#1  
Old 05-05-2020, 08:55 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Filters and Moonlight

Hi all. For 7nm SII, Ha and OIII filters, what percentage of Moonlight can they be imaged in before Moonlight becomes a problem. I've heard a few different things. Obviously proximity of Moon to target will be a thing also.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2020, 11:29 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,425
Kevin, I use the Astronomik 6nm set, so very similar.

I've found I need to stay well away from the Moon, even in Ha, like 45+ degrees away. OIII is futile with any significant illumination of the Moon because of how it washes out the sky. Around full Moon is a forget-it situation for me. Anyone who says the Moon doesn't reflect Ha obviously hasn't tried it!

And then there are the gradients. Depending on the filter, the Moon can create additional gradients in an image due to it's floodlighting, on top of any local gradients from LP and horizon-dependent gradients.

I'd be interested in hearing from anyone with the 3nm for Ha, out of curiosity. Regardless, they're cost prohibitive for me at the moment, especially with the current exchange rate
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2020, 01:45 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
As Dunk has said, forget shooting Oiii with the Moon up. I have shot Ha and Sii when the Moon was up, but my rule was to stay 90 degrees away if possible, so no moonlight can spill into the front light shield and reflect around. And forget doing any imaging around the full Moon, there are plenty of other nights, and the stars aren't going anywhere, don't rush, it only compromises your final result.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2020, 08:12 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Thanks Dunk and Glen. I've noticed even in Ha the sky brightness creeping up as the Moon waxes. The thing is, I swear it's clear more often during a full Moon. I don't want to waste the sky. Wish 3nm were cheaper.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2020, 08:22 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
I generally use the full moon time to test things out, rather than imaging. Having said that I was even too lazy to do that tonight.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-05-2020, 09:06 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
I suppose I could always image planets, but they are out rather early.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-05-2020, 10:41 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
I find that the best thing to photograph during a full moon is either really bright nebula where the moon has no real effect. Either that or shoot star clusters.

To give an example, this Eta Carina image was shot under full moon from my bortle 7 backyard. It's bright enough that a lot of the nebulosity isn't hugely affected. Yes, it would have stronger signal and less noise under dark moonless skies but you take what you're given sometimes.

As another example, NGC 253 was not only shot under a near full moon but the moon was only some 20º away if memory serves; this kinda makes the light polluted backyard meaningless. I did this mostly because I was curious about how close I could get to the moon and still achieve a result.

Star clusters are the best to chase though as light pollution and the moon don't do anything other than potentially wreck some havoc with colour calibration as you're not worrying about the background signal.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-05-2020, 11:14 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Thanks Colin, your full Moon examples look like my no moon shots. But I was thinking more about narrow band. You have the 3nm filters. Does the Moon still affect 3nm Ha much?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-05-2020, 11:19 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
I haven’t done a comparison between full moon and no moon with the 3nm filters. I definitely would attempt OIII or possibly even SII as it’s already quite faint. Ha is always going to be stronger so I guess it would depend on what you’re chasing. If it’s a bright Ha object as opposed to attempting to capture the faintest of details.

I’ve never let the moon get in the way of some great Ha data!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-05-2020, 08:03 AM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
The thing is, I swear it's clear more often during a full Moon. I don't want to waste the sky. Wish 3nm were cheaper.
Yep! I guarantee Murphy is in charge of the weather

Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Thanks Colin, your full Moon examples look like my no moon shots. But I was thinking more about narrow band. You have the 3nm filters. Does the Moon still affect 3nm Ha much?
I purchased a top of the range $$ 3nm Chroma O3 filter so can I shoot whenever it's clear - for instance this image was recently taken under a full moon.

Astrodon or Chroma are the filter brand kings for a very good reason, you get what you pay for. I have also found Chroma to be as good as and better priced than the Dons.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-05-2020, 10:33 AM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
I haven't really done that much narrowband imaging... it was mostly a thing that I did when the moon was more than 50% full and I didn't want to image galaxies.

I've been pretty happy with my narrowband data, often taken on or near full moon with total disregard to how far away the moon is from the target. You can definitely get good results.

Is it a good idea to try and go deep, digging for faint nebulae in such conditions? Probably not... but can you get usable, even great results with many targets? Absolutely!

I think people worry too much about the moon... if it's clear and I can be bothered, I'm imaging something. Just try to pick the target that will be compromised the least by the moon.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-05-2020, 10:36 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Thanks Andy. Wow those dragons are nice. Seems as though I liked it before, which may have inspired me to have a go at the dragons and 6164 in the same field also. I'm doing it with an F4.5 ED80 and ASI 183mm Pro, but it doesn't look as nice as yours. I need much more data.

And that was with full Moon... So possible with good quality 3nm filters.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-05-2020, 10:38 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Thanks Lee. Yeah I think that's the thing, to image something even with full Moon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement