Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-06-2012, 01:33 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
binoviewer question

Hi all,
Thinking of getting a binoviewer for myself to save all that squinting. I have narrowed it down to either WO or Stellavue (budget around $300, including basic pair of EPs).
Has anyone got either of those? Your opinions?
Thanks, Bo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-06-2012, 06:00 PM
sopticals's Avatar
sopticals (Stephen)
Registered User

sopticals is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oamaru, New Zealand.
Posts: 226
Hi Bo,

I have the WO binoviewer package: Binoviewer body, 1.6x barlow/corrector, and a pair of 20mm (66deg) WO eyepieces. I actually purchased two complete packages from the Williams Optics shop located on Ebay US$199 each plus US$14.99 postage. The items arrived at my address in NZ in four days (super quick). Of course I tested both both systems in my 14"f5.09 dob. One unit was sharper overall than the other, but really both performed ok. I had no trouble merging images with either set,(apparently some folk do have some difficulty in this respect). I kept the better performing unit and moved the other on, so the exercise did not cost me). I did have to move the secondary mirror 1.5-1.75 inches closer to the primary to get enough "infocus".

The binoviewers have revolutionised my viewing of moon, planets, globulars, nebulae etc. The claim is that two eyed viewing ups contrast and resolution by up to 40%. Plus the 3-D effect is jaw-dropping.

I dont think the Stellavue units come with correctors or eyepieces.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-06-2012, 08:59 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Thanks Stephen, I saw the WO package on EBay as you described, but they cost $20 to post to Oz .
From what I can gather SV do not come with correctors, so I am leaning towards WO at the moment.
Thanks, Bo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-06-2012, 02:52 AM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
I have a pair of WO binoviewers, and I'm very happy with them. If I won tatts I'd spring for a pair of Denkmeier's with their bigger mirrors, but until then I'll stick with the cheaper two eyed view. I don't notice any vignetting most of the time. Much more relaxing for prolonged viewing (& sketching).

I thought that the SV, WO, Seiberts and Burgess Optical versions were all basically rebadged versions of the same thing, with perhaps some QC differences in the selection process after manufacture.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-06-2012, 08:05 AM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
Yep they are the same units
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement