Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-03-2006, 09:32 AM
stinky's Avatar
stinky
spamologist

stinky is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: directly above the centre of earth
Posts: 268
Zoom Eyepieces

Have noticed some less expensive zoom eyepieces being advertised - eg. SkyWatcher 7 - 21 mm.

Presently I have 2 eyepieces that came with my refractor - a 10 & 20. Went out and bought a 6mm Omni, but find I'm missing ut having to switch between the 10 and 20. Would a zoom lens deliver comparable performence to the same brand fixed eyepiece? Or are these low end - to be avoided?
Regards
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2006, 09:47 AM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinky
Would a zoom lens deliver comparable performence to the same brand fixed eyepiece? Or are these low end - to be avoided?
In general, no, and yes (in that order).

Zooms can be okay for terrestial use, but even then you need an expensive one (e.g. Zeiss, at +A$700). Just too many compromises are made in the design, so that for astronomical use the image is going to be very degraded. Also, in cheaper zooms, the AFOV is narrow to begin with and often shrinks even further as you zoom in.

The only advantage of a (good quality) zoom that I've heard of (like the TV 3-6mm model) is that it allows you to "dial in" the magnification to match the seeing when you're doing high powered lunar and planetary observing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-03-2006, 11:53 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
I agree, I try to avoid zoom anything in optics, although zoom camera lenses and variable power rifle scopes have come an enormous distance in the last 20 years.

A zoom eyepiece will never be as good as a high quality native eyepiece optically. Another issue with zoom eyepieces is that as the power is reduced so is the AFOV which is the opposite to what happens with fixed focal length eyepieces. Some high quality variable power eyepieces (Televue) have addressed the reducing AFOV issue in recent years but I seriously doubt that a budget variable will adress it.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-03-2006, 11:56 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
theres a really good write-up on zooms at cloudy nights you should read
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-03-2006, 12:03 PM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
I have a Seben 8-24mm zoom the optics aren't great, but you do get the wow factor when looking at star clusters. It looks like your flying through them. I find mine is also ok on the moon.

Gazz
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2006, 09:47 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
I have a Vixen 8-24 and Proxima 8-24 and I think the images are at least as good as generic plossls, though I haven't had the opportunity to use the zooms at high power or make critical comparisons to high quality eyepieces. I'll probably sell one of these eventually but I'll always have one zoom in the accessory box - they are just too easy to use.

-Tony
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement