Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-12-2008, 01:22 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Why are there so many Naglers?

As in eyepieces made by Televue.

If I have read correctly, the range in mm of focal length is:- 2.5, 3.5, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 26, 31.

Surely the differences between, say, 11mm, 12mm and 13mm are so small I cannot see why there needs to be all three? Why a 16mm and a 17mm?

Am I missing something here?

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:05 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
http://www.televue.com/engine/page.asp?cat=2

Maybe they have difficulty getting the focal lengths right and so a lot of extra sizes , with so many elements it would be very tedious and time consuming getting the focal lengths accurate to an acceptable tolerance.


Last edited by Ian Robinson; 25-12-2008 at 12:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:32 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
Smile

look at their prices, would'nt you get as many out there as you could?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-12-2008, 06:50 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick View Post
As in eyepieces made by Televue.

If I have read correctly, the range in mm of focal length is:- 2.5, 3.5, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 26, 31.

Surely the differences between, say, 11mm, 12mm and 13mm are so small I cannot see why there needs to be all three? Why a 16mm and a 17mm?

Am I missing something here?

Eric
Yes, I think that you are...

Within the "Nagler" line are also different configurations of lenses that share/aspire to other criteria....the Nagler brand is known for the 82 degree FOV...within that are the T6, T5 and T4 series. Each of these series has different characteristics such as eye relief...the 16 T5 and 17 T4 are very different animals indeed as are the 11 or 13 T6 versus the 12 T4.

Each of them have different aspects which are maximized/targeted/scope type...while I am not saying that you need them all, I would say that after you get a chance to try the different types you will have a better understanding of the virtues of each type and why there appears to be so many.
Clear Skies and Happy Holidays!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-12-2008, 07:43 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Hi Eric,

Scott is 100% correct. The T4 as distinct from the T5's and T6 series, aspire to meet specific but different design objectives. The T5 and T6 Naglers have shorter eye relief and their focal lengths do not overlap. The T4 Naglers aspire to provide long eye relief and eliminate Angular Magnification Distortion.

Cheers,
John B
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-12-2008, 08:33 PM
mozzie's Avatar
mozzie (Peter)
Registered User

mozzie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: moonee beach
Posts: 2,179
love my naglers as good as it gets bring on the ethoes im saving my money
peter
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-12-2008, 09:12 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Thanks guys, now I'm better educated!

Yes, just checked the Bintel website, I should have thought of the significance of the different Types.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-12-2008, 11:11 PM
Craig.a.c (Craig)
Registered User

Craig.a.c is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wagga NSW.
Posts: 381
2.5! You wouldn't see much with that would ya?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-12-2008, 08:17 AM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig.a.c View Post
2.5! You wouldn't see much with that would ya?
Depends on the scope...remember the formula for magnification...

Magnification = Telescope focal length divided by eyepiece focal length...

I suspect for some scopes it would be brilliant!

Clear Skies...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement