Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #81  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:30 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
hey asimov, just noticed, well done on 1000 posts!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:32 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Yep! 6.5mm in an f5 - f6 is fairly useless. For Mags like that it is better to Barlow a 12mm.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:34 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
sh1t, iceman is viewing this thread, quick ken and asimov, as they say in school, "back on task you three gentleman down the back!!"

.....as i was saying ken and asimov, the series 500 acro something and eso dozzer and picto namometer setting are offset by the need to extrapolate the visual doo dad to become effective to realist setting!!! don't you think???
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:39 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Ummm. Thanks Dave. Totally agree...ummm the field lens in relation to the umm field-stop..
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:39 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Quote:
iceman is viewing this thread
Beat me to it, was just about to say stop spamming guys.

And david please don't try and bypass the censored word filter, it's there for a reason. This is a family site.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:39 PM
elusiver's Avatar
elusiver
i like lookin at stuff.

elusiver is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ferntree Gully
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by asimov
No coatings means you can safely clean em' on your pants leg without doing any harm.
my vote for call of the night

el
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:43 PM
elusiver's Avatar
elusiver
i like lookin at stuff.

elusiver is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ferntree Gully
Posts: 433
i'm laughing so hard.. there's no emoticon to describe how much i'm laughing.. but seriously guys.. back to the s500's.. we got our ATM section!!!! so least keep on subject for mike.

el
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:46 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
I was!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:53 PM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
I see a lot of people bagging their s500 ep's and saying that they might put others off the hobby. But you are all still interested...maybe those that are keen will find out for themselves as you all seem to have done, that better ep's give better views. When you get 2 boxes and no booklet and only one badly copied page on how to assemble your new toy, you know it's not top of the range and a few accessories are needed.
Anyone who gives up after a few looks through their scope were never really interested anyway and no doubt the telescope will end up beside the golf clubs,tennis racket,pool cue,bowling ball,footy boots,judo gear,basketball hoop,compound bow......
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:57 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
oops naughty corner again!!
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 11-08-2005, 11:57 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by elusiver
i think there's basically 2 trains of thought on this issue. I mean.. if you start with poor.. the only way is up, whereas if u start with average good.. you might be dissapointed with future purchases as they aren't THAT much better than what you have.
I think most who have used their GS dobs with decent eyepieces would agree that the s500 really lets the scope down and prevents it from displaying its true potential.
There is no reason why an observer cant be satisfied with decent plossls for the rest of their observing life as the sharpness of view and contrast can near enough equal anything on the market. Its when people want quality wide views or extra eye relief at short focal lengths that eyepieces become expensive.

Buying poor quality just costs extra in the long run when you replace it.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:01 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
i have no probs with 4 free series 500 eye pieces that i received with my 10" dob. they work ok. all my freinds and family were ok looking thru them. they do however love and comment on the differnence of "the easier on the eye" views from the ultra wide 30mm
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:32 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
thanks dave, I too have not had problems with 500s. they focus and you can see stuff... ok they arent televue but then you arent paying hundreds for them either. my 6.5mm 500 give ok views and works on tight doubles when the seeing is good...
think we'll just wait for mikes review.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:40 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidpretorius
actually ken, the 40mm was not too bad as a starter, the 6.5mm is probably the worst
you are going to need good seeing to properly use the 6.5mm anyhow dave. in my scope it gives almost 200x magnification. its more in yours cause you have a longer FL.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 13-08-2005, 03:34 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
I have being trying to think of a good simile for using s500 plossls with a GS dob, but I think this is a reasonable one.....

"Its a bit like buying a quality high powered stereo system, and listening to it through speakers from an old el-cheapo 3 in one system."
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 13-08-2005, 05:00 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starkler
"Its a bit like buying a quality high powered stereo system, and listening to Britney Spears"
fixed your similie to suit better the way i feel...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement