Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-02-2025, 09:25 PM
greg46 (Greg)
Registered User

greg46 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 16
Astronomical binoculars vixen 81 hf2 bts vs APM 82mm (not APO version)

Hi
Has anyone experience of these instruments or other options?
I'm looking for a package like the Vixen with mount and tripod but image quality goes first, then ease of operation. I've owned a lot of scopes but with age, need an easy setup and wider field.
Any feedback appreciated.
Cheers
Greg46
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-02-2025, 12:34 AM
Buck
Registered User

Buck is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg46 View Post
Hi
Has anyone experience of these instruments or other options?
I'm looking for a package like the Vixen with mount and tripod but image quality goes first, then ease of operation. I've owned a lot of scopes but with age, need an easy setup and wider field.
Any feedback appreciated.
Cheers
Greg46
Hello Greg,

I've had a fair bit of experience using a variety of binoculars for astronomical observations - too many, some would say.
I own the larger (125mm) Vixens - had them for quite a few years - with the supplied tripod and fork/yoke mount. They are currently on a semi-permanent loan to a fellow enthusiast. The Vixens are achromatic doublets, and although reasonable, they have not updated their configuration for many years. They also have 45 degree eyepiece prisms, and with age comes less flexibility, and observing nearer the zenith is still not ideal.
I note that you are also considering the APM 82mm non APO binoculars. I'm assuming you are referring to BT's with interchangeable eyepieces? If so, I would urge you to go for the APO's if you budget allows, and strongly recommend 90 degree prisms. Your head and neck will thank you.

I currently own - among others - the APM 100mm SD APO 90 degree BT's. And although they are smaller in aperture than my previously mentioned Vixens - 100mm v 125mm, the image quality in the APM's leave the Vixens far behind. I virtually don't use my 'scopes any more, as the views through the BT's are simply stunning and the wide fields fully encompassing. Yes, you can't reach the really high magnifications offered by a quality telescope, but I can regularly get 80x with no convergence issues using quality eyepieces.
If you are going to proceed, I would urge you to consider the APO's and even the 100mm. I use mine on a iOptron strain wave HAZ31 mount that has a specific configuration for mounting large binoculars, but they also work well in a cradle type mount that can have encoders or the brilliant PiFinder that will point you to any object you wish. Regardless, the general ease of setup using big binoculars for astronomy should suit your circumstances as you described.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-02-2025, 06:51 AM
greg46 (Greg)
Registered User

greg46 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 16
Hi Paul
Thank you for the excellent feedback. I suspected the APMs had the quality edge and the 90 degree prisms and the 100mm would be ideal. The mount and tripod info is also very helpful as so far I have been been unable to find a package with mount tripod for the APM.
Thanks again.
Greg46
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement