Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 10-11-2011, 09:16 AM
Krumlov (Gavin)
Registered User

Krumlov is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer View Post
a variable polariser is probably your best choice.
OK thanks. My next question is are all polarisers created equal. I have seen Andrews has name brand for $15 and Celestron for $69. Bintel have their name brand for $19. AOE have a set for $25. Astroshop have a Lumicon variable for $69. That is a quick selection. So are the $15 ones as good as the $70?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-11-2011, 12:01 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krumlov View Post
OK thanks. My next question is are all polarisers created equal. I have seen Andrews has name brand for $15 and Celestron for $69. Bintel have their name brand for $19. AOE have a set for $25. Astroshop have a Lumicon variable for $69. That is a quick selection. So are the $15 ones as good as the $70?
Hi,

Andrews sell the GSO ones but you need 2 of them and then you screw them together so they cost you $30, not $15. I am guessing the same applies to the BINTEL ones. The Lumicon one for $65 is the two filters already combined. I haven't used any of them so can't comment first hand. I have an Orion one which I don't think anyone sells in Australia any more. Optically it works very well.

As a generalisation you usually get what you pay for. ie The $80,000 Lexus and the $15,000 KIA both get you to the shopping centre ok. The Lexus will last somewhat longer and do it all a little nicer. Whilst the Lumicon filters are now made in the far east, they have been one of the benchmarks for astronomical filters for several decades and I would think their quality control will be somewhat tighter than on the cheaper filters. I am guessing the Lumicon would control stray reflections a little better than the cheaper ones and have better machining tolerances on the filter threads. Some of the cheap filters don't screw onto all eyepieces very well.

Cheers,
John B
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement