Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Poll: Is the world really stuffed
Poll Options
Is the world really stuffed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 01-06-2005, 11:30 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I think the "let's move to mars" is more of a joke, but I do believe what we've done to the Earth is shocking and I don't know how we can recover.

The Earth took 5 billion years to get to this point. Man has been here (in its current resource-hungry capacity) for a few hundred years, and look what we've done. Imagine the next 200-300 years!? It's quite inconceivable for me to imagine what we're leaving for the next generations. Until we start pushing for the use of reusable energy (the sun, wind etc) then we're just pushing ourselves further towards self-destruction.

It's quite sad really, what man has done. Destroy wildlife, nature, other species. I'm sure in a way it's just natural evolution - the top of the food chain looks after himself.

But only 20,000 years ago we were not much more than apes. What form is evolution going to take us in the next 1,000 years, if we've still got an Earth to call home?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-06-2005, 11:38 PM
fringe_dweller's Avatar
fringe_dweller
on the highway to Hell

fringe_dweller is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,623
Personally I blame all the cows and sheep in NZ for the greenhouse effect - heheh only joking! saw that movie recently - the 'day after tomorrow' or something or rather (yes i am the last person in the universe to see it i know) i dont like the look of those supercells tooo much!
Fringey
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-06-2005, 11:48 PM
fringe_dweller's Avatar
fringe_dweller
on the highway to Hell

fringe_dweller is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,623
But it must be said the earth has been poisonous to life more often than not! nature is pretty good at trashing planets as well! One big series of eruptions or one super volcano can spew more crap into the atmosphere than we ever have so far! Its like in the movie 28 days - earth would just returning to normal!
Fringey
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-06-2005, 12:34 AM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Check this environmental tragedy ...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...fic/678898.stm

http://enrin.grida.no/aral/aralsea/e...rsea/arsea.htm
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-06-2005, 03:22 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Just terrible Stuart.. Didn't Saddam Hussein do a similar thing in the swamp lands of Iraq? The "rebels" used them as hideouts, so Saddam poisened the whole area and killed off everything, so now it's just desert.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-06-2005, 05:55 PM
trufflehunter's Avatar
trufflehunter (Wayne Robinson)
Purveyor of fine truffles

trufflehunter is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Lambton, Newcastle
Posts: 212
The Aral Sea is a tragedy on two levels. Firstly it's a tragedy due its very existence. Secondly it's a tragedy because so few people are aware of it.

...thirdly, it's a tragedy because of the complete and exasperating complacency it engenders.

I have to stop here. Sorry. Please don't get me started.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-06-2005, 07:08 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,425
Since we are so doomed we should sell everything we have , buy the buggest (NZ for biggest) telescope we can and move to the mountains, and live out the rest of our existance doing the thing we really like

mind you I don't know how much I will get for the wife and kids
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-06-2005, 10:20 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
I have enjoyed reading these posts from my well lit, electrically heated house as I wear my baby sealskin slippers, drink my GMO sweetened soft drink and smoke my thirld world grown/harvested and wrapped by exploited labour cigar...while my wife drives one of our luxary 4 wheel drives .5 km to get a McD take away meal for my obese children...remind me to have one of my exploited household domestic staff water my yard before I have them deported before I have to pay them (below award level wage of course)...

What fun...

Seriously though, in grad school I did a fair amount of work on climate change and the impact on agricultural production...there is a lot of conflicting data on the topic in particular as to whether or not things are getting warmer and if so is it a bad thing...I won't be drawn into an arguement on that subject...most of the models I've seen showed a warming and a shifting in arable areas...some people who used to be wet get dry and some people who are dry/cold get wet and warm...total food production didn't seem to change much but fruit trees become very popular in Canada!...

My 2 cents...climate change is pretty constant through the history of the planet...again there is lots of arguement on if the speed of change is growing...is it man made or natural???

I will say that I don't think the "Malthusian's" are correct we are not doomed...and no, I will not eat soylent green (it is made from people)...so in my opinion the sky is not falling yet...

I don't know how or why but, I think that human kind will find a way to survive...our monkey brains have shown that we are a resilient and inventive (destructive to) lot and I think whether through serendipity or hard work that things will work out okay in the end...call me pollyanna but, that is what I beleive...

Sounds like my wife is back with my Supersize meal...better go, I've got to eat some beef and throw away some paper packaging

Last edited by wavelandscott; 02-06-2005 at 10:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-06-2005, 10:34 PM
gaa_ian's Avatar
gaa_ian (Ian)
1300 THESKY

gaa_ian is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
Well I voted for ...It will get better ...why ?
Over the last 20 yrs I've have seen a big shift in awareness.
I was personally involved in the Franklin & Wet tropics campaigns.
Both great victories & turning points in public awareness.
I now work for a large multinational corporation (unthinkable to me 20trs ago !) I see attitudes changing in the corporate world too.
Environment Health & Safety is a core value for the company I work for (a company with 80,000 employees worldwide)
Yes, many things are still wrong, but we have come a long way since the 80's
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-06-2005, 11:11 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
The main (environmental) problem is that we use a lot of energy to sustain our way of life (and to keep producing more people who will do likewise). We need to become conscious of the impact of our way of life on the rest of our world, e.g., turning on the heater out of habit; driving big heavy vehicles; using the dryer instead of the clothesline; and so on. I'm guilty...

It looks like I might have a decent income soon, so I'm going to switch to Green Power (even though it's gonna remain a bit of a joke until some investors with a lot of $$ decide to take it seriously).

Last edited by janoskiss; 02-06-2005 at 11:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 02-06-2005, 11:13 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Do you realise Henry Ford is the biggest contributor to the mess we live in now.

He invented the production line and helped do away with the village cobbler, village blacksmith, village baker etc, etc.

I think the 'Amish' have it right! I would like to live that way.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-06-2005, 09:49 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Consumerism will be the end of Earth

David Suzuki said it in a nutshell. Consumerism will be the end of us all. Hardly anyone in the developed world wants to go back to the bad old days of " Doing it Yourself "
We want it all, and we want it now.
We hop in the car to drive 1/4 a km up to the shops when a brisk walk would be best for our health. We wear clothes made from synthetic fibres when we all know that cotton/wool is better as well as renewable . We eat food that is so processed that it needs added vitamins and minerals to make it nutritious. We can't be bothered to clean dirty nappies, so we make the poor kid wear a plastic one, that won't break down biologically, till that little kids great great grand kids are born. We use solvents and cleansers instead of good old elbow grease.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I've not ever done the same things. The convenience of all the products on the supermarket shelf is a boon to everyone. But is the ecological cost of it worth this convenience?
It is my belief that consumerism won't slow down, it will come to a grinding halt the day we use up all the earths resources.
It is our responsibility to teach our children/grand kids, how to do it for themselves. Little things like learning to sew, cook and grow veges, even how grow and kill your own meat, basic building skills etc etc because the day will come when it will be those that have these basic skills that will survive.
As was said before in this thread, The Amish have the right idea, when the sh*t hits the fan, it won't make any difference to them.
A couple of good books to read on the subject of the end of the world, are-:
" Stark " and " This Other Eden " both by Ben Elton. Wickedly funny, and highly relevant.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-06-2005, 10:16 AM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
gaa ian wrote
Quote:
Over the last 20 yrs I've have seen a big shift in awareness.
You're right there has been an increase in awareness but there hasn't been a corresponding increase in action. I would have thought that 20+ years down the track we would be starting to do something to address problems that could be contributing to climate change rather than just being aware and further studying the effects... I see more trees being chopped down, more pollution, more corruption, at least in my state, perhaps it's different in the rest of Australia...
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-06-2005, 11:02 AM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
I hope the Amish let you keep your dob BD, but upgrading to goto would be out of the question.
At least there's some honest people here that admit their responsible.
Blaming previous generations is a cop out.
Awareness is growing, especially in kids.We dont have a recycling bin in our rubbish collection yet but due to pressure from the kids awareness of the problems being created , they've 'demanded' we recycle the plastic,glass and cardboard etc here at home. That has to be a step in the right direction for their future if their concerned enough to take some action.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-06-2005, 02:09 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
comes down to individuals tho slice. most kids'll still throw thier trash on the ground. and Cheryl and I have problems convincing Bec that we should recycle too

It'll all work when the majority are interested. But humans are by nature lazy creatures
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-06-2005, 02:16 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
So true Ving,So true
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-06-2005, 02:20 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
i know... so wise for one so young
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-06-2005, 02:30 PM
Brendan's Avatar
Brendan
casual star gazer

Brendan is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley-Maitland
Posts: 264
this is a deeply phylisophical question, I would have to say unless we as a species change our behviour, we will go the way of the dinosaurs but leave the planet in a lot worse shape.

The truly scary thought is as resources become scarcer and population numbers swell, will we suffer the same fate as those animals who we consider lesser species i.e. Mice will attack each other if over croweded.

I think the ultimate solution is to combine strategies of planetary settelment and increase in resource reuse.

Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-06-2005, 02:35 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
there are probably a few people out there that would eat another of thier kind. I'd say we'd be safe from vegetarians tho
I think something will happen before we get to the stage of eating eachother brendan. we will either figure out food shortage problems or kill each other in war first...
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-06-2005, 02:45 PM
Mark Elkington
Registered User

Mark Elkington is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Blue Mountains
Posts: 15
Did somebody say "soapbox"? :-)


It’s Not Easy Being Green

It turns out the frog was right, although he wasn’t singing about the environment.

The war on plastic shopping bags is another rearrangement of the deck chairs. The bags issue at least impacts at a personal, everyday level. It even costs us a few dollars. But disposable shopping bags account for just over one percent of landfill. The reusable alternatives amount to a polypropylene rug under which to sweep a greater problem: the packaging of the items inside them. Relaxing in the green glow of these bags are consumers who are high-maintenance but think they’re low maintenance (to misappropriate a phrase).

Shrink-wrap over everything we buy is one thing. I recently joined with friends on a four-wheel drive weekend: kids, tents, bacon and eggs. And 100 litres of nonrenewable fossil fuel per vehicle, which we converted into about 300kg of greenhouse gas. I’m not picking on recreational vehicles particularly. Your return flight to Melbourne for the weekend used a similar amount of fuel per head. Every time you put on the air con rather than a jumper you become part of the problem. In your 30 square eveless heated towel-rail downlight-constellation ducted-air McMansion.

Take a drive (no, a bus) to the 2600 megawatt Bayswater Power Station, and boggle at the mountain of coal conveyor-fed direct from mine to furnace. Every time you flick a switch another kilogram of carbon goes up into the atmosphere.

There’s a disconnect between our lifestyle and its consequences. Assume for the moment that they’re right: the 97% of scientists who say that global warming heading towards catastrophic climate change is real, and greenhouse gas emissions from burning coal, oil, and gas are the primary cause. Decades hence our children’s children, living with this, will incredulously ask their grandparents, What were you thinking…? The epithet "future eaters" would be apt.

Greenhouse gases (primarily carbon dioxide) are invisible and easy to ignore. Smog from burning fossil fuel is obvious, alarming, and political. It gets attention. Now it’s been discovered that this form of visible pollution blocks sunlight and causes “global dimming”, i.e. less warming. Ironically, by fixing only the symptom, we’re letting off a handbrake on warming. Since the 70s oil shock, fossil fuel consumption has increased globally by 73%. Global reserves of oil, coal and gas are estimated in decades. The environment will run out before they do.

Cheap petrol is a sacred staple along with bread and milk. Educating people to act responsibly and sacrificially largely doesn’t work. User pays does. Petrol in Europe is about AU$1.70 a litre. In the US it’s a bit over AU$0.70. It’s no surprise then that North Americans consume 5 times more energy per capita than the global average. Environmentally the United States is the leading rogue state. Australia isn't far behind at nearly 70% of their levels.

Bob Carr talks green but capitulates to coal and private transport. The Howard government won’t ratify Koyoto because it’s bad for business. Bush is Big Oil. (But who elected them.) China and India are now rapidly industrialising, with few of the eco-restraints it’s taken the West a couple of centuries to begin to face up to.

Professor James Lovelock, author of the Gaia hypothesis and environmental icon, is now advocating an interim widespread switch to nuclear power. He says this is the only way to prevent crossing an irreversible climatic “tipping point”. Alternative renewable energy sources just won’t be ready in time. He’s now at loggerheads which much of the green movement.

Doomsday prophets have a bad track record. But the past is not always the key to the future.

© 2005 Mark Elkington (Sydney, Australia)

From: http://www.users.on.net/~elkos/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement