Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 12-01-2015, 12:21 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
That is a very faint object. What sub length are you using on it?
20 minutes. Probably would have done better with 30.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hector View Post
Thanks, That is the best image I have seen of my Planetary so far. I hope you don't mind me using it as my screen saver for a while.
No problem at all Andrew. Glad you like the image.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2015, 12:33 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35 View Post
20 minutes. Probably would have done better with 30.



.
Actually I was thinking maybe 40 or 50 minutes might be more helpful. Fred does 40 minutes a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2015, 01:59 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Nice, ghostly faint bugger that.

Mike

Each to their own.
Personally, I find something original (like Steve has done) to be more interesting than the five thousand and ninety third regurgitation of M42, horsehead, etc.

Last edited by clive milne; 12-01-2015 at 02:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:54 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Faint !! Very well done.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:32 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Very impressive Steve. Nice to see some difficult objects rather than the run of the mill stuff.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-01-2015, 09:55 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by clive milne View Post
Each to their own.
Personally, I find something original (like Steve has done) to be more interesting than the five thousand and ninety third regurgitation of M42, horsehead, etc.
Errr? "each to there own"?? Wha? Ooo-k, you do know Clive, that this is a thread Steve started back in Feb last year recently resurrected and my response was made just a few days after that..?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-01-2015, 10:39 PM
Regulus's Avatar
Regulus (Trevor)
Regulus - Couer de Leon

Regulus is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Devonport, Tasmania
Posts: 2,350
That looks like a tough target to photograph AND to process. Wow, well done.
Be great to see how it came out after another 320 minutes of exposure.

Trevor
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-01-2015, 11:08 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Errr? "each to there own"?? Wha? Ooo-k, you do know Clive, that this is a thread Steve started back in Feb last year recently resurrected and my response was made just a few days after that..?
I think I see the problem...
you said 'faint bugger that'

I read:
Faint, bugger that.

the placement of the comma completely changes the meaning, hence my response.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-01-2015, 11:57 PM
Nortilus (Josh)
Registered User

Nortilus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Mackay, QLD
Posts: 455
wow...thats a top job there...i really like all the galaxies around in the image too...
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 13-01-2015, 12:12 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by clive milne View Post
I think I see the problem...
you said 'faint bugger that'

I read:
Faint, bugger that.

the placement of the comma completely changes the meaning, hence my response.
Misinterpretation of posts is pretty easy huh?

Reminds me of that Faulty Towers scene in the dining room when Basil and Polly are trying to convince the spoon salesman how easy it is to confuse who is talking to who

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 13-01-2015, 10:07 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Thanks for the comments guys. I'm not sure why this one suddenly surfaced again though after almost 12 months. If the sky ever clears up again I'm going to try and get some more data so we'll see what happens.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 13-01-2015, 01:32 PM
hector (Andrew)
Registered User

hector is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Umina NSW Australia
Posts: 279
That would be me, I found the post with shots of my planetary and wanted to say thanks. For those that are interested we have seen the planetary in both the 25" and Hector my 20" so it is something you can see if you take the time and effort.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 13-01-2015, 03:55 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by hector View Post
That would be me, I found the post with shots of my planetary and wanted to say thanks. For those that are interested we have seen the planetary in both the 25" and Hector my 20" so it is something you can see if you take the time and effort.
So is it actually named after you Andrew?..how cool

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 13-01-2015, 04:41 PM
hector (Andrew)
Registered User

hector is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Umina NSW Australia
Posts: 279
It most certainly is. Discovered by me in 2004 and confirmed as a Planetary 5 years later.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 27-04-2015, 08:54 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Hi Steve,

Great image.

I am a lot late to this thread as I wasn't aware anyone on IIS had imaged it. I only stubbled on this thread while searching for another thread on IIS re Murrell 1.

Just some info which you may or may not wish to correct in the notations on your website re this target.

This planetary nebula was only discovered in 2004 by Andrew Murrell of the Astronomical Society of New South Wales. The diameter is 105" x 100" and the magnitude of the central star is about 18. Apparently it has been seen in a 25" scope at TSP.

I think you have confused its visual observation at the real TSP with it's visual observation in a 25" telescope at the Deepest South Texas Star Safari, which is an event hosted by 3RF Australia and held at Coonabarabran every year. Andrew, myself and a few of our US visitors have observed Murrell 1 visually over the past 8 years at different times in the 25"/F5 Obsessions and 30"/F4.5 SDM


For those interested here is some more information on Murrell 1 and its discovery and verification.

Murrell 1

Type : PN
Co-ordinates : RA: 15 06 17.13 Dec -41 45 18.4 J2000.0
Central star mag: approx 18
Image link: http://stdatu.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_...e&fov=NONE&v3=
Discoverer : Andrew Murrell, Mount Kaputar 21-Feb-2004
Verified: Brian Skiff, Lowell Observatory 22-Feb-2004
Verification image: Steve Lee, Coonabarabran 3-Mar-2004
Reported not in MASH database: David Frew, Department of Physics, Macquarie University 5-Mar-2004
Verification spectroscopy: David Frew, 2.3m telescope, Coonabarabran, circa 22-Jul-2004


Second to Andrew I have probably observed this target visually more than anyone else. I had previously only ever been able to observe it visually in telescopes of 25" aperture and larger. I had tried a couple of times in Andrew's 20"/F5 and while he was able to see it, I wasn't. I have also tried a few times in my own 18"/F4.5 without success. I have an ability to see deeper than most but I think Andrew must have a 20mm pupil dilation to see as deep as he does. Regardless of telescope size and observer skill, it requires good optics, good eyepieces, clear transparent skies, very dark skies, excellent dark adaption and high target altitude above the horizon.

At the most recent Ozsky event which finished last Friday (formerly Deepest South Texas Star Safari) I was able to observe it last Wednesday evening in James Pierces 16"/F4 SDM. The skies were very good and transparent and the target was located at zenith. Andrew, myself and James Pierce all observed it in the 16" scope. Several others on the field were able to observe it in one of the 25"/F5 Obsessions. Visually, it appears more triangular in shape than circular due to the lower brightness of a couple of the outer sections.

Irrespective of the telescope size it is a very dim difficult visual target. Notwithstanding that it may be above the horizon, I believe it is to far South to be successfully seen from locations as far North as Texas. Here is an account of our Texan friends Van Robinson and Jimi Lowrey's attempt to observe it visually in Jimi's 48"/F4 Newtonian. Jimi is located at Limpia Crossing Fort Davis Texas which is less than 10km from the Prude Ranch, which is the site of TSP

*********************************** *******************
Even though it is down near the dirt, we decided to give Murrell 1 a go through Jimi Lowrey's 48", here in the frozen hinterlands of the far North.
We had to lie in the cacti and kick the rattlesnakes out of the way to get to the eyepiece.

Using a 17mm Ethos which gave 330X, and a UHC filter, we squinted through the haze.

Nada.

--van
*********************************** ******************


Cheers
John B
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement