Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-03-2006, 10:44 AM
TS
That's no moon...

TS is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Camden, NSW
Posts: 3
Eyepieces to start out with

G'Day good peoples,

My name is Rob, I'm a n00b to amateur astronomy I just purchased a LXD75 8" Schmidt-Newtonian from the great folks at Bintel. I'm looking for advice on what eyepieces and accessories i should purchase to start off with (as the only eyepiece I have is the 26mm Super Plossl I got with the scope).

I'm looking to start off by observing the planets and the moon.

Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2006, 10:49 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
they only gave you one EP? thats a bit lean isnt it!

you want to be looking a a range that will give you low power and high power and a little something in between.... whats the FL of you telescope?

also a barlow, red light and a sky map of some sort...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2006, 10:57 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
ok just looked it up.... its f/4.
*a 30mm for low power
*a 6 or 7mm for planets/highpower ( you could go lower but one has to take into acount eye relief). 7 mm gives you 114x magnification approx
*a 15 to 20mm for medium...

a barlow and a 7mm will give you 228x and you probably wont need to go higher
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2006, 11:01 AM
TS
That's no moon...

TS is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Camden, NSW
Posts: 3
sweet, thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2006, 11:20 AM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
Beware that if your scope is an F4, then it is probably intended as a rich field scope more than it is for hi magnification. Also, it probably has a relatively large secondary mirror, which might mean that you get some central shadowing when you use long focal length eyepieces on bright objects. Basically, I wouldn't advocate going much shorter than 10mm for your second EP.

Confused yet?

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2006, 06:26 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Welcome Rob! By all accounts that is a very nice scope you have there. How much money have you got to spend on eyepieces?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2006, 07:44 PM
TS
That's no moon...

TS is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Camden, NSW
Posts: 3
thanks Steve. I'm looking at spending around $300-400 on ep's to start off with. I'm gonna to go to the Bintel shop tomorrow arvo (along with the advice given ) and see what they suggest.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-03-2006, 07:57 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Then you're probably best off sticking with good plossls and/or orthos for such a fast scope. And get a good barlow to get high power. Bintel should know what works best with your scope.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:33 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
I would be looking for 5 element masayuma types such as the orion ultrascopics or celestron ultimas.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:47 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
FWIW. Seeing as you bought a Meade t'scope why not stick with Meade E/Pcs too? The Series 4000/5000 Super plossl's are very good, but may be a few $$ more. Just the facts m'am! L.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-03-2006, 10:31 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAJAH235
The Series 4000/5000 Super plossl's are very good, but may be a few $$ more. L.
Rajah,

There are several different versions of the Meade Series 4000 Super Plossls as you are probably aware. The early 5 element "Made in Japan" versions are excellent eyepieces. The later versions, made in China are very average indeed.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-03-2006, 10:39 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
Ta, John. Not seen too much feedback on the new S5000's yet. I have all 'Made in Japan', S4000's. Would have thought the later design/manufacture, would have been a little bit better. L.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-03-2006, 10:54 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
The S5000 14mm with 60 degree FOV is excellent in my f6, but I would not be so sure at f4.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-03-2006, 10:55 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAJAH235
Ta, John. Not seen too much feedback on the new S5000's yet.
I can tell you that the 14mm s5000 plossl gives bloated stars toward the edge at f5.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-03-2006, 02:10 AM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Slightly bloated stars near the edge do not bother me. It's the seagulls I loathe. f4 is going to be tough for any eyepiece. Maybe the Pentaxes would do allright, since they are actually designed for f3.something spotting scopes. (psst, can you keep a secret? I've just ordered a Pentax XF 8.5mm.)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-03-2006, 07:59 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Ummm when I say bloated stars, I mean not slightly like in a 14mm pentax xl, but considerably bloated, unacceptably so IMO.

I would definately not recommend the s5000 plossls for a fast scope although they performed great in Marks tak which is f8 I think ?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-03-2006, 09:17 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
How about the Stratus line? Wide field, good eye relief, OK at f/4, easy to resell if you don't like them, can get 2 inside the $400 budget.

-Tony
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-03-2006, 09:32 AM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
I don't think the Stratus/Hyperion will be too crash hot at f4. Still works okay at f5 but has noticeably more aberrations than at f6. Try before you buy for f4.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-03-2006, 09:45 AM
Vermin's Avatar
Vermin (Tom)
Cloud dodger

Vermin is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hobart
Posts: 584
I have a 20mm Televue Plossl for sale in the buy/sell/trade forum that would suit your scope. Not super wide field, but very sharp.
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ead.php?t=8171
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement