Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Poll: Which mount would you choose in my position?
Poll Options
Which mount would you choose in my position?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-12-2017, 11:21 AM
Granada
The truth is out there

Granada is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 149
EQ6-R vs HEQ5

I'm looking to start doing some astrophotography, and I'd like to get a decent setup which will last for some time. I've settled on a SkyWatcher Black Diamond ED100 OTA with a HEQ5 Pro mount.

However recently I came across a very knowledgeable dealer who stocks the mount that I want, but was trying to convince me that the EQ6-R is a much better choice because it's belt driven, among other improvements over its predecessor.

I have no doubt that the EQ6-R is better, but my issue is with the nearly $800 difference between the two mounts. That will blow my budget way over. So I'm wondering whether it's a good investment in the long run? If I can be convinced that it's worth it, I'll go for the EQ6-R mount, but at the moment I don't really know how much more advantageous this mount is.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2017, 11:27 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,143
EQ6-R would carry higher payload and should have better tracking/backlash characteristics being belt driven.

The SW 100 being f/9 is not a good choice for AP...not because it isn't a good scope (it is), but f/9 is slow photographically. Look for a faster triplet, f/5 - f/6.

Oh, and AP is not an inexpensive hobby, but everything is relative!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2017, 11:29 AM
barx1963's Avatar
barx1963 (Malcolm)
Bright the hawk's flight

barx1963 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mt Duneed Vic
Posts: 3,934
I had both a HEQ5 and the alt az version of the NEQ6 that also features belt drives. Sold the HEQ5 as it is very weight limited. Provided you are happy with the weight of the 6, it will handle this scope with ease and give you plenty of future proofing quite apart from the benefits from the belt drive (eg more precise, much quieter which is important if slewing a scope at 2am in your suburban backyard).

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2017, 11:29 AM
Granada
The truth is out there

Granada is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 149
Thanks Camelopardalis, would you have a recommendation for a better scope under $1000?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2017, 11:43 AM
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy (Tony)
Local Korean Millennial

that_guy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charleville
Posts: 2,057
are you deadset on refractors for imaging? While they may be more convenient, newts usually provide a better value if you're just starting out. It just requires a bit more attention. If you are set on a refractor and dont mind buying second hand, you can grab a decent 5" triplet from North group, Nanjiang or whatever name they're going by for $1000.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-12-2017, 11:51 AM
Granada
The truth is out there

Granada is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 149
Not particularly dead set on anything that_guy. I've also been recommended a Guan Sheng GS-600 8” f/4 Newtonian OTA as an alternative. It's cheaper than the SWBDED100. Would it be a better option? It's slightly more awkward in terms of portability but not that much.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-12-2017, 12:21 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,904
The EQ6-R is a better mount, no doubt about it. I’ve got both an EQ6 and a HEQ5; the EQ6 is just better.
As with everything though, it is whether the extra money is worth it for you.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-12-2017, 12:38 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,586
The EQ6 can carry more, will probably track better (belts), have less backlash and will allow better upgrades to your OTA and equipment in the future.

The HEQ5Pro can be a good performer, but older gear driven mounts were prone to significant variability between individual mounts (luck of the draw). My HEQ5Pro with gears still blows away my belt modded EQ6 for tracking (RA periodic error variation), however this is probably a statistical oddity. Don't plan on putting more than 10kg loads on the HEQ5 for astrophotography.

There is the issue of how long you'll be active in the hobby and how easy the gear is to set up. The HEQ5 is significantly lighter than the 6. If you'll be setting up frequently rather than permanent pier/observatory weight/size is a significant issue. The telescope you use the most and get best value from is the one you can be bothered setting up!

If you know you'll be in the hobby a long time then more expensive quality purchases generally pay off over time (versus constant upgrades). Unfortunately time travel is necessary to clarify that last bit
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-12-2017, 01:10 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,023
Some of the images I took with my ED100 are my favorites. Plus you can flatten/reduce it for not much cost.

I voted HEQ5 (the one and only lol) as I found it better than the old NEQ6...I have nil experience with the new belt driven model.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-12-2017, 01:14 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Granada View Post
Thanks Camelopardalis, would you have a recommendation for a better scope under $1000?
Id suggest going for something like an 80mm f/6, while maybe just over your budget new, these are popular scopes and come up on the used market relatively often. A reducer could knock it down to about f/5. IMO itd be a much easier scope to get pleasing results from get started.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-12-2017, 01:39 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
Id suggest going for something like an 80mm f/6, while maybe just over your budget new, these are popular scopes and come up on the used market relatively often. A reducer could knock it down to about f/5. IMO itd be a much easier scope to get pleasing results from get started.
Just adding to what Dunk is trying to explain here for benefits of the shorter focal ratio:

- Less nights to get a decent image on a single object (F5 versus F9)
- Better signal to noise (you'll probably get by longer with something like a DSLR before needing a CCD , particularly on brighter DSOs)
- Guiding is generally far easier at lower focal lengths, which goes a long way towards reducing your frustration factor when starting out
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-12-2017, 07:53 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Granada the 100mm f/9 refractor is a poor choice for AP. A much better choice would be this 6” maksutov newtonian http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=162004,
And you have the change to buy the EQ6-R mount.

You could conceivably use an 8” f/4 newtonian but that is likely to be more challenging.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-12-2017, 08:18 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 7,308
I am aghast of the notion being pedaled that belt drives are superior in some way to a precision gear. A crap gear, maybe, but suggesting there is precision in rubberised molds? Seriously?

This is a myth.

Belts are mass produced, with modest precision, stretch, compress and are a cheap solution in transfering torque to a worm gear.

Sure,if linked from a motor ahead of a reduction gearbox, the effects are trivial, but to praise a belt as being superior is just nuts.

Last edited by Peter Ward; 02-12-2017 at 08:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-12-2017, 09:01 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,055
Context is everything, Peter. The subject at hand is Skywatcher HEQ5 vs EQ6-R. We're not talking Astro-physics mounts. I would not be at all surprised to hear that a belt outperforms a spur gear in low-end mounts.

For the OP, out of these two I'd be inclined to go with the EQ6-R. I'd also second Dunk's recommendation of a short tube refractor. You'll get much better results much faster going down this route than going down the Newt / Mak-newt path.

Astrophotography is a challenging hobby, you'll be challenged enough starting out.... refractors essentially either work or not, and if not, you send them back. Mirror-based scopes require a *lot* of tweaking.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-12-2017, 03:21 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
aPPLES VRS oRANGES
Cap lock OFF .


I have and use my Celestron Ci700 ,
a G11 .


People said the same things in 1989 about G11's and Ci700's
,
Guess what , my Ci700 is still going strong ,
as is a few old ( Yes You ) mates G11's
are still as good as the day they were opened .

For your information the tripod legs in this photo are 3 inches ( 76mm ) in dianeter .


Personally a good HEQ5 would be as good as an EQ6 for what you want ( NEED ) .

Brian
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey View Post
Context is everything, Peter. The subject at hand is Skywatcher HEQ5 vs EQ6-R. We're not talking Astro-physics mounts. I would not be at all surprised to hear that a belt outperforms a spur gear in low-end mounts.

For the OP, out of these two I'd be inclined to go with the EQ6-R. I'd also second Dunk's recommendation of a short tube refractor. You'll get much better results much faster going down this route than going down the Newt / Mak-newt path.

Astrophotography is a challenging hobby, you'll be challenged enough starting out.... refractors essentially either work or not, and if not, you send them back. Mirror-based scopes require a *lot* of tweaking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (WP_20170106_19_34_49_Pro (2).jpg)
209.3 KB58 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-12-2017, 03:38 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
FYI , that; my 127mm f8 iStar frak ,,, Sweet bit of glass .
note the position of the CW , An EQ6 would not be even be in the door .

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-12-2017, 03:46 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Oi ? Wa ? franken scopes .

Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Some of the images I took with my ED100 are my favorites. Plus you can flatten/reduce it for not much cost.

I voted HEQ5 (the one and only lol) as I found it better than the old NEQ6...I have nil experience with the new belt driven model.

Last edited by sheeny; 03-12-2017 at 08:59 AM. Reason: image removed due to profanity
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-12-2017, 04:20 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Last night

Brian.

Last edited by brian nordstrom; 03-12-2017 at 05:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-12-2017, 10:24 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 7,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey View Post
Context is everything, Peter. The subject at hand is Skywatcher HEQ5 vs EQ6-R. We're not talking Astro-physics mounts.....
I was actually thinking about a Losmandy G-11....The new 2017 revision is has had several refinements and upgrades, with OPB optioned G-11 users reporting periodic errors as low as +/- 3 arc sec. Sure, a modest price premium Chinese products, but a lot of bang for buck IMHO....and no belts
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-12-2017, 11:31 AM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,401
I used the ED100 and HEQ5 for a couple of years and with the Flattener/ reducer it worked fine, though a little slow. A great way to learn imaging and you will get good outcomes.

You havnt mentioned what your imaging with, DSLR or CCD, but you need to think about whether or not you are going to be guiding as that will add to the total cost. You might get to the EQ6 but still not get great results if you are going unguided due to budget constraints.


I dont think there is anyone on this forum who has not gone through mount upgrades for imaging. Not a biggie as you would recover some of your initial investment.

Given you are on a budget, either the Mak Newt suggested or the ED100 or the ED80 would get you started on the HEQ5 and give you wiggle room to add guiding later on. You might not get that wiggle going straight to the EQ6R. All depends on the outcomes you are after.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
eq6, heq5 pro

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Limpet Controller
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement