#1  
Old 30-04-2020, 09:08 PM
luka's Avatar
luka
Unregistered User

luka is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,164
Flats - how many

A "simple" question, what is a good number of flats to take and why?

Wherever I read about it the flats get put in the same basket as the darks and the biases. For example, the DSS page talks about all three at the same time and about needing up to a 100 (of each) for the best results.

Now, in the dark/bias images the dark/bias signal has a similar order of magnitude as the noise. Making lots of images will smooth out the noise and leave almost only the dark/bias signal. Flats on the other hand have a very large light component, much larger than the noise. So why do we need lots of flats?

Just trying to reduce time standing in the cold

Thanks in advance,
Luka
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-04-2020, 09:11 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
I routinely do 80 flats per filter. They range from 3s to 20s each. The more the better. Less noise. I do the same amount of "dark" flats.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-04-2020, 09:29 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
That makes me feel pretty lazy, I usually do 16 or 25 flats and the same for flat darks and darks.
A number of years ago I was doing some research into what makes a good flat for scientific purposes and what came out of that was that the ideal is to hit 1,000,000 electrons.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2020, 05:50 AM
trent_julie's Avatar
trent_julie
Registered User

trent_julie is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 581
Hi Colin,
Did you put that research into a paper that I can read? it would be really interesting!

Cheers,

Trent
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2020, 06:30 AM
The_bluester's Avatar
The_bluester (Paul)
Registered User

The_bluester is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kilmore, Australia
Posts: 3,342
I do 100 flats and 100 dark flats, the ASI294 is not the easierst camera in the word on calibration so I aim for the flats to be as high quality as I can, 100 averages the read noise very well.


I couldn't do it without a flat panel, I do my flats at ten seconds so sky flats would be a problem. The benefit of that is that I can reuse a master dark flat for a fairly long time as I know what my flat exposure time will be. I don't use bias frames, the ASI294 does not perform well with them due to peculiarities in it's setup.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2020, 07:56 AM
The_bluester's Avatar
The_bluester (Paul)
Registered User

The_bluester is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kilmore, Australia
Posts: 3,342
I did see it on some ASI6200 darks I have seen, but you have to stretch the data so hard to see it that it is IMO not all that relevant, I have seen plenty of images from CCD cams showing at least as much (And often more) banding than changes form sub to sub.

I reckon the best approach is just to shoot lots of subs to average it out with the rest of the read noise.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2020, 08:18 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
It was just a project for my course so nothing out there.
Others research was published in the age of high well depth CCD where 1,000,000 electrons was required for the 8-20 e- detectors being used with well depths averaging 100,000 e- or more. Getting 1,000,000 electrons with a KAF-16803 is easy because a 50% well depth is 55,000 e- so 18 exposures. Doing it with an ASI1600 is a lot more painful as you need 2,000 exposures at Unity Gain It has 25x less noise though so you can do a respectable amount of exposures.

The most important part of flat fielding though is good calibration. A bad dark flat will destroy your flat fielding no matter how many flats you have
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-05-2020, 08:47 AM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
That makes me feel pretty lazy, I usually do 16 or 25 flats and the same for flat darks and darks.
A number of years ago I was doing some research into what makes a good flat for scientific purposes and what came out of that was that the ideal is to hit 1,000,000 electrons.
You feel lazy? Hrm, I've been doing 10 flats and 20 darks.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-05-2020, 12:12 PM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
I haven't done any flats for 18 months now .

My QHY-12 (OSC) and Coma corrector are always clean so I never have dust bunnies.
I just use the Startools Wipe module to fix up any vignetting.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-05-2020, 12:58 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,789
I do much less. 3 or 5 flats. I suppose it depends on how important the noise level is. The frames are only a few seconds each so dark current is minimal compared to the signal. Mine are used for spectra rather than pictures. This means I'm not stretching the images much to get the very dim regions.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-05-2020, 04:29 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,877
I do between 3 and 6 and they are dusk flats with a white cloth over the end of the scope. I have to move fast as the light fades and you don't have that much time to capture flats for 7 filters some of which have both 1x1 binning and 2x2 binning.

I tend to only do one set of 3 to 6 for RGB usually the red filter.

I don't see any downside.

Total exposure time is more important than a little bit of noise coming from your flats.

I also tend not to use bias for flats or if I do its a separate bias not a flat with a bias subtracted so I can not use it if I am not getting a good flat correction.

On my CCDs I go for around 20,000 ADU. That seems to work well.
I tried using 30,000 but they usually overcorrect. 17-20,000 ADU seems to match the lights nicely and correct the vignetting well and any dust bunnies.

I also prefer to clean my filters and CCD glass rather than rely on flats to remove dust bunnies because they don't always without fail do a good job of that.

Cleanliness is next to perfect imagingness!

Greg.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-05-2020, 10:37 PM
luka's Avatar
luka
Unregistered User

luka is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,164
Thanks to everybody for replying. Got some food for thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
flats

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement