Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 17-01-2015, 04:51 AM
Renato1 (Renato)
Registered User

Renato1 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Frankston South
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by mental4astro View Post
Here's something I've been pondering for some time (meaning of life can wait a bit longer... ). Long exposure photos, and even with just highly sensitive CCD's we can see colour in nebulae. Even with a big dob we can see pink and blue coming of M42. But, if we were much closer to a bright nebula like M42, would our eyes be able to detect any colour coming off it? Just our naked, unassisted eyes. Colour or not?

Mental.
You would see the exact same colours that you see in your telescope.

Nearly all TV shows and movies showing space ships going past very colourful nebula are incorrect. The only exception I remember was the TV series Lost In Space, which used black and white photos of nebula and galaxies as space background in the show.
Regards,
Renato
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 18-01-2015, 08:20 PM
SamD's Avatar
SamD (Sam)
Registered User

SamD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Brisbane SW
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1 View Post
You would see the exact same colours that you see in your telescope
Yes, that's because (any) telescopic views preserve the underlying surface brightness, (assuming you get an optical magnification). As Rick pointed out, travelling closer to a nebula also preserves surface brightness, so a telescope sort of simulates the real nebula view from closer.

In fact, I think closer naked eye views ought to be brighter and more colourful than telescopic views. That's because telescopic optics lose some light, things are brighter above the atmosphere, but most importantly, the interstellar medium extincts magnitudes by around 1.8 VMag per kpc near us (according to Wikipedia !)

I've read that our eyes need about VMag 16/arcsec^2 to start perceiving colour. The core of M42 is about 14.5/arcsec^2. Things are a bit more difficult to calculate for say the Eta Carinae Nebula, or even the Tarantula Nebula, since although their surface brightness is down at about 16-17/arcsec^2, there's a bigger amount of amount interstellar extinction to add back if we could get closer (compared to M42). Some planetary nebula may even show some colours, the Bug Nebula has pretty high surface brightness at its core. Ring Nebula is also quite bright.

All in all, yes, I still think we would see colours closer to the intrinsically brightest nebula, but it's probably more like green to grey wispy tendrils than the full on multi-colour sci-fi nebula clouds.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 31-01-2015, 04:29 AM
cathalferris
Registered User

cathalferris is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Limerick, Ireland
Posts: 13
The nebula are just (in general) not bright enough to activate the cone structures in our retinas. If you were closer to the nebula, it would be larger and easier to see, but still not bright enough to show colour. It would have the same surface brightness as when looking through a scope with the same exit pupil as your dark adapted eye pupil size.

If it showed colour in the eyepiece, it may show colour when physically closer. Our eyes are certainly sensitive to the nebula emission, it's just not bright enough to show colours. Exceptions are certainly possible, with the green hue of the “Huygenian Region" and tinges of H-Alpha in the wings both in M42.

In general, if you do not see colour in the eyepiece, you will not see colour when physically closer.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement