Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 12-06-2015, 01:33 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
4 hour of 3324 should be interesting!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 13-06-2015, 08:53 PM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
I did 4 hours and 24 minutes. 66 x 240 seconds ISO 800. I am not glad with the result, because I did a comparison with another photo of 2013 with only 40 minutes, and I see that my seeing here is very worse after this two years.
The large photo of 2013 can be seen at: http://www.astrobin.com/41885/
The atual large photo at http://www.astrobin.com/186662/

Despite of 4 hours the nebula was very faint. To enhance it I will need to do some hours with UHC filter.

To get what you can see I needed to strech very much the signal. Since the files are larger than 200 Kb I can not publish here. Please take a look at http://jsmastronomy.30143.n7.nabble....ula-td431.html, also.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16-06-2015, 07:50 AM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
Ok, it was done. Total of 7 hours and 16 minutes, with 27 x 480 sec ISO 800 UHC filter.
The files are very large because of amount of data in the image. Please take a look:
large scale: http://www.astrobin.com/187281/
normal : http://jsmastronomy.30143.n7.nabble....d431.html#a432
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 16-06-2015, 09:14 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Very nice Jorge. The UHC filter helped bring out much more Ha nebula. What type of UHC filter was it?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 16-06-2015, 09:35 PM
chuckywiz (Ben)
Registered User

chuckywiz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: East Cannington
Posts: 184
Hi Jorge,

Love the photo, ive tried this target and is not even in the same ballpark. as im still very very early learning on processing, any chance you could post a pic of what 1 x 480 sec shot looks like with no processing. Id be interested to see how that look so i can see if im on the right track with longer exposures etc.

Ben
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 17-06-2015, 02:59 AM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
Kevin it is a Halfa + OIII filter from Teleskop germany shop

Quote:
could post a pic of what 1 x 480 sec shot looks like with no processing
It is difficult with no processing, because it will debayered. If I do a copy screen from ZoomBrowser-Canon and a conversion to JPG by Photoshop-CamaraRAW with all sliders in zero, the photos will be different because of different algorithm to debayering.

I am posting conversion JPG from Photoshop. Wide view and a crop with full resolution of camera.
As the 480 seconds was with UHC filter I am posting the 240 seconds skyglow filter also.

Skyglow, UHC and Crop
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (skyglow.jpg)
76.4 KB10 views
Click for full-size image (Uhc.jpg)
91.0 KB11 views
Click for full-size image (cropImage.jpg)
151.1 KB9 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement