Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 27-12-2021, 03:33 PM
AdamJL
Registered User

AdamJL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlakPhoenix View Post
The weight advantage is huge. I own a RST-135E and it's amazing how much more I get out now with the lighter mount. Saying that.... Harmonic drive PE is very different to worm drives. It's always changing based on the weight and angle th mount is at (based on torque on drive in current orientation), so can not use PEC/PPEC like you can with EQ6, etc. This means the true error is MUCH worse than what you may be used to. Not saying it can't be overcome, but don't compare error bars of harmonic drives to more traditional drives.


The biggest thing with these mounts is you need very fast guiding exposures to keep on top of the PE as it can move quite fast at some parts of the sky so you need good SNR for your guide cam so it can keep on top of it.
Thanks for the info.

I think this shows a good gap in the market, that a product like the SkyWatcher AZ-GTi hints towards.

I'd love something a little heavier/beefier than the AZ-GTI but with the accuracy of say the EQ6-R in a package not much bigger than the AZ-GTI. Of course, I'd be willing to sacrifice mount weight capacity, and maybe image with 6-7kg of equipment.

That would drive a perfect travel and wide-field setup

This AM5 ticks a lot of boxes, but it might be exactly what I'm after, personally. We'll see.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-01-2022, 07:07 PM
AdamJL
Registered User

AdamJL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,100
Pricing here:
https://www.testar.com.au/collection...uatorial-mount

So yeah, half the price of the Rainbow Astro (less than half compared to the RA Encoder version)... but still, that's a lot of dollaroos. I'll wait to see if SkyWatcher updates the AZ-GTI.

https://www.siderealtrading.com.au/p...ution-encoder/
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 13-01-2022, 02:29 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,830
Well, I put down a $1,000 deposit with Testar for the AM5. Hopefully by the time they arrive there will be some public PHD logs or guiding reviews and I can make a final decision as to whether I should proceed.

Here's hoping
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 13-01-2022, 02:51 PM
AdamJL
Registered User

AdamJL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,100
Nice! Looking forward to seeing/hearing your review, Zuts if you get it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 14-01-2022, 12:00 AM
PaulSthcoast (Paul)
Registered User

PaulSthcoast is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ulladulla NSW
Posts: 287
So,

as luck would have it, tonight looked promising.

I took out my asi air pro and powered it up.

There was a software update....

Nothing unusual about that...it happens.

But then after the update...

THIS was revealed !!!


Paul.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Screenshot_20220114-005307_ASIAIR.jpg)
125.9 KB149 views

Last edited by PaulSthcoast; 14-01-2022 at 01:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 14-01-2022, 05:15 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,665
I asked Testar a few questions about these mounts - mainly prompted by a very good review on YouTube, and received the answers quoted below. Very helpful people there:

1. The quoted 0.5 to 0.8 arc seconds figure is the typical guided tracking accuracy.
2. There is no ( power failure) brake on the DEC axis (like there is on RA.) According to ZWO this is not necessary, but I have reached out to them for more information.
3. The mount is suitable for long exposures, depending on your focal length, guiding configuration, seeing and environmental conditions, etc. Generally I wouldn’t go longer than 10 minute exposures with mounts in this class. If you need greater accuracy, there is always Avalon or 10 Micron (although of course these are a step up in price).
4. The 900mm figure is based on ZWO’s recommendation to keep your pixel scale above 1 arcsecond/pixel, given the common pixel size of around 4um. Lower than that, and you may hit the limits of the guided tracking performance.

I’m a bit puzzled by item 4. I fail to make the leap from the pixel scale of the imaging camera and guiding performance. Still, I admit to spending a lot of time head-scratching these days.


I’m still chewing this over.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 14-01-2022, 05:41 PM
ChrisV's Avatar
ChrisV (Chris)
Registered User

ChrisV is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,737
That guiding accuracy doesn't sound great for the price? No better than my old modded CGEM.
The 900mm'ish focal length makes sense with a standard camera given that guiding accuracy. Its near the arcsec pixel size

Nonetheless, be interesting to see how it performs
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 14-01-2022, 06:09 PM
AnakChan (Sean)
Registered User

AnakChan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Perth
Posts: 371
Yep, personally I wouldn't get a HD mount (unless it has encoders) for a long FL scope. As such putting the FSQ85ED on my HD mount (where with my camera, it's 1.7"/px - so guiding RMS of 0.5-0.8 is within limits).
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 14-01-2022, 09:03 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
I asked Testar a few questions about these mounts - mainly prompted by a very good review on YouTube, and received the answers quoted below. Very helpful people there:


4. The 900mm figure is based on ZWO’s recommendation to keep your pixel scale above 1 arcsecond/pixel, given the common pixel size of around 4um. Lower than that, and you may hit the limits of the guided tracking performance.

I’m a bit puzzled by item 4. I fail to make the leap from the pixel scale of the imaging camera and guiding performance. Still, I admit to spending a lot of time head-scratching these days.


I’m still chewing this over.
I have done nearly all of my imaging on either a TV85 or more recently an Esprit 120. This is more or less my desired image scale and since i don't have a permanent setup really value portability, so the recommended FL is fine for me.

I may even try and trade the Esprit 120 for an Esprit 100 to enhance portability.

If I can get a consistent 0.5 rms then I will be satisfied.

I also have a Edge 9.25 which I use for planetary and here guiding is not an issue, so the mount should be fine for that as well.

I hope
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 17-08-2022, 09:48 AM
AdamJL
Registered User

AdamJL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,100
Anyone got one of these yet? I'm hoping mine comes in the next couple of weeks. Hoping to hear from people with real world experience. I have heard that the performance is very good, at least for AP.
For visual, apparently anything more than 1 star alignment doesn't work.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 17-08-2022, 04:45 PM
TeamG (Glenn)
Registered User

TeamG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Canberra
Posts: 9
Be keen to hear more real world users of this mount. The weight is so appealing.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 17-08-2022, 06:22 PM
AdamJL
Registered User

AdamJL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,100
That it is, Glenn. These strain wave gear mounts sure are shaking up the industry.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 17-08-2022, 09:37 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,909
An AM5 is high on my list for a number of reasons but mainly the amazingly compact size for its weight capability as a travel grab and go (and I am unashamedly beholden to the programming skills of ZWO and their eco-system, so I know it will perform).

A couple of thoughts based on limited knowledge, so feel free to debate:

Harmonic drives have no backlash, and I mean NO backlash, it's why they are used in robotics. Even the best tuned belt driven mount i've seen has a few arc seconds of give which can cause issues on blustery nights. I'd love to see the imaging/guiding results on far less than perfect nights in the field with this mount.

The ZWO uses stepper motors rather than servos like others. Stepper motors lock without power - it's actually quite hard but not impossible to move them. The break on power failure for the RA drive suggests that 13+ kg without counterweights is sufficient to overcome the natural resistance to movement!

Looking forward to some real world reviews!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 18-08-2022, 01:44 PM
Crater101's Avatar
Crater101 (Warren)
Mostly Harmless

Crater101 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroJunk View Post
An AM5 is high on my list for a number of reasons but mainly the amazingly compact size for its weight capability as a travel grab and go (and I am unashamedly beholden to the programming skills of ZWO and their eco-system, so I know it will perform).

A couple of thoughts based on limited knowledge, so feel free to debate:

Harmonic drives have no backlash, and I mean NO backlash, it's why they are used in robotics. Even the best tuned belt driven mount i've seen has a few arc seconds of give which can cause issues on blustery nights. I'd love to see the imaging/guiding results on far less than perfect nights in the field with this mount.

The ZWO uses stepper motors rather than servos like others. Stepper motors lock without power - it's actually quite hard but not impossible to move them. The break on power failure for the RA drive suggests that 13+ kg without counterweights is sufficient to overcome the natural resistance to movement!

Looking forward to some real world reviews!

Given the issues I had with my copy of the recent Star Adventurer GTi, I'm also interested in some real world reviews of this.



I don't have a lot of knowledge in relation to the "strain wave" system though. Anybody care to recommend a good article / video on this?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 18-08-2022, 01:49 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crater101 View Post
I don't have a lot of knowledge in relation to the "strain wave" system though. Anybody care to recommend a good article / video on this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Qid...JetpackAcademy

This worked for me!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 19-08-2022, 02:24 PM
Crater101's Avatar
Crater101 (Warren)
Mostly Harmless

Crater101 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroJunk View Post

Thank you kind Sir. Much appreciated. I'll let you know if I can find more.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 19-08-2022, 05:47 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlakPhoenix View Post
T Harmonic drive PE is very different to worm drives. It's always changing based on the weight and angle th mount is at (based on torque on drive in current orientation), so can not use PEC/PPEC like you can with EQ6, etc. This means the true error is MUCH worse than what you may be used to. Not saying it can't be overcome, but don't compare error bars of harmonic drives to more traditional drives.


The biggest thing with these mounts is you need very fast guiding exposures to keep on top of the PE as it can move quite fast at some parts of the sky so you need good SNR for your guide cam so it can keep on top of it.
This is very interesting, a rare look into actual user feedback.Pretty damning in IMO. On Testars web site "very low periodic errors (within ±20 arc-seconds) make the AM5 an excellent mount for astrophotography". thats a bit of a stretch . A very specific use case, the need for very fast guiding exposures. If this had output encoders, and ZWO could actually get these encoders to work reliably with guiding to get PE (or it seems just high non PE errors) down this would become a killer mount.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 19-08-2022, 08:20 PM
AdamJL
Registered User

AdamJL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,100
The high PE is not really an issue. On Cloudy nights, most users are getting between 0.4-0.6RMS for guiding and good star shapes. There's not much else that matters really. There are occasional spikes, but really the mount seems to be performing very well from what everyone has experienced so far.

My one will be here end of September unfortunately. Still a long wait to get my hands on one.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 19-08-2022, 09:20 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,877
Yes I would PE can be jagged and hard to correct or it can be smooth and easy to correct.

If fast guiding is working well then perhaps the PE is smooth. Just a guess.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 20-08-2022, 08:02 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,345
Had mine a while now, and absolutely love it. So much that my humongous CEM70 is packed away possibly to sell.
Being able to pick it up and move about the property fully loaded is a boon.
Very happy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement