Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 27-06-2016, 04:26 PM
tinymos
Registered User

tinymos is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
I'd prefer all to be out in the open on the forum for transparency, some of us have a life and no time to skype.
Can you answer my questions on here? If not then I'm not convinced.
Hi Nikolas, sure I think we would need some time to produce such a video. We thought that Skype would be better as it is real time and your queries can be better answered. Do let us know if you're still keen.

Team TinyMOS
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 27-06-2016, 05:26 PM
kittenshark (Cheryl-Ann Tan)
Registered User

kittenshark is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: South brisbane
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinymos View Post
Hello everyone,

We are a Singaporean based startup that developed the Tiny1 - World's first Astronomy camera made Small, Smart and Social. Traditionally, astrophotography is an expensive hobby with a steep learning curve that may deter many from picking it up. We believe in making astronomy and astrophotography easy and accessible to all, which is why we made the Tiny1

You can find us at http://tinymos.com while the Tiny1's specifications can be found here: http://bit.ly/tiny1_specs. If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to reply to this thread or email us at support@tinymos.com. We are more than happy to address them.

Let us grow the Astronomy community together.

Clear skies,
Team TinyMOS
Hi, this looks interesting! I know it's a long shot, but would you at some point be interested in supplying these in a specialist astronomy shop? I'm trying to build up a range of products to appeal to a beginner astrophotographer but there's not a lot out there that suits complete beginners. I'll be in Singapore later this year for family events, would like to meet and check your project out. PM me.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 27-06-2016, 06:37 PM
tinymos
Registered User

tinymos is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by kittenshark View Post
Hi, this looks interesting! I know it's a long shot, but would you at some point be interested in supplying these in a specialist astronomy shop? I'm trying to build up a range of products to appeal to a beginner astrophotographer but there's not a lot out there that suits complete beginners. I'll be in Singapore later this year for family events, would like to meet and check your project out. PM me.
Hello Cheryl-Ann,

Yes we will be retailing the Tiny1 some time around 2017 Q2. We developed the Tiny1 because we wanted to make astrophotography accessible to the masses by providing them with a simple to use astronomy camera. Glad to know we share the same goal

Sure, the founders would be more than happy to meet you and demo the Tiny1. I'll PM you the details.

Team TinyMOS
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-07-2016, 06:58 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
I'd prefer all to be out in the open on the forum for transparency, some of us have a life and no time to skype.
Can you answer my questions on here? If not then I'm not convinced.
I agree, when its released there will be tons of review videos and gimmick or not will be revealed. Seems to be a strange product to me. Astronomers are often older demographic, not always the most computer literate and therefore not interested in social media stuff but tend to be highly intelligent. Taking good pics is more important than having gear linked to our phones or posting stuff quickly to facebook. The early supporters will quickly make it known if TinyMOS have been misleading people or the product is total crap or not. So its up to them to do it right. Its not like anyone can possibly recommend them or their products at this stage, so you'll just have to wait and see.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-07-2016, 04:27 PM
Icearcher's Avatar
Icearcher (Chris)
Registered User

Icearcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Adelaide - Inner West
Posts: 163
Interesting idea.

Playing devils advocate for a second, how would you compare this to some of the point and shoot cameras on the market that are known to be quite good at night time shooting? for example the Sony RX100?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-07-2016, 12:50 PM
tinymos
Registered User

tinymos is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icearcher View Post
Interesting idea.

Playing devils advocate for a second, how would you compare this to some of the point and shoot cameras on the market that are known to be quite good at night time shooting? for example the Sony RX100?
Hello Chris,

The Tiny1 is designed to simplify the capturing process by providing integrated tools within the device itself. It provides a huge value to beginners and those looking to pick up astrophotography as a hobby. Depending on the skill level of the user, one can always extract more performance out of any system.

Team TinyMOS
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 22-08-2017, 07:25 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
First up, sorry to Canberrans for the rain last night, my Tiny1 arrived yesterday. Interesting beast and a variety of disappointments and maybe I'll never be able to make best use of it to be fairer to it.

Easy ones first, build is damn solid and the lenses seem well built too.

Thats about it, packaging it good for the camera but doesn't allow for lenses/accessories. Not printed manual or even slip of paper to be found to get you started. Finish on the camera makes it slippery to hold, for someone with only one working arm this is VERY concerning especially as there is no wrist or neck strap for the camera either despite having mount holes for them.

The camera itself only has an on button and a shutter button you need to be a body builder to press so forget a nice light touch click or holding it steady by hand. And yes it seems capable of taking hand held night shots technically. The touch screen has no alternate shutter button so it MUST be paired with an Android phone it seems. NO Iphone support for this thing and iphone is all i have, so it looks like I'll be forced to buy an android phone (No idea what specs) just to use the Tiny1. Let alone configure it, it has almost nothing to configure in its menu at all on the camera itself so i can only presume its all in the android app but since I can't use it I cant tell for sure.

its screen shows a live view superimpossed with a star chart and you can search for items and it will direct you. IF you are in the northern hemisphere it seems. it has GPS always on so it should know at least which hemisphere you're in. so the star chart is showing me an incorrect view so I cant comment on its accuracy beyond its completely inaccurate right now. Again, no menu items on camera to configure so i assume its in the android app I think I mentioned I cant use either.

Image quality, well it does take photos, does save in DNG and RAW formats (only its DNG will load into PixInsight, dont know about photoshop ) and does capture stars hand held. This morning the sky was clear but lightening when I got to try shooting outside so no dark sky shots yet and no file to show as i was waiting for taxi to work. My quick tests last night from the garage (it was raining so i didnt take it out into the wet) showed promise but the pictures are extremely grainy to put it mildly.

My first impressions are this is not a camera for astronomers, its a camera for android fanbois who drool over instagram and think facebook is deep and meaning full. Maybe if the decide to support iphone so i can at least configure and take time lapsed shots with it (I was really caught out by the camera having virtually no controls at all , it requires a damn phone, cant even be used via usb.) I does appear to be for people looking for small dimension shots to send to social media rather than for good high resolution photos. As a simple travel camera for astronomers to pic up a few shots I would say look to one of the quality compact cameras on the market instead, this is not a "self contained" camera and having to use another device to use it means you have to have two high drain devices and keep them charged so not really practical for travel being forced to have two gadget when it should have been one and if you got lenses too its more stuff to lose and figure out how to pack.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 22-08-2017, 01:20 PM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
Had a bit more of a play found a few more settings. Camera app keeps crashing, cant set up wifi access point at all, some menu areas are dead ends you cant back out of, i think i saw something that might be an intervalometer but cant find it again. At this point even at the early bird price i paid it wasnt worth the money and they havent delivered on their pr promises.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 23-08-2017, 11:15 AM
simon_rl's Avatar
simon_rl (Simon)
Registered User

simon_rl is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St Clair, NSW
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by sil View Post
Had a bit more of a play found a few more settings. Camera app keeps crashing, cant set up wifi access point at all, some menu areas are dead ends you cant back out of, i think i saw something that might be an intervalometer but cant find it again. At this point even at the early bird price i paid it wasnt worth the money and they havent delivered on their pr promises.
Thanks for the write up Sil. This is very disappointing, I ordered one not long after the they first came up on the funding website and I am in the next batch to be sent out.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 23-08-2017, 01:14 PM
PCH's Avatar
PCH (Paul)
Registered User

PCH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,296
If it's not a rude question guys, how much were they?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 25-08-2017, 06:21 AM
simon_rl's Avatar
simon_rl (Simon)
Registered User

simon_rl is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St Clair, NSW
Posts: 44
Paul, all cost details are in the link below.
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/t...y/x/14713005#/
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 25-08-2017, 07:05 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
I had a response from their support saying the intervalometer is in the camera but wont say where. With further looking I still cant find it and I even try looking in all the items that don't seem obvious and found a bunch of "This feature not yet implemented" messages yet.

I tried to get a solar photo yesterday out of it. The solar filter is a black/glass type white light filter or maybe just a deep neutral density filter. It slips over the end of the telephone lens (not screw in like a filter) and has no cap to protect it either. didnt come in a plastic protective case either. Found it very hard to try to tell if I was in focus, the image was constantly overexposed on the screen.

The only device I can find with the same sensor size is the iphone 5s and my gut feeling is they sourced a chinese fake iphone and installed a single android app on it, which crashes. I think they could have just made this a phone app to run on any phone with better hardware. I hope others find it more useful and get their monies worth, but I am not feeling it, just feeling ripped off at this point. maybe clear skies tonight or tomorrow night to try for some wide angle shots to show off.

I think it cost around $600 for the camera with wide and telephoto lenses, nikon lens adapter and eyepiece adapter. Yes technically it could be used during the day but its too problematic to bother, the screen is horrible to use in daylight and its hard to tell its turned itself off.

Such a shame, I had been looking forward to getting it for so long and hoped it would be a time saver to help me get outside more often but no.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 27-08-2017, 08:36 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
files

I uploaded a shot in jpeg as its saved on the camera, zero processing, see the comments to my astrobin account, it would save here without processing.

resized it would probably look good on facebook (well its billed as a social media astro camera), but astrometry failed to plate solve. i have five such shots and pixinsight and astripxel processor fail to automatically register the images. flats are horribly vignetted an made manual processing worse (see attachment below).
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (integration.jpg)
46.0 KB83 views
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-12-2017, 01:58 PM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
They released a firmware fix on the weekend and it worked and fixed a ton of stuff and now the camera can actually be used, not very practically, but it works. They redid the menus completely, but no way to format memory card and I'm yet to have my cards show up in camera so its still storing to built in memory. timelapse capture is there and works. getting focus with the wide angle lens (all i've had time to try) is pretty much impossible. Feedback from the camera is really non-existant, I can't tell when it takes the shot, if its still taking a shot or whatever. No exposure controls either so my evening tests on the weekend were way over exposed as it tried to make the sky bright and no indication it was going to take a long exposure . Yeah with no camera feedback it sits silently and you don't know if you can touch the camera or if that will ruin the shot. GPS orientation looks fixed but its object database is poor, Canopus doesnt exist in it it seems with any designation, I was looking at canopus on the screen but it had nothing identified anywhere nearby at all. But Carina was labelled off to the right so it should have something for the second brightest star.

Anyway at least the camera isnt dead and looks like it could take usable photos if they stop doing a half assed job on getting it to do what they promised. Dont bother ordering one if you were considering it until they sort their stuff out. Havent yet tried if their raw format loads into anything but it takes raw + jpg at least.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
astronomy, astrophotograhy, beginner

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement