Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 06-03-2018, 10:28 AM
Bart's Avatar
Bart
Don't have a cow, Man!

Bart is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,117
Oh..my eyes...my eyes...I can't see any more...

He he..Mike, looks great though, I like it!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-03-2018, 10:48 AM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post

Now, by odd, I assume you mean the small halos around some of the stars..? These halos are more prominent in NB and the heavy stretching I did plus the fact there is no RGB star data (which shows no halos) has made'em a bit more obvious
[/URL][/B]

Mike
Hang on, you mean that stretched NB stars are going to have halos, but RGB will not. How does that work?

And if that's the case, is it worth considering using a starmask to control the amount of stretch on the stars themselves?

Or maybe even just replace 'em all with RGB stars
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-03-2018, 11:24 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
That you achieved this in one bright and moonlit night is extraordinary.

Bravo.
Yeah I am like a human automated machine for imaging sessions these days...I work like clockwork, the Robert Evans of imaging automation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart View Post
Oh..my eyes...my eyes...I can't see any more...

He he..Mike, looks great though, I like it!
Ha ha, cool...sorry bout your eyes Bart

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01 View Post
Hang on, you mean that stretched NB stars are going to have halos, but RGB will not. How does that work?

And if that's the case, is it worth considering using a starmask to control the amount of stretch on the stars themselves?

Or maybe even just replace 'em all with RGB stars
I do use star masks usually, but in a nut shell, I probably should have taken much more data and not at full moon (particularly with the wider 12nm NB's), not guassian stretched the OIII (or any of the filters really ) so much, as it was thin data and with gradients I had to remove, especially the OIII ....having said that the halos don't particularly bother me and the overall impact of the piece was what I was after in this case...I should really revisit the area, with no or much less Moon and take more data....

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-03-2018, 01:05 PM
OzEclipse's Avatar
OzEclipse (Joe Cali)
Registered User

OzEclipse is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: '34 South' Young Hilltops LGA, Australia
Posts: 1,481
Magic Mike!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-03-2018, 01:14 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
It has some explosive impact Mike, just don’t look too closely
Given its limited data and moon lit capture... don’t look too hard
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-03-2018, 05:40 PM
Ryderscope's Avatar
Ryderscope (Rodney)
Registered User

Ryderscope is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glanmire, NSW
Posts: 2,351
Beautiful Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-03-2018, 10:00 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Super image Mike. Very striking.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-03-2018, 11:19 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzEclipse View Post
Magic Mike!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
It has some explosive impact Mike, just don’t look too closely
Given its limited data and moon lit capture... don’t look too hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryderscope View Post
Beautiful Mike.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059 View Post
Super image Mike. Very striking.
Cheers guys, glad it was visually appealing..even with the warts

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-03-2018, 11:36 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Nice work Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-03-2018, 11:45 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Nice work Mike.
Thanks Rob, after some feedback and looking at it on a few different monitors, I think I will increase the contrast a bit

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-03-2018, 03:39 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Definitely gives Jason Pollock a run for his money.
I notice a great similarity to the Honeycomb Nebula
in the Large Magellanic Cloud,close to Supernova 1987A.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Honeycomb Neb.jpg)
17.8 KB21 views

Last edited by astroron; 07-03-2018 at 04:44 PM. Reason: correction of date
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-03-2018, 04:04 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Another pic with a wider field including SN1987A
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ESO-SN1987A_HoneycombNebula #3.jpg)
198.3 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-03-2018, 04:16 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Definitely gives Jason Pollock a run for his money.
I notice a great similarity to the Honeycomb Nebula
in the Large Magellanic Cloud,close to Supernova 1978A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Another pic with a wider field including SN1987A
Ha! yeah that's excellent Ron, recon you may well be right. Be great if we lived for 1,000,000 years or so just to see how these things get on...might get a bit bored though? ...unless we perceived a year like we currently perceive an few minutes...

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-03-2018, 05:26 PM
willik (Willik)
Registered User

willik is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 717
Is it for sale
Martin -
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-03-2018, 07:52 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
I'll sell prints off the back of the truck for $1.2million - that's a $100K saving over an original
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-03-2018, 01:37 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by willik View Post
Is it for sale
Martin -
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
I'll sell prints off the back of the truck for $1.2million - that's a $100K saving over an original
Sorry guys...it's priceless besides I'm not selling it to Lewis for $1.2 Mill cus it'll be worth over $300 mill in 45 years....when I am 95
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-03-2018, 08:10 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,425
its kinda Andy Warholish?

no no its Ken Done!!!

either way its way out of my league, and it takes skills to make it look that... er ....artistic. Curiously whats it look like in vanilla?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-03-2018, 12:34 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
its kinda Andy Warholish?

no no its Ken Done!!!

either way its way out of my league, and it takes skills to make it look that... er ....artistic. Curiously whats it look like in vanilla?
Yes colour wise I guess ie vibrant and strong but style wise..?.. definitely a Pollock

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-03-2018, 08:59 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
At the risk of this dumb electrician being called an art snob,
Blue Poles is one of my favourite artworks.
I see something new every time I look at it.

Nice rendition Mike,

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-03-2018, 11:14 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinetic View Post
At the risk of this dumb electrician being called an art snob,
Blue Poles is one of my favourite artworks.
I see something new every time I look at it.

Nice rendition Mike,

Steve
Ha ha cheers Steve and I agree with you, it was, and remains, the subject of controversy and divided opinion...probably why it is now worth so much

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement