Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-03-2011, 06:52 PM
CarlJoseph (Carl)
Registered User

CarlJoseph is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dandenong Ranges
Posts: 265
My first few pics ...

A few of my first few shots. Certainly not wonderful but I'm pretty glad I managed to capture something. Haven't used any "darks" or anything like that. Keen for any feedback, advice, etc. on how I could improve.

All were taken with my Stellarvue 105 f/6.2 Triplet APO + Canon 450D.

Moon
15th March @ Home
8 x 1/25 second, ISO 400
Click image for larger version

Name:	moon - 20110314.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	121.7 KB
ID:	90850


Tarantula Nebula (NGC 2070)
5th March @ The Briars
2 x 5 seconds, 5 x 30 seconds, ISO 1600
Click image for larger version

Name:	2011_03_05 Tarantula - Final.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	200.4 KB
ID:	90849


Eta Carinae (NGC 3372)
5th March @ The Briars
9 x 30 seconds, ISO 1600
Click image for larger version

Name:	2011_03_05 Eta Carina - Final.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	214.4 KB
ID:	90848


Cheers,
Af.

Last edited by CarlJoseph; 17-03-2011 at 08:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-03-2011, 07:06 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Lower the ISO down to a max of 800 and lengthen your subs, say to 2-5 minutes. You'll see a big difference then....less noise, more piccie
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-03-2011, 07:24 PM
CarlJoseph (Carl)
Registered User

CarlJoseph is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dandenong Ranges
Posts: 265
Thanks Carl I intend to try longer exposures now that I have a intervalometer thingi for my cam. Reminds me, I must practice polar aligning a bit more too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-03-2011, 07:55 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
You can get by in the mean time by taking many subs.
150x 20secs will give you 50 minutes of good data to work with.
Don't forget to put the lens cap on and take darks as well, for the same length of time.
But most of all , HAVE FUN!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-03-2011, 06:48 PM
EddieDog's Avatar
EddieDog (Eddie)
Old Dog

EddieDog is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afro Boy View Post
A few of my first few shots. Certainly not wonderful but I'm pretty glad I managed to capture something. Haven't used any "darks" or anything like that. Keen for any feedback, advice, etc. on how I could improve.

All were taken with my Stellarvue 105 f/6.2 Triplet APO + Canon 450D.

Moon
15th March @ Home
8 x 1/25 second, ISO 400
Attachment 90850


Tarantula Nebula (NGC 2070)
5th March @ The Briars
2 x 5 seconds, 5 x 30 seconds, ISO 1600
Attachment 90849


Eta Carinae (NGC 3372)
5th March @ The Briars
9 x 30 seconds, ISO 1600
Attachment 90848


Cheers,
Af.
Brilliant pics Carl. Make me want an EQ mount.....

Eddie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-03-2011, 06:50 PM
EddieDog's Avatar
EddieDog (Eddie)
Old Dog

EddieDog is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afro Boy View Post
A few of my first few shots. Certainly not wonderful but I'm pretty glad I managed to capture something. Haven't used any "darks" or anything like that. Keen for any feedback, advice, etc. on how I could improve.

All were taken with my Stellarvue 105 f/6.2 Triplet APO + Canon 450D.

Moon
15th March @ Home
8 x 1/25 second, ISO 400
Attachment 90850


Tarantula Nebula (NGC 2070)
5th March @ The Briars
2 x 5 seconds, 5 x 30 seconds, ISO 1600
Attachment 90849


Eta Carinae (NGC 3372)
5th March @ The Briars
9 x 30 seconds, ISO 1600
Attachment 90848


Cheers,
Af.
Me again, Carl. I note there are multiple pics. Do you use stacking software, if so which. Or how did you get the pics.
Eddie
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-03-2011, 07:25 PM
CarlJoseph (Carl)
Registered User

CarlJoseph is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dandenong Ranges
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieDog View Post
Me again, Carl. I note there are multiple pics. Do you use stacking software, if so which. Or how did you get the pics.
Thanks Eddie. I used Deep Sky Stacker to stack the deep sky images. I used Registax to do the moon image. Registax still confuses me but I'll get some more practice and slowly learn more about it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-03-2011, 09:47 PM
EddieDog's Avatar
EddieDog (Eddie)
Old Dog

EddieDog is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afro Boy View Post
Thanks Eddie. I used Deep Sky Stacker to stack the deep sky images. I used Registax to do the moon image. Registax still confuses me but I'll get some more practice and slowly learn more about it.
Thanks Carl, have downloaded both. I can set my Olympus for a short burst of multiple exposures so if clear Friday night, will do some testing
Eddie
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24-03-2011, 02:25 AM
midnight's Avatar
midnight (Darrin)
Always on the road

midnight is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australind, WA
Posts: 891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afro Boy View Post
Thanks Eddie. I used Deep Sky Stacker to stack the deep sky images. I used Registax to do the moon image. Registax still confuses me but I'll get some more practice and slowly learn more about it.
Registax also took me some time and still buggers me occassionally. I was recently pointed to a tip with Registax in that if you are doing a moon stack and you have some field rotation (ie you just point your mount roughly south and basic align and off you go) then it is important to ensure if you multi point align, ensure alignment point 1 and 2 are diagonally opposite your image. It took me 6 months to work out why I was struggling to get any decent stacking. BTW, ensure you check "de-rotate" if you do go this way.

Anyway, just a little pointer I found very useful in stacking the moon in Registax if that helps you . It's also in the manual which quite often I don't read until I'm knackered

Cheers,

Darrin...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24-03-2011, 09:15 AM
CarlJoseph (Carl)
Registered User

CarlJoseph is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dandenong Ranges
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieDog View Post
Thanks Carl, have downloaded both. I can set my Olympus for a short burst of multiple exposures so if clear Friday night, will do some testing
Excellent. Looking forward to seeing your results Eddie. Make sure the exposure isn't too short though (unless it's of the moon). You really need to keep the shutter open for a while for any of the deep sky images to register.

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight View Post
... ensure if you multi point align, ensure alignment point 1 and 2 are diagonally opposite your image. It took me 6 months to work out why I was struggling to get any decent stacking. BTW, ensure you check "de-rotate" if you do go this way.
Great tip! Thanks for that Darrin. I've been wondering about that side of things so good to know how it works now.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-03-2011, 08:26 PM
EddieDog's Avatar
EddieDog (Eddie)
Old Dog

EddieDog is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight View Post
Registax also took me some time and still buggers me occassionally. I was recently pointed to a tip with Registax in that if you are doing a moon stack and you have some field rotation (ie you just point your mount roughly south and basic align and off you go) then it is important to ensure if you multi point align, ensure alignment point 1 and 2 are diagonally opposite your image. It took me 6 months to work out why I was struggling to get any decent stacking. BTW, ensure you check "de-rotate" if you do go this way.

Anyway, just a little pointer I found very useful in stacking the moon in Registax if that helps you . It's also in the manual which quite often I don't read until I'm knackered


Cheers,

Darrin...
Thanks Darrin, sadly can't test on Friday as called in for a night shift! Not sure if Sat is on as have a party, and footy on Sunday....ahhhhh
Eddie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-04-2011, 08:41 PM
CarlJoseph (Carl)
Registered User

CarlJoseph is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dandenong Ranges
Posts: 265
Here's another version of the Tarantula I took last night.

10 subs of 2 minutes each @ 800 ISO

My focus is getting better but I think I definitely need to add some darks to get rid of that (reddish) noise.

Thoughts?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2011_04_07 Tarantula - Final P3.jpg)
212.2 KB29 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement