my dark site observatory. Good seeing.

http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/155890887/large regular size

http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/155890887/original large

Greg

multiweb
22-06-2014, 02:09 PM
Top shot. Love it!:thumbsup:

gregbradley
22-06-2014, 02:50 PM
Thanks Marc. I worked on this one a lot. It was a bit elusive for a while.

Greg.

RickS
22-06-2014, 03:37 PM
A very nice rendition, Greg!

LightningNZ
22-06-2014, 03:38 PM
Geez Greg, that's something special that is. House Stark would be proud! ;)
-Cam

batema
22-06-2014, 04:32 PM
Beautiful. I don't think I would know how to work on am image for several hours let alone weeks. I think I need to do some learning.

strongmanmike
22-06-2014, 06:23 PM
Yeah not bad, not bad at all...gives Marcus' version (the best I have seen of this object thus far) a real run for its money!... and he is going to win the DM's this year BTW ;)

Mike

gregbradley
22-06-2014, 09:22 PM
Thanks Rick. It took a while to tame the stars as they were a bit too dominating.



Thanks very much Cam. A lot of work went into it.



Its all good fun. Thanks Mark.



Cheers Mike. You got a hot tip. Are there odds running this year?

Greg.

marc4darkskies
23-06-2014, 01:05 PM
Good one Greg! I quite like the deep magenta you've got going on there. :thumbsup:



Stirrer!! :lol:

For the record, my version didn't get a guernsey from the Prof! :shrug:

Peter Ward
23-06-2014, 01:28 PM
I really like how you've managed to control the h-alpha blend.... no dark rings around the stars :thumbsup:

A great result !

strongmanmike
23-06-2014, 03:25 PM
Not all, just what I think, it's a beautiful image :)



Would have from me :thumbsup:...besides could still get a highly commended ;)

Oh and Greg, again, your Wolf is excellent!!

Mike

gregbradley
23-06-2014, 03:35 PM
Thanks Marc. Your rendition is quite spectacular.



Thanks very much Peter, I appreciate it.



Ta Mike. The main issue I had with this image was the stars were too dominant in the original versions. I had to tame them without damaging them. I tried the PI routine but it damaged the stars and the colours of the nebula. It probably needed more fiddling with the settings of the mask and the various steps. Photoshop with some masking and curves did it easily. I plan on mastering PI but I can see it could be a slow process.

Greg.

Phil Hart
25-06-2014, 01:10 PM
Very nice piece of work Greg. I don't see all the images here by any means but one of your most 'natural' and polished looking results that I've seen. The processing time has paid off. Something to be very happy with.

Phil

gregbradley
25-06-2014, 05:42 PM
Thanks Phil. That's anice compliment as I am striving to make my processing more natural. Its almost a contradiction "natural digital processing".

Greg.

atalas
25-06-2014, 06:23 PM
Terrific work Greg....really good contrast work too that's helped lift this shot.

gregbradley
25-06-2014, 06:58 PM
Cheers Louie.

Greg.

David Fitz-Henr
26-06-2014, 02:45 PM
That's really nice Greg, excellent image :thumbsup:

Octane
26-06-2014, 03:02 PM
Agreed, truly beautiful work.

H

gregbradley
26-06-2014, 05:13 PM
Thanks David.



Thanks Humi. I see you are getting ready to pump out some more excellent images.

Greg.

Octane
26-06-2014, 05:24 PM
Not anymore, I'm not. My STL-11000M sensor or glass chamber has cracked. I'm done for.

$3K repair bill (I've asked to send the camera to SBIG to make sure it's not the sensor, but, just the glass chamber).

I'm just not even thinking about it anymore. I paid $1K the other day for an FW8-STL and have paid PreciseParts for an adapter for the Extender-Q (like a Feldstein #6) which got sent to the wrong address (old address in PayPal) and was marked as a successful delivery as no signature was required (I'm chasing this up by writing a letter to the address and asking them to send the damn thing to me, as it's of no use to anyone).

Such a magnanimous waste of money. If it turns out to be more than the $200 repair of a cracked chamber, and I end up with an >$8K paperweight, I think I'll just sell everything and get out of the game.

H

gregbradley
26-06-2014, 05:42 PM
Ooh, sorry to hear about this. Hopefully its just a cracked CCD chamber glass.

Greg.

Octane
26-06-2014, 05:44 PM
Me, too.

I've just posted in the astroimaging equipment subforum.

H

hotspur
26-06-2014, 06:07 PM
This stunning,so beautiful,one of the most outstanding deep sky images seen on these pages,I hope you sent it to APOD.

gregbradley
26-06-2014, 06:26 PM
I hope it works out well for you.



Thanks very much Chris! Yes I have.

Greg.