Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-07-2005, 07:43 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,723
July Challenge Object - NGC3918 (Blue Planetary)

Hi all.

We'd love you to take part in the July Observing Challenge. Please post your observing reports and sketches for NGC3918 in this thread. Discussions about the object can also be in this thread.

Please ensure scanned sketches obey the image posting guidelines when you attach them.

For deep-space images of the object, see the "Deep Space" astrophotography forum.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2005, 01:51 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
Another very easy catch from suburbia and visible in my 15x70's if mounted on a tripod. This one shows a nice disc at 166x and at 300x I see an evenly lit blue disc with no internal structure visible in a 6". I have sketched this one as well but it is just a slightly more swollen "star" in a background of stars. Hard to capture its magnificience on paper. What's striking about it is its color.

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-07-2005, 02:21 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
8" f/6 Newt
Pentax 14mm, 10mm & 3.5mm
Seeing 8/10 Trans 8.5/10

02/07/05 @ 19:23 Located using a 14mm XW gives me a starting power of 85x. Sitting relatively alone, on first appearance it wasn't unlike Uranus except with a softer edge. The blue appearance becomes more noticeable the longer you observe, well for me anyways.

Bumping the power up to 120x using a 10mm XW gives a more pleasing view. And benefits with the use of a UHC filter, although no more surface detail could be teased out. One thing I did find noticeable at this power, N3918 appeared to have a faint coma extending some distance out from the disc, around 2-3 disc widths. I didn't seem notice this in either the 14mm or the 3.5mm XW just the 10mm. I'm not sure if this is the halo that is mentioned in the brief. Nor could I resolve a defined outer ring.

Using the 3.5mm gives me 350x and although this frames the planetary nicely, conditions were not optimum for this power. Some surface mottling and there appeared to be 1 possibly two (close together) bright patches that were slightly off center. Not much benif

Difinitely a target to go back to with a larger aperture.

regards
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Limpet Controller
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement