Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-08-2021, 08:32 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,708
Jupiter with Mewlon 210 – single Frame vs 3,000 Frame Stack

Using the Mewlon 210 F11.5 with a Tak x1.6 Extender I managed to get a reasonable image of Jupiter on 14th August despite the less than optimal seeing conditions, as clouds kept rolling in throughout the session, disturbing the imaging acquisition. Theoretically this should have been taken at 3864mm at F 18.4.

I used the on-line calculator at:

http://www.wilmslowastro.com/software/formulae.htm

to calculate the actual focal length of my system with the x1.6 Extender , which turned out be 3687mm at F17.56, which gives me a multiplication factor of x6 i.e. 17.56 / 2.9. (FL / pixels size in microns)

Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Jupiter Single vs 3000 Frame Stack.jpg)
176.4 KB52 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-08-2021, 10:24 AM
Retrograde's Avatar
Retrograde (Pete)
a.k.a. @AstroscapePete

Retrograde is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,635
Looks good Dennis - some nice detail on Jupiter despite the conditions.

Interesting calculator - I had a look at the "CCD Planetary Critical Sampling" section and put in my own MN190 scope and ASI120 camera details and it says I should be imaging at a minimum focal length of 3689mm for blue light (red and green were less). I use a TV 4 x Powermate to give 4000mm so I guess that's a little over-sampled but not too bad.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-08-2021, 10:55 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,708
Thanks Pete, the seeing conditions sure make a huge difference.

I tried for the satellite event of the century earlier this morning after the clouds had gone, but the seeing was atrocious.

Cheers

Dennis

EDIT: It looks like I am oversampling too, at the measured 3687mm/F17.56 vs the "recommended" 2936mm/F14.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Jupiter Moon Event.jpg)
109.7 KB8 views
Click for full-size image (CCD Planetary Critical Sampling.jpg)
110.0 KB4 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-08-2021, 10:59 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis View Post
Thanks Pete, the seeing conditions sure make a huge difference.

I tried for the satellite event of the century earlier this morning after the clouds had gone, but the seeing was atrocious.

Cheers

Dennis
Nice catch Dennis. Superb snapshot. You did a lot better than I. Very sharp and clear.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-08-2021, 11:03 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Nice catch Dennis. Superb snapshot. You did a lot better than I. Very sharp and clear.
Hi Marc

Post #1 is from the 14th Aug when the seeing was slightly better, whereas the latest was from early this morning when the seeing was really quite poor.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-08-2021, 11:15 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,708
How does Autostakkert produce an image from this garbage input...

Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Autostakkert Screen.jpg)
103.0 KB9 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement