Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-08-2009, 12:16 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,277
M30 and something

Target: M30 and a Ghostly Nebula
Camera: Canon 350d modified, WO F2 FR, Baader 2” Skyglow filter
Exposure Capture: DLSR Focus
Scope: GSO CF RC200
EFR: f/6
Mount: EQ6 Pro
Exposure Setting: Prime focus, ISO800 ICNR off Daylight WB
Exposures: 1x180s, 10 X330s, 1/8/09
Seeing: waxing gibbous 80% moon
Guiding: Orion Starshoot Autoguider using PHD with ED80
Focus: DSLR Focus
Stacking: DSS 8 darks plus flats, no bias applied
Processing: CS3


Right Ascension 21 : 40.4 (h:m)
Declination -23 : 11 (deg:m)
Distance 26.1 (kly)
Visual Brightness 7.2 (mag)
Apparent Dimension 12.0 (arc min)
Discovered 1764 by Charles Messier.
Globular cluster Messier 30 (M30, NGC 7099), at about 26,000 light years distance and about 90 light years across, and appears to us under an angular diameter of about 12.0 arc minutes. It is fairly dense (as its concentration class V indicates), and a fine object in even small telescopes. Its brightest red giant stars are about of apparent visual magnitude 12.1, its horizontal branch giants at magnitude 15.1. Only about 12 variable stars have been found in this globular cluster. A color-magnitude diagram (CMD) of M30 can be found in Richer et.al. (1988). Its overall spectral type has been determined as F3, and its color index was given as B-V=0.60 mag. It is approaching us at 181.9 km/s.
The core of M30 exhibits an extremely dense stellar population, and has undergone a core collapse, similar to at least 20 other of the 150 globulars in the Milky Way Galaxy, including M15, M70, and possibly M62. Consequently, M30's core is very small in extension, only about 0.12 arc minutes (7.2 arc seconds, corresponding to a linear diameter of 0.9 light years), and its half-mass radius is 1.15 arc min (8.7 light years); half of this cluster's mass is concentrated in a spherical volume of a radius equal to the distance of Sirius from us, or 17.4 light years diameter. On the other hand, its tidal radius is large: 18.34 arc minutes, corresponding to a linear radius of 139 light years. Beyond that distance, member stars would escape simply because of the Milky Way Galaxy's tidal gravitational forces.
Despite its compressed core, close encounters of the member stars of globular cluster M30 seem to have occurred comparatively rare, as it appears to contain only few X-ray binary stars, according to investigations with the Chandra X-ray Observatory satellite. These particular stellar systems are thought to form in close encounters as they occur occasionally in the denser zones of globular clusters.
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin mentions that a dwarf nova had occurred in M30; another one has been detected in M5 and a third in NGC 6712. M30 was one of the original discoveries of Charles Messier, who cataloged it on August 3, 1764 and like most of his globulars, described it as round nebula, containing no stars. It was first resolved by William Herschel around 1784. The brightest stars of M30 can be seen in telescopes starting at or even just below 4-inch aperture.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (m30 iis.jpg)
170.2 KB91 views

Last edited by TrevorW; 02-08-2009 at 12:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2009, 12:23 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Oh yes it's there alright, it's called The Great Iturnalreflexun Nebula, first discovered by the Romainian astronomer Ites Notbaffled. It only shows up under rare sky conditions

M30 is an interesting glob, has little spikes of star

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2009, 12:26 PM
ngcles's Avatar
ngcles
The Observologist

ngcles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Billimari, NSW Central West
Posts: 1,664
Hi Trevor,

Re the "mystery object" -- it is some sort of internal reflection within the optical train -- no doubt at all.

What of? Jupiter me thinks -- about 8 degrees away from M30 is a candidate.

Best,

Les D
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2009, 12:26 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,277
Mike I thought the same thing

but what could have been causing it ???
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2009, 12:32 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Wow... Needs some sorting by the looks. Is everything fully flocked Trevor? That's pretty drastic
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2009, 12:40 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,277
I haven't flocked the baffle but no reflections showed up in any of my other two recent images oh well back to the drawing board???
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2009, 01:53 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Trevor, you didn't leave a mark on the chip with that new cleaning dooby you bought???

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2009, 02:00 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,277
No I've taken flats and normal images and no marks appear. The Arctic Butterfly is a brush system.

I noticed there was still dew on the secondary and some on the primary this morning, so I'm wondering considering the conditions last night whether it may have been caused through dewing

???
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2009, 06:04 PM
peeb61's Avatar
peeb61 (Paul)
Always looking up

peeb61 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 730
Hi Trevor,
You have captured the Nexus!
Nice image overall.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2009, 06:46 PM
pgc hunter's Avatar
pgc hunter
Registered User

pgc hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Renmark, SA
Posts: 2,993
I believe it is straylight from an outside source. Could be anything from a streetlight that happened to shine in your tube, to a meteor bright enough to cause internal reflections in your optics that whisked past close to M30 during your exposure.

Les makes an interesting point about Jupiter, but at 8º distance, that's probably a bit too distant for an object of that brightness to interfere, especially as drastically as it did in your image.

The waxing gibbious moon was in Scorpious on the date of your image, so it perhaps could be the culprit?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2009, 07:16 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by peeb61 View Post
Hi Trevor,
You have captured the Nexus!
Nice image overall.

Paul
You may be right I saw that movie too

I've checked out a number of sites on the net and cannot find any images of internal reflections looking even remotely like this

previous internal reflection images have looked uniform when taking images of M83 (this is the only time I've had the reflections appear)

no internal reflections appear when taking images of nebula or open starfields with this scope

this ones a mystery to me

Last edited by TrevorW; 03-08-2009 at 11:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement