Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
You would see the exact same colours that you see in your telescope
|
Yes, that's because (any) telescopic views preserve the underlying surface brightness, (assuming you get an optical magnification). As Rick pointed out, travelling closer to a nebula also preserves surface brightness, so a telescope sort of simulates the real nebula view from closer.
In fact, I think closer naked eye views ought to be brighter and more colourful than telescopic views. That's because telescopic optics lose some light, things are brighter above the atmosphere, but most importantly, the interstellar medium extincts magnitudes by around 1.8 VMag per kpc near us (according to Wikipedia !)
I've read that our eyes need about VMag 16/arcsec^2 to start perceiving colour. The core of M42 is about 14.5/arcsec^2. Things are a bit more difficult to calculate for say the Eta Carinae Nebula, or even the Tarantula Nebula, since although their surface brightness is down at about 16-17/arcsec^2, there's a bigger amount of amount interstellar extinction to add back if we could get closer (compared to M42). Some planetary nebula may even show some colours, the Bug Nebula has pretty high surface brightness at its core. Ring Nebula is also quite bright.
All in all, yes, I still think we would see colours closer to the intrinsically brightest nebula, but it's probably more like green to grey wispy tendrils than the full on multi-colour sci-fi nebula clouds.