Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-07-2021, 05:19 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,665
Live Stacking of DSOs with SharpCap

I read a small article urging a new approach to DSO imaging using 30 second subs and ZWO cameras. It looks quite interesting in that it puts a much lower priority on guiding and precise PA. Might be a good technique for usenwhen travelling. Anyone given it a whirl yet?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-07-2021, 08:19 PM
Tinderboxsky's Avatar
Tinderboxsky (Steve)
I can see clearly now ...

Tinderboxsky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kingston TAS
Posts: 1,031
I have just started experimenting with the technique to see what is possible.

The attached are my early results for M20 and M22 based on the following:

Four second exposures stacked in SharpCap for total of ten minutes exposure. All processing done in SharpCap on the fly including dark frame subtraction, histogram management and some stretching and colour balancing. No post SharpCap processing.
ZWO ASI385 camera with Vixen ED103S doublet refractor (with focal reducer to give 530mm focal length) on an Ioptron MiniTower Pro ALT-AZ goto mount. So, no accurate polar alignment and no guiding. SharpCap takes care of field rotation for ALT_AZ mounts within the stacking process.

These images are my first attempts. I can see there is plenty of room to improve on these within SharpCap. I am potentially more interested in using this technique for EAA (electronically assisted astronomy) observing rather than using this technique to produce images that are then further enhanced with extensive post processing.

It is definitely worth a go and yes, relatively simple travel rigs can give excellent results.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Stack_163frames_655s_WithDisplayStretch.jpg)
122.4 KB148 views
Click for full-size image (Stack_178frames_715s_WithDisplayStretch.jpg)
150.5 KB111 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-07-2021, 09:27 PM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,056
Yes there’s huge potential for this short exposure live stacking. I think it lends itself well to alt-az mounts, and high sensitivity cameras but really will work for almost any setup. Don’t expect to get the same results as some of the top quality shots in this forum- but certainly good enough to be proud of and share with family and friends.

I found about 10-30sec subs are best with 20-30min integration- and with a UHC or dual band filter can get good definition on most targets even from the suburbs. When I shift to the next target I fiddle with the levels in PSexpress on my iPad and get a pretty decent result.

I use the ASIAIR pro live stacking but sharp cap will work the same with auto correction for field rotation and some degree of adjusting of contrast and white balance. The histogram slider can be used on the fly to focus on different areas of the target.

If using for strictly EAA then you can play with even more options. I’ve double and triple stacked reducers on my sct to get faster images, used different combinations of filters and sub lengths. It’s lots of fun when you’re not worrying too much about the star shapes!

One recommendation is that you want to be about f4-f7 on your scope to get the most out of 10sec!!

I’ve attached a couple of shots (Southern Pinwheel & Tarantula) with my cpc800 & asi294mc stacking 10sec subs for 30min integration. F4 with double stacked 0.63x reducers. No filters in these ones...but spent a few minutes to give a boost with PSexpress.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (202E7B26-8C80-4A25-9141-BAA082A5E47D.jpg)
92.5 KB114 views
Click for full-size image (97E5830A-EFFE-4D0F-BBD3-E7F73C76A1C8.jpg)
227.9 KB121 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-07-2021, 11:23 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,665
Well done, David. Those are very encouraging results.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-07-2021, 10:08 AM
Hemi
Registered User

Hemi is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Darwin
Posts: 608
Hey Peter,

I’ve been doing EAA for a few years now, and it’s a really interesting way to observe. There is a dedicated sub forum on Cloudy. There’s are also virtual star parties where you can join in and observe other people’s streams live or be an active participant. The videos are also available offline, and you can learn a lot about using sharpcap and other setups.

I mainly use a c11 at f10,6.3 or F2. My subs are usually between 4s-15s. And it’s very rare that total integration time would be more than 5m for me.
I’m currently in AZ, but prefer EQ for EAA. I mainly observe visually (especially in the dry season) hence the azeq6 is in AZ mode.

Some people do it for the aesthetic, others to observe. I’m in the latter, and it’s amazing what can be seen and learned.

I’ll edit this thread a bit later and add some pics from last nights session although I have posted some images in the beginners imaging section in the past…all of them EAA.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-07-2021, 10:15 AM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,056
Thanks Peter- as I said, you’re not going to get the cleanest results from this kind of imaging with such short integration times, but when it comes to bang for your buck it’s not bad at all! I’ve been playing with GEM mounts and a couple different OTA combinations lately and there is no doubt you can get much more out of longer subs and integration times so it just depends on what you want to do.

If you let me know your setup I’m happy to give you a few tips you could try
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-07-2021, 11:23 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave882 View Post
Thanks Peter- as I said, you’re not going to get the cleanest results from this kind of imaging with such short integration times, but when it comes to bang for your buck it’s not bad at all! I’ve been playing with GEM mounts and a couple different OTA combinations lately and there is no doubt you can get much more out of longer subs and integration times so it just depends on what you want to do.

If you let me know your setup I’m happy to give you a few tips you could try
Thanks David.
I oscillate between mounts, scopes and cameras to suit time of year etc. I generally keep my EQ6 and RC8 with a SBIG STF8300M intact for NB imaging nebula and for the rest, mess about with my HEQ5 with either a 127mm f7.5 refractor at 952fl or an 80mm f6 at 600 fl refractor. I image using an older SXVR H16 CCD. I’m in an urban location so imaging in LRGB has been problematic but I’m going to try some OSC to see what is possible with my ZWO ASI 290MC. That’s what made me take a second look at SharpCap and live stacking.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-07-2021, 12:25 PM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,056
Hi Peter. Asi290 has good QE but the issue you will face will be FOV. If you jump on to astronomy.tools you will notice that the targets you can image will be limited. However- there’s still plenty you can do, and with either the 80mm or 127mm refractors , but would strongly suggest adding a reducer in the order of 0.5-0.7x. You will want to be sitting at f4ish with that size scope for short exposures and will also increase fov. It will kill your star field but the target probably will still be ok.

Also, with smaller aperture scopes You might struggle to get much data (even for eaa) with under 20sec. I found with a 4se I was playing with I needed to get 30sec subs to show good detail even in something bright like Orion Nebula (irrespective of integration time). Since you are on (I presume) the heq5 if you do an ok PA you shouldn’t have a problem. Just a note on using EQ mounts for EAA- you still need to do a half decent PA otherwise the tracking is actively working against you unless you limit to 5sec or under subs. Most Alt-Az mounts I’ve used handle up to 10-30sec subs fine.

Try a broadband LPF such as Astronomik UHC-e or similar. A narrow band filter such as l-extreme will be far to aggressive for your setup.

Hope some of that is helpful
Cheers
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-07-2021, 12:06 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,665
Hi again David.
I managed a bit of semi clear sky last night and ran up the F7.5 80mm refractor with the ASI290MC just for fun.

It is apparent that, as you seemed to say, aperture rules here. I did a 10minute stack of 30second subs in RAW16 mode and … well it was disappointing really. I was imaging M16 - a good strong Ha source. I registered only a faint green luminosity with very little contrast or definition. OK. seeing wasn’t great but …

Also an issue, I could not stack subs of unequal length in DSS or access the SharpCap stacks in Photoshop - format not recognised.

Not the best start.

Last edited by pmrid; 16-07-2021 at 12:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-07-2021, 01:04 PM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,056
Sounds like could be a mix of issues. Here’s a few things to try:
- Green luminosity could be a white balance issue. You can adjust this in sharp cap during the livestacking without altering the saved subs. It could also be a function of light pollution or a filter if you are using one
- Try a couple different broadband filters (or no filter) and see if any difference
- 600mm fl on a 80mm aperture is f7.5. This is could be too slow for this 80mm setup if you want to get feint detail. Get a cheap 1.25” 0.5x-0.7x reducer and you will see a huge difference in 30sec subs.
- I’m convinced you will be able to get some eaa results, but don’t expect subs that will be worth your time to do quality post processing. Use your main setup for this.

I’m not sure about the dss issue as I haven’t got experience here. I usually do a screenshot or download the stacked version direct from ASIAIR which gives me a format I can play with. Maybe someone else knows about this...

Let us know how you go!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-07-2021, 07:44 PM
Tinderboxsky's Avatar
Tinderboxsky (Steve)
I can see clearly now ...

Tinderboxsky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kingston TAS
Posts: 1,031
Hi Peter,

SharpCap has a range of video format and still format outputs. Hopefully there is one available that Photoshop can read. You can find these output options at File>SharpCap Settings>General
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 18-07-2021, 09:34 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,425
Peter, I “play” with live stacking in SharpCap quite a bit these days and enjoy it it’s less stressful than “proper” imaging, and the results aren’t quite the same, but it’s good fun.

One thing to try is to click the Histogram tab and click the lightening bolt to balance the colours out. OSC cameras are inherently green biased, not only because of 2 green pixels out of a cluster of every 4, but because peak QE of most cameras occurs in the green region.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-07-2021, 11:04 AM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
Hi again David.
I managed a bit of semi clear sky last night and ran up the F7.5 80mm refractor with the ASI290MC just for fun.

It is apparent that, as you seemed to say, aperture rules here. I did a 10minute stack of 30second subs in RAW16 mode and … well it was disappointing really. I was imaging M16 - a good strong Ha source. I registered only a faint green luminosity with very little contrast or definition. OK. seeing wasn’t great but …
Hi Peter
My curiosity got the better of me last night and I thought I’d see what I could come up with while I was waiting for some other targets to get above the trees... trying to match your system as best I could on m16.
So with an older skywatcher ed80 @f7.5 and my asi290mm mini guide cam I did some 30sec subs unguided for about 13min (piggybacked on my sct so a bit overloaded on the cgem). Was able to get some pretty decent contrast (all be it in b/w) even though I was literally shooting directly into the almost full moon! No filters or any stretching, just the screenshot before post processing.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (C394240C-C274-496E-8CB9-A9A20C942323.jpg)
176.2 KB81 views
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 23-07-2021, 07:22 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,665
Hi Dave. Thanks for going to the trouble to run this test. Makes me wonder what could be achieved by a little post-processing magic.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23-07-2021, 07:56 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,425
If you can forgive my dodgy coma correction, this bright target was shot about a month ago on a dark night with 15 second exposures on my QHY 183C and 8" newt.

IMO the data can be better than the quick live stack, where the stacking is time pressured using a limited number of stars. Processing with dedicated software after the event can make it pop a bit more.

Fwiw, I think I was between targets at the time, so let it rock and roll for about an hour... but with bright targets like this, they certainly don't need that level of exposure time to be pleasing. Usually 5-10 minutes can give a really interesting result.

Note: this has been hideously downsampled to fit in the file upload limit. PM me for a full resolution version if you're interested.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Dunk-M20-live.jpg)
199.2 KB67 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23-07-2021, 09:01 AM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,056
Dunk that’s a fantastic result whether between targets or not and well processed too!
I agree with the timing too. If I’m home I’ve been doing 20-60min live stacks in the evening and then switch to an autorun function to do a few hours on a particular target while I go to bed. Best of both worlds I guess...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 23-07-2021, 10:09 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,425
Thanks David

Target was pretty much overhead at the time, but from sprawling suburbia. I was surprised at how well it came out

The 20MP camera is/was overkill for this, but it was what I had hooked up at the time

I think there's lots of fun to be had from this... regardless of scope/camera... (although fast scope helps of course)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 24-07-2021, 02:50 PM
RichardJ (Richard)
Psalm 19: 1 - 4

RichardJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Carlingford
Posts: 1,137
Hi Guys,

I've been using Livestack with SharpCap Pro for nearly all the deep sky objects I image from Home (suburban Sydney) for a few years now. I have a 12-inch Dob on a Blandin equatorial platform.

I don't need to bother with EQ mounts, PHD, guidescopes etc etc. I can be setup from scratch and imaging within 20 minutes. I love seeing the image 'develop' in front of my eyes.

Sure, its not perfect but it has allowed me to take my astroimaging to a new level of detail and enjoyment I only dreamnt about.

RichardJ
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (B33_2.jpg)
196.3 KB82 views
Click for full-size image (CENT-A-1.jpg)
195.1 KB83 views
Click for full-size image (M16.jpg)
195.9 KB79 views
Click for full-size image (NGC-3132-EBN-SRN-C74.jpg)
182.7 KB109 views
Click for full-size image (NGC-4038_4039-1.jpg)
199.2 KB88 views
Click for full-size image (M8.jpg)
195.6 KB68 views

Last edited by RichardJ; 25-07-2021 at 03:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 24-07-2021, 05:16 PM
Tinderboxsky's Avatar
Tinderboxsky (Steve)
I can see clearly now ...

Tinderboxsky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kingston TAS
Posts: 1,031
Fabulous results Richard.

I am just starting down the same path for observing faint objects after being a visual observer for a long time.

What sub lengths and exposure time have you been using. Interesting using an equatorial platform - is it driven or do you move manually.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 24-07-2021, 08:38 PM
RichardJ (Richard)
Psalm 19: 1 - 4

RichardJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Carlingford
Posts: 1,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinderboxsky View Post
Fabulous results Richard.

I am just starting down the same path for observing faint objects after being a visual observer for a long time.

What sub lengths and exposure time have you been using. Interesting using an equatorial platform - is it driven or do you move manually.
Hi Steve,

The platform is driven. I turn the gain way up and my sub times vary but I only need 0.5 to 2 seconds max. I know it is very short, but it works! I stack images until I think I have a good enough image to process. You need to play with the histogram and colour balance.
Good luck.

Richard.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement