Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Astrophotography and Imaging Equipment and Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-11-2021, 07:05 AM
ozskywatcher (Josie)
Registered User

ozskywatcher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 117
Recommendations for 'quick and dirty' imaging camera

Hi,

I have recently purchased a 6 inch F5 collapsible GOTO Skywatcher scope to take on a short road trip.

To compensate for the limited light gathering ability, I would like to buy an easy to use camera that I can take images with. Maybe a couple of seconds exposure and then I can see some sort of image on the screen. I don't want to image the planets.

So I would appreciate if anyone could recommend something that has easy to use software for a beginner and ideally costs no more than $500.

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2021, 08:30 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
You maybe surprised at what a modern smart phone and a telescope adaptor can produce.

Have a look here:

https://www.bintel.com.au/product/ce...phone-adapter/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2021, 08:44 AM
mura_gadi's Avatar
mura_gadi (Steve)
SpeakingB4Thinking

mura_gadi is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Canberra
Posts: 829
If you don't want to image the planets, you will need to change the settings on the phone camera to allow for longer exposure times.

Androids may only allow 3 and 10 sec exposures depend on the model. On iPhones I think you can hit "unlock" and get a lot more flexibility with shutter times and aperture sizes.

But you might find the phone clip is enough to get you some good results, if the objects are fairly bright.

Suggested settings for various objects using a phone camera will probably be posted somewhere...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:15 AM
ozskywatcher (Josie)
Registered User

ozskywatcher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 117
Something to try

I will definately give that a go.

I would still like suggestions for a low end imaging camera though. It is something I have been wanting to try for a while on my larger (12 inch) telescope. The road trip is just an excuse to buy some thing.

Thanks.


Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
You maybe surprised at what a modern smart phone and a telescope adaptor can produce.

Have a look here:

https://www.bintel.com.au/product/ce...phone-adapter/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:34 AM
redbeard's Avatar
redbeard (Damien)
Registered User

redbeard is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 558
A second hand DSLR Canon would be a great place to start as they are cheap, have a large sensor and there is a lot of software available. A google search will let you know if you need any spacers ect to achieve focus.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:50 AM
mura_gadi's Avatar
mura_gadi (Steve)
SpeakingB4Thinking

mura_gadi is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Canberra
Posts: 829
I'd second a DSLR camera, the DSLR gives you great camera and the ability to use it for AP as well.

The link below is a great way to compare cameras and explains a few of the features such as pixel pitch etc.


https://www.digicamdb.com/compare/ni...-canon_eos-7d/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:52 AM
sharkbite
Look up!

sharkbite is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: All around, Sometimes up, sometimes...
Posts: 323
Hi Josie...

I have a zwo224mc that is certainly quick - not dirty though!

I'm quite happy with the ease of use, and the ASILIVE capture software is pretty good for beginners - you might find the live stacking capability useful.

It even works on my crappy lappy.

Ease of use is a subjective thing - for me its as simple as jamming the camera in the scope, stuffing the usb cable in the PC and starting up ASILIVE....

Not to denigrate the suggestions of DLSR - they are great, and produce excellent results.
Also a cheap option if you already have one....

the big advantage i found with the zwo cameras is the light sensitivity in comparison to a DLSR - you can get a result with a much shorter exposure.

Also the weight - you dont have 1-2 kilos dragging down on the Dob motors...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-11-2021, 11:18 AM
mura_gadi's Avatar
mura_gadi (Steve)
SpeakingB4Thinking

mura_gadi is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Canberra
Posts: 829
Hello,

The new mirrorless camera are very light weight compared to the older style. I think you can get a A7s full frame sensor that weighs in around 640grams.

That's not much more than a 6-7 element eyepiece. You can also try renting one, about $20-$40 a day depending on what your getting. A cheap way of trying a camera's for a weekend. Esp. considering the potential costs...


Steve
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-11-2021, 01:00 PM
floyd_2's Avatar
floyd_2 (Dean)
Registered User

floyd_2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cecil Hills (Sydney)
Posts: 545
I use a Sony A6000 as an astro camera, really for EAA - so my requirements are similar to yours in terms of exposure length and what I want it to do for me. The results for what really is a camera that was never designed to be an astro camera are great.

Having noted that, you need a little bit of gear to connect it to a telescope and make it work properly (T2 adaptor for the camera, T2 adaptor for the scope, spacers to get the right back focus, filter drawer if you want one, coma corrector in your case if necessary).

If you're thinking of using a DSLR, you might want to check that your chosen software supports that camera. Alternatively you might want to check for the availability of an ASCOM driver for the camera. You may potentially need a solution for remotely updating the manual camera settings and releasing the shutter etc if an ASCOM driver won't do it for you.

For the A6000 there's a decent driver solution, but I'm not sure that it would be the best DSLR for the job. For me it was a great start though, and immediately opened up more targets to view that I could never spot easily from my backyard. I now observe inside, with everything remotely operated outside - much more comfortable
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-11-2021, 01:40 PM
mura_gadi's Avatar
mura_gadi (Steve)
SpeakingB4Thinking

mura_gadi is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Canberra
Posts: 829
Warning this is a Hi-Jack,

Dean,

I have been looking at 2nd hand dslr's, as the better half likes the idea of a good camera as well.

Can I ask what's involved in your setup and if its not rude a rough price as well.

*We have a 4k TV and I was wondering about transmitting a 4k signal instead of the 1080p format.



Thanks
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-11-2021, 03:32 PM
ozskywatcher (Josie)
Registered User

ozskywatcher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 117
Back to the origional question.. :-)

From following the contributions I can narrow my question a bit more.

Can anyone suggest a low cost lightweight (not a DSLR - Have two of those) astrocamera with live stacking software so I can do a quick exposure and see the image on my laptop.

I basically want to spend less than $500. I might not want to pursue this side of astronomy. And weight is important. I will be experimenting with it on a lightweight 6 inch GOTO Dobsonian mount before I used it on my 12 inch not so lightweight GOTO Dobsonian.

Thanks,

Josie.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-11-2021, 07:47 PM
sharkbite
Look up!

sharkbite is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: All around, Sometimes up, sometimes...
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozskywatcher View Post
From following the contributions I can narrow my question a bit more.

Can anyone suggest a low cost lightweight (not a DSLR - Have two of those) astrocamera with live stacking software so I can do a quick exposure and see the image on my laptop.

I basically want to spend less than $500. I might not want to pursue this side of astronomy. And weight is important. I will be experimenting with it on a lightweight 6 inch GOTO Dobsonian mount before I used it on my 12 inch not so lightweight GOTO Dobsonian.

Thanks,

Josie.
....

Why, yes I can ;-)

The 224 will set you back about $350.

It does planetary really well,
And I have pleasing results with deep sky as well.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-11-2021, 08:06 PM
ozskywatcher (Josie)
Registered User

ozskywatcher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 117
ZWO ASI224MC USB3.0 Colour Astronomy Camera?

OK, I will give it a go!

Just been looking on the Bintel website.

This one? ZWO ASI224MC USB3.0 Colour Astronomy Camera.

Thanks by the way for the recommendation.

Regards,

Josie.



Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkbite View Post
....

Why, yes I can ;-)

The 224 will set you back about $350.

It does planetary really well,
And I have pleasing results with deep sky as well.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-11-2021, 10:07 PM
floyd_2's Avatar
floyd_2 (Dean)
Registered User

floyd_2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cecil Hills (Sydney)
Posts: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by mura_gadi View Post
Warning this is a Hi-Jack,

Dean,

I have been looking at 2nd hand dslr's, as the better half likes the idea of a good camera as well.

Can I ask what's involved in your setup and if its not rude a rough price as well.

*We have a 4k TV and I was wondering about transmitting a 4k signal instead of the 1080p format.
There was a bit involved for me to get to the point of EAA with my DSLR. I had a Sony A6000 not doing a whole lot, so started wondering how it would go as an Astro camera. The main things for me to get were a bahtinov mask, ZWO 2” filter drawer, spacers, a field flattener / reducer for my C9.25, some cables and the adaptors to go on each end to hook it all up with the right back focus. Other than that, it was mostly about software and drivers. I ended up using Stellarium, the Sony Remote suite, an Ascom driver that was written for the Alpha cameras and Sharpcap Pro. The bits and pieces required to hook it all up cost about $500 excluding the camera which I already had.

I ended up documenting the set up as I went in case I ever had to go through it again. With regard to 4K, I’m not sure that you would get the best results connecting a camera’s HDMI out directly to a 4K tv as it wouldn’t allow you to layer timed exposures. You would only ever be able to look at a single frame. At least with the Sony the chip is 6000x4000 which I believe exceeds 4K so there might be possibilities for using a 4K capable laptop running Sharpcap to drive it all.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-11-2021, 10:10 PM
floyd_2's Avatar
floyd_2 (Dean)
Registered User

floyd_2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cecil Hills (Sydney)
Posts: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozskywatcher View Post
OK, I will give it a go!

Just been looking on the Bintel website.

This one? ZWO ASI224MC USB3.0 Colour Astronomy Camera.

Thanks by the way for the recommendation.

Regards,

Josie.
It might be worth using the Bintel Astronomy Calculator to see how the 224MC would go with your telescope just to be sure that it’s a decent match.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-11-2021, 06:50 AM
ozskywatcher (Josie)
Registered User

ozskywatcher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 117
Bintel Astronomy Calculator

Thanks for the suggestion.

I have had a look this morning. I couldn't find my exact telescope so I chose a couple with the same F ratio.

I haven't used the calculator before. Is the point of it to see if it will cover the type of objects I want to image?

Thanks,

Josie.


Quote:
Originally Posted by floyd_2 View Post
It might be worth using the Bintel Astronomy Calculator to see how the 224MC would go with your telescope just to be sure that it’s a decent match.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-11-2021, 07:43 AM
floyd_2's Avatar
floyd_2 (Dean)
Registered User

floyd_2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cecil Hills (Sydney)
Posts: 545
You can enter your telescope’s focal length and ratio manually rather than selecting a telescope from the list with that tool. You can override the camera settings the same way if you’re considering a camera that isn’t on the list. I’ve used the tool to check resolution per pixel for a given combo, check for over sampling / under sampling, and also to check the FOV of the combo.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-11-2021, 08:14 PM
ozskywatcher (Josie)
Registered User

ozskywatcher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 117
Thanks

Thanks Dean.

I will give it a go.



Quote:
Originally Posted by floyd_2 View Post
You can enter your telescope’s focal length and ratio manually rather than selecting a telescope from the list with that tool. You can override the camera settings the same way if you’re considering a camera that isn’t on the list. I’ve used the tool to check resolution per pixel for a given combo, check for over sampling / under sampling, and also to check the FOV of the combo.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement