Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-12-2014, 11:48 PM
RobC (Rob)
Registered User

RobC is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Woodford , Queensland , Australia
Posts: 219
Helix and Rosette In Single Shot Colour

These are my attempts at the Helix and Rosette using a SXVR-M25C single shot colour camera. It has highlighted the fact that I need to move to a mono camera to get the detail I want.

Helix - 10 * 20 minute subs + darks + biases + flats

Rosette - 7 * 20 minute subs + darks + biases + flats.

Both were stacked in DSS. The helix was enhanced in PixInSight. The Rosette was asinh stretched and touched up in PixInSight.

I believe there is a lot more detail in the images , but I have no idea how to extract the detail.

Cheers

Rob
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (helix.jpg)
186.3 KB105 views
Click for full-size image (rosette.jpg)
159.8 KB78 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2014, 01:22 AM
Flugel88's Avatar
Flugel88 (Michael)
Registered User

Flugel88 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 253
wow 20 minute subs! what are you using for guiding?
Very nice clean stars in both images well done.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2014, 11:13 AM
RobC (Rob)
Registered User

RobC is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Woodford , Queensland , Australia
Posts: 219
Michael,

In relation to your guiding question ,the following is the Astro Imaging setup I used for both objects.

1. 960 mm ED127 Refractor
2. Skywatcher AZ-EQ6 Mount
3. Celestron OAG
4. PHD2 - Locally modified.
5. Guide Camera - QHY5L-II
6. Guide duration - 3 seconds

Given the fact that I had a good polar alignment and my gear was well balanced , I believe I was able to achieve the 20 minute guides as a result of the modifications I made to PHD2. Prior to the mods I was only able to get passable 10 minute guides. Nobody ever questions the guiding software but blames everything else for bad guides. To me PHD2 seems to overcorrect forcing one to play with a multitude of interacting parameters to correct the over correction.

I made two modifications to PHD2

1. I binned the guide image from 1280*960 to 640*480 . The effect of this is to sharpen the guide stars which tends to help PHD2 as it appears to like nice round definite guide stars.

2. I modified the guide exposure time , so the round trip time of guide exposures matched the setting in the PHD2 dialog. It is interesting to note that a guide exposure of 1 sec with the QHY5L-II takes approximately 1.25 seconds. This additional time represents one quarter of the exposure time.

Cheers

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2014, 04:32 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Good to see some images from you, Rob! If you get a chance to drop a copy of your calibrated masters somewhere I'd be happy to have a quick crack at them to see if I can bring out more detail.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2014, 09:46 AM
RobC (Rob)
Registered User

RobC is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Woodford , Queensland , Australia
Posts: 219
Thanks Rick. I will get the masters together and get them to you.

Cheers

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2014, 10:55 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,478
Nice one Rob beautiful images.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2014, 07:38 PM
Rod771's Avatar
Rod771 (Rod)
Turn the lights off!

Rod771 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Parklea NSW
Posts: 1,207
They're great shots Rob! Looks like you've got your equipment under complete control. Well done!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2014, 10:24 PM
LightningNZ's Avatar
LightningNZ (Cam)
Registered User

LightningNZ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canberra
Posts: 951
Very impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:14 PM
BruceG's Avatar
BruceG (Bruce)
Registered User

BruceG is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 367
Leaving guiding accuracy aside, I am astounded about how dark the sky must be to allow you to achieve 20 minute subs without the skyglow overtaking the detail.
Your not that far away from Brissy and other built up areas. I am amazed!
Bottom line though - a great shot of a fairly dim surface area object. Well done!
Bruce.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-12-2014, 07:20 PM
RobC (Rob)
Registered User

RobC is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Woodford , Queensland , Australia
Posts: 219
Thanks Bruce , Rod, Cam and Dunk .

You should have told me I need to improve my image enhancement skills. Hopefully with a bit of Rick's tutelage I will improve this aspect of my Astro Imaging endeavors.

Rod - I think I have told you before that the Celestron OAG is a very good bit of kit. Thanks for recommending that I buy it. I think Dunk is considering buying one also

Bruce - The helix was imagined in my backyard at Caboolture with a fair bit of sky glow. It is hardly discernible in the raw image. The Rosette was imaged at a dark site location at Blackbutt about 100k's inland. I am trying to get a handle on how my camera performs and what length of exposure times to use for the different sky conditions. I tried a series of 10 minute subs on both objects but these failed dismally. When I went to 20 minutes the detail pooped out.

Cheers

Rob

Rob
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement