ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 22.7%
|
|

26-05-2011, 02:58 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: wollongong
Posts: 523
|
|
Swinburne Astronomy Online
Anyone completed a course with SAO ?
I'm interested in taking a short course, but would like to get a review of it if anyone has already completed
Thanks
Stu
|

26-05-2011, 03:26 PM
|
 |
Mozzies love me!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,287
|
|
Stu,
Not sure about Swinburne but I did a Certficate in Astronomy via distance education from the University of Central Lancashire. Their website is www.studyastronomy.com. It was a great course, I learnt quite a bit and I would thoroughly recommend it.
Cheers,
Mario
|

26-05-2011, 03:44 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Ward
Anyone completed a course with SAO ?
I'm interested in taking a short course, but would like to get a review of it if anyone has already completed
Thanks
Stu
|
Ask Trevor (Quark). He did a certificate/diploma course through them awhile back. He'll be able to tell you all about it
James Cook Uni also offer various courses online as well....from certificate courses right up to PhD level degrees 
I not long ago finished my Masters degree
Graduated on 16th April.
|

26-05-2011, 04:28 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
|
|
I can see there are 2 styles of courses, Short Courses for interested Astronomers, and the others courses split into 3 categories.
Short courses I think are open to anyone, while the others are similar to full time courses. I am just finishing the Astronomy 101 and Planetary Science 101 courses at Curtin University in WA which are similar to SAO Graduate Certificate of Science courses.
Is this what you are interested in or the Short courses?
|

26-05-2011, 06:30 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: wollongong
Posts: 523
|
|
I was looking at the short course as I have no related qualifications that would qualify for other courses
Stu
|

26-05-2011, 06:42 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Go to the website and see what you can do, then apply 
|

26-05-2011, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
|
|
I noticed some demo information available but not sure if it is for Short courses or Under/Graduate courses.
I think the short courses look good, and was considering it last year but decided to go for full time studies instead. The advantage of in house education is assistance with others in the class both during and after.
I am not sure I would do this for Full time courses but short courses should be fine.
|

04-06-2011, 09:18 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 11
|
|
I've been pondering one of the Swinburne offerings too! Would
I'm leaning toward the Grad Dip but I am uncertain as to the entry requirements. Any know what they mean by "recognised tertiary qualification"? Something from the sciences? Or maths? Heck, even economics?
Failing that, I've been also looking at the Monash Grad Dip of Science that also offers a major in Astronomy. But enrolment will only be for 2012 :-(. The beauty of the Monash course is that, I am certain, it is even open to someone like me with a crappy commerce degree (albeit with Honours)!
@mswhin63
How are you finding the course? Enjoyable?
|

04-06-2011, 09:28 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Most of these courses usually require you to have some training in a science and/or with some maths component. Or another degree with an appropriate amount of maths of the right type (e.g. engineering, B.A. in physical geography...remote sensing/GIS courses, climatology/meteorology, BEd with science/maths concentration). However, if you can prove that you can handle the requirements and you have a degree, you might get in. No harm in trying
If you wanted to do a certificate course and then work your way in by doing that, I would imagine you could progress further along.
|

04-06-2011, 09:49 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodie
@mswhin63
How are you finding the course? Enjoyable?
|
I am lucky to be studying a Curtin Uni but mainly getting my math, basic physics and Chem up to scratch before entering properly.
Astronomy 101 very hard for my level over all only 70% but the last 3 assignments have been over 90%, Planetary Science 101 very easy over 90% in assessments so far.
For me it is a wonderful experience and not looking back. It has been 30 years since I studied like this, so it is a bit of a challenge.
|

04-06-2011, 11:10 PM
|
 |
A Lazy Astronomer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
|
|
I did the first 4 units at SAO. To be frank I felt like I was paying $1000 per unit for a piece of paper. There is no teaching done on these courses, but I never went to Uni so I don't know if that is normal! You buy your books, you follow the course outline (what to read) then do the tests, do a project and pass your unit then move onto the next one. I got HDs for very little effort.
Personally I feel the money is better spent on say a new scope or camera. If you want/need the bit of paper, then sure, spend your $15,000.
Cheers
|

04-06-2011, 11:26 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Vic
Posts: 465
|
|
If you want to undertake an astronomy course but not concerned about getting the formal recognition, then Berkeley University USA offers this course online by Alex Filipenko - and its free.
http://webcast.berkeley.edu/course_d...sid=1906978460
I have just completed all the classes and have greatly increased my knowledge and interest in astronomy and cosmology. Although it is the 2007 course it is still very good and worth the time. Could even be used as a precursor to a full time course.
Rod

|

04-06-2011, 11:32 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
The courses are designed so you don't have to attend lectures, Dave. Despite not being in a regular class situation, you still get the same level of education as you would otherwise. They give people who don't have the time, or the opportunity to goto an uni the chance to do the same courses as their uni-bound colleagues are attending. Yes, they are self paced and such, but you get the same level of attention as would at a class in uni. More so in some areas, actually. There's no great shakes for attending a class at uni...it can be very stressful and not very productive, plus you don't have all the distractions which are present in an on campus class situation.
If you were getting HD's that easily in your subject, you should've considered doing the masters degree at least. If you were so inclined, you could go onto the PhD. That way, you would find it much easier to converse with the pro's on their own level, simply because you'd have the necessary academic qualifications to back yourself up.
|

04-06-2011, 11:33 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarge
If you want to undertake an astronomy course but not concerned about getting the formal recognition, then Berkeley University USA offers this course online by Alex Filipenko - and its free.
http://webcast.berkeley.edu/course_d...sid=1906978460
I have just completed all the classes and have greatly increased my knowledge and interest in astronomy and cosmology. Although it is the 2007 course it is still very good and worth the time. Could even be used as a precursor to a full time course.
Rod
 
|
Alex is a pretty cool guy 
He's one of the adjunct professors at JCU.
|

04-06-2011, 11:37 PM
|
![[1ponders]'s Avatar](../vbiis/customavatars/avatar45_9.gif) |
Retired, damn no pension
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
|
|
I'm with David on this. Boring as ..... well you know what. I chose my own topics for the assignments/projects (with oks from the lecturer) to try to keep it interesting. Bulletin boards are boring (no live interaction) and when you mix white belts (newbies) with black belts (done plenty of online education), it tend to turn those white belts right off when questions get slammed by the BBs.
I did two semesters, HD's pretty easy. The main reason I enrolled was for the imaging units. I walked away after 6 weeks of the first one. Extremely disappointed. James Cook Uni has an online one you might want to look at.
As a professional educator and teacher of 20 years experience as well, it never ceases to amaze me how universities can continue not to teach.
|

04-06-2011, 11:44 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,109
|
|
Hi Stu,
I completed a Grad Cert Sc with SAO back in 2005 and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. It is online and you get out of it what you are willing to put in. I found all of the unit instructors and project supervisors that I had were very supportive and helpful, offering as much feedback as I wanted. I looked at the minimum requirements for each unit and made sure that I well and truly exceeded them in all respects. I graduated with straight HD's and was latter presented with my faculties award for excellence. The Centre for Astrophysics & Super Computing which SAO is within, is a centre for research astronomy. Swinburne is the only Australian University with a time allocation on the Keck telescopes in Hawaii. I was very fortunate to travel to Hawaii with a Swinburne research team headed up by Professor Duncan Forbes, we had 2 nights observing on Keck II, Duncan was the unit supervisor for my final unit at Swinburne. I suppose you will get different opinions from different people on this matter but for me, it was an incredibly rewarding experience.
Regards
Trevor
|

04-06-2011, 11:46 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
I'm with David on this. Boring as ..... well you know what. I chose my own topics for the assignments/projects (with oks from the lecturer) to try to keep it interesting. Bulletin boards are boring (no live interaction) and when you mix white belts (newbies) with black belts (done plenty of online education), it tend to turn those white belts right off when questions get slammed by the BBs.
I did two semesters, HD's pretty easy. The main reason I enrolled was for the imaging units. I walked away after 6 weeks of the first one. Extremely disappointed. James Cook Uni has an online one you might want to look at.
As a professional educator and teacher of 20 years experience as well, it never ceases to amaze me how universities can continue not to teach.
|
You've run into the wrong types in a course and they've hammered you down. It's a pity, but you do get effete snobs like that in some course and unis. JCU has a very good course and I would recommend it to anyone. It also depends on what you like...you did it for the imaging bits, but found something lacking. You should've said so to the lecturers. However, in so far as the rest of the courses were structured, you may not have had any interest in the other subjects...I don't know.
Some people find trying to do an online course difficult because they like that personal interaction....the distractions....of doing an on campus course. Others can work through both, whilst others are better off doing it on their own. Like I said to David, being on campus is not the great shakes some make it out to be. They probably spend most of their time in the clubs and doing "extracurricular" activities   . That's why they like it.
|

04-06-2011, 11:52 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quark
Hi Stu,
I completed a Grad Cert Sc with SAO back in 2005 and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. It is online and you get out of it what you are willing to put in. I found all of the unit instructors and project supervisors that I had were very supportive and helpful, offering as much feedback as I wanted. I looked at the minimum requirements for each unit and made sure that I well and truly exceeded them in all respects. I graduated with straight HD's and was latter presented with my faculties award for excellence. The Centre for Astrophysics & Super Computing which SAO is within, is a centre for research astronomy. Swinburne is the only Australian University with a time allocation on the Keck telescopes in Hawaii. I was very fortunate to travel to Hawaii with a Swinburne research team headed up by Professor Duncan Forbes, we had 2 nights observing on Keck II, Duncan was the unit supervisor for my final unit at Swinburne. I suppose you will get different opinions from different people on this matter but for me, it was an incredibly rewarding experience.
Regards
Trevor
|
Exactly, Trevor. You get out what you're willing to put in. The SAO course has a very good reputation, not only in Australia, but overseas as well.
|

05-06-2011, 12:30 AM
|
 |
Country living & viewing
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
|
|
I did a masters in astronomy at UWS before it stopped being offered. The lecturers almost all moved to JCU and they now offer the same courses at JCU. The prerequisite was any bachelor degree. It didn't have to be in a science. My year had people with medical degrees, science degrees, music degrees and others I can't remember. Just contact JCU and ask them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodie
I've been pondering one of the Swinburne offerings too! Would
I'm leaning toward the Grad Dip but I am uncertain as to the entry requirements. Any know what they mean by "recognised tertiary qualification"? Something from the sciences? Or maths? Heck, even economics?
Failing that, I've been also looking at the Monash Grad Dip of Science that also offers a major in Astronomy. But enrolment will only be for 2012 :-(. The beauty of the Monash course is that, I am certain, it is even open to someone like me with a crappy commerce degree (albeit with Honours)!
@mswhin63
How are you finding the course? Enjoyable?
|
|

05-06-2011, 09:21 AM
|
![[1ponders]'s Avatar](../vbiis/customavatars/avatar45_9.gif) |
Retired, damn no pension
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
You've run into the wrong types in a course and they've hammered you down. It's a pity, but you do get effete snobs like that in some course and unis. JCU has a very good course and I would recommend it to anyone. It also depends on what you like...you did it for the imaging bits, but found something lacking. You should've said so to the lecturers. However, in so far as the rest of the courses were structured, you may not have had any interest in the other subjects...I don't know.
Some people find trying to do an online course difficult because they like that personal interaction....the distractions....of doing an on campus course. Others can work through both, whilst others are better off doing it on their own. Like I said to David, being on campus is not the great shakes some make it out to be. They probably spend most of their time in the clubs and doing "extracurricular" activities   . That's why they like it.
|
Oh I don't have a problem with BBs, I'll happily mix it with the best. I did notice it with other students though. I've been including online components in my courses, as well as helping to design online courses since the early 2000s and I'm well familiar with them in a variety of forms. From my experience, SU was well down towards the bottom of the pile when it came to effective teaching methods and encouraging involvement. Not to mention outdated information. I think we spent 4 weeks discussing film photography using hyped films. The kodak film they were discussing hadn't been commercially produced by kodak for something like 4 years by then and you couldn't get it for love nor money.
I sent a number of emails to lectures and course coordinators. Not a reply. I then sent a letter to the faculty head, explaining my experience in the education and online training industry. The email was, I believed balanced with positives and areas for improvement. Not a reply from anyone.Funnily enough though they are still quite happy to send me advertising asking if i want to complete the course.
Nah, it'll be a cold day in hell before I head back there or recommend an online course there.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:19 PM.
|
|