Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-02-2011, 10:58 PM
Heath's Avatar
Heath (Heater)
Registered User

Heath is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 193
Magnification DSLR photography

Hi all,

Just wondering whether maginifaction through a barlow is an accepted method for astrophotography with a dslr? If so, I'd image quality of barlow lens would be very important?

Regards
Heath
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-02-2011, 12:01 AM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
What sort of scope and mount would you be using Heath? Prime focus is the usually preferred technique whereby the DSLR is mounted without a lens such that focus is reached on the DSLR sensor. "Magnification" depends on your scope's focal length.

Its usually preferable to avoid barlows while you're starting out, as the extra length creates a greater moment arm for movement/flexure, more difficult balance, and the longer focal length makes guiding a LOT harder. All this applies a lot less if you're talking a webcam for planetary work - then you really need the extra focal length for resolution and short exposures mean movement in focal train less an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-02-2011, 12:11 AM
Heath's Avatar
Heath (Heater)
Registered User

Heath is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 193
Hi Rob,

Im using an F7 set up - 105 refractor and canon dslr. I was thinking of increased magnification to capture deep space objects with some more detail.


Thanks Heath
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
What sort of scope and mount would you be using Heath? Prime focus is the usually preferred technique whereby the DSLR is mounted without a lens such that focus is reached on the DSLR sensor. "Magnification" depends on your scope's focal length.

Its usually preferable to avoid barlows while you're starting out, as the extra length creates a greater moment arm for movement/flexure, more difficult balance, and the longer focal length makes guiding a LOT harder. All this applies a lot less if you're talking a webcam for planetary work - then you really need the extra focal length for resolution and short exposures mean movement in focal train less an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-02-2011, 12:43 AM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
There's no harm giving it a go, but often you'll find a 200% crop gives as much detail as the barlow because of reasons I mentioned. Depends on quality of gear, mount, fittings etc too of course. I'm sure a Paramount ME wouldn't care if your camera stuck out a few extra inches....

Last edited by RobF; 19-02-2011 at 09:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-02-2011, 02:13 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
The problem with most Barlows is Chromatic aberration would need to image RGB which cant be done on DSLR easily.

Mine is a 5 element barlow design to reduce CA, I still experience some when capturing planets.

Your scope is middle range, you get some good closer shots without the use of a barlow. Maybe try without first then consider maybe a Powermate instead of a barlow.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement