Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-04-2015, 07:41 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,837
M20 Trifid Nebula

M20 Trifid nebula taken from the Snake Valley Astro camp in Vic Australia.
The dark site really helped as this has just 2 x 15min Lum Subs and 2x5min RGB all bin1.
Higher res here

http://www.astrobin.com/full/169235/C/

All processing done in Startools

10inch F4
NEQ6Pro
STF8300m

feedback welcome

Cheers
Alistair
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Trifid-LRBG-st7 (Medium).jpg)
181.3 KB106 views

Last edited by alistairsam; 12-04-2015 at 04:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2015, 08:15 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
wow, that's looking really good Alistair - colour and detail are excellent.

For feedback, stars are slightly variable in shape, maybe a tiny bit of tilt somewhere? It may be worth using the Startools shape repair. Noise could be fixed with more data. These are minor quibbles though - its an excellent image.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2015, 09:28 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Great shot, Al. Looks like it could have been taken with a large RC scope
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2015, 10:47 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,837
Thanks Ray, Rick

I'm very happy with it mainly cause it shows the potential of my gear and I learned so much when processing this, trying out different methods in the layers Module and different ways of making masks and noise reduction and so on. So an experiment really.

I've hypertuned my eq6 where I'm getting pretty good guiding, about 0.16 rms at 1m FL and the pec is actually helping the AO at 2hz. All this results in Images that are far sharper than when I started out with the same mount and scope.

As for the stars, yes I know I have minor tilt somewhere. Will weed it out.

Appreciate the comments.

Alistair
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2015, 11:14 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,610
Hi Alistair,
looks good to me.
I think too many stars have exceeded the well depth -
they look over exposed.
Would 5 minute frames for luminance have been better with the same time?
A 10" f4 really grabs the light so it shouldn't need 15 minute exposures on such a bright target.
A 15 minute Ha frame would have been interesting though.

I can't wait to have a go on this one when my 10" f4 mirror arrives.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2015, 09:47 AM
NOMH (John)
Registered User

NOMH is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: California
Posts: 65
Lots of nebulosity in the Alistair! Looks great and you've done well with so few exposures.

I find my stars are always a problem for me. I think my exposures are fine for the target but the stars do over saturate and grow in size. I want to try shooting 30-60 second images just for the stars and then figure out how to swap them.

JB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2015, 12:24 AM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Alistair,
looks good to me.
I think too many stars have exceeded the well depth -
they look over exposed.
Would 5 minute frames for luminance have been better with the same time?
A 10" f4 really grabs the light so it shouldn't need 15 minute exposures on such a bright target.
A 15 minute Ha frame would have been interesting though.

I can't wait to have a go on this one when my 10" f4 mirror arrives.

cheers
Allan
hi Allan,

I wanted the damn Jet, so went for 15 minutes. but also because I go by Ray's method of a target ADU for the background.
mine's around 3300 and with this 15min, its 3370 odd.
I think Ray's thread has some mention of not worrying about the well depth. can't remember.
This is the processed Lum
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ky05rj60vw...tack7.png?dl=0


Quote:
Originally Posted by NOMH View Post
Lots of nebulosity in the Alistair! Looks great and you've done well with so few exposures.

I find my stars are always a problem for me. I think my exposures are fine for the target but the stars do over saturate and grow in size. I want to try shooting 30-60 second images just for the stars and then figure out how to swap them.

JB
Thanks. I think they can be controlled when processing.

Cheers
Alistair
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Trifid-L-stack7 (Custom).jpg)
209.0 KB19 views
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2015, 09:02 AM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Hi, Alistair,

I can see the Herbig-Haro jet, so mission successful.

Might be worth posting the dropbox version as a 1:1 original pixels full resolution high quality jpeg, say compression set at 10 out of 12 PhotoShop "goodness" units (the file might be about a megabyte), rather than as a PNG.

I agree with you that for an object like the Trifid, the nebulosity, and something of especial astrophysical interest like the HH jet, is far more important than the stars. (For something like a globular cluster, the reverse would be the case.)

Keep 'em coming.

Best,
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2015, 10:14 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by alistairsam View Post
hi Allan,

I wanted the damn Jet, so went for 15 minutes. but also because I go by Ray's method of a target ADU for the background.
mine's around 3300 and with this 15min, its 3370 odd.
I think Ray's thread has some mention of not worrying about the well depth. can't remember.
This is the processed Lum
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ky05rj60vw...tack7.png?dl=0

Cheers
Alistair

Hi Alistair,
I understand - yes - you got the jet so you achieved what you wanted.

My method of attack on this target will be to adjust the exposure time
so that the 2 center bright stars are clearly separated &
then I'll take as many multiples of that exposure time - as I can.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-04-2015, 10:04 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,006
Great looking photo Alistair.

Well composed with excellent detail and nice, smooth colours.


Ross.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
m20

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement