Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 05-12-2008, 04:45 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
and the moral to the story...

things can be more complex than they first appear.

I used to hate such questions where if you really looked at the problem there was more to it than what you had been told in class.

Some many times I was at odds with the teachers with such issues..they called me disruptive and not interested when in fact I was more interested and concerned with truth than anyone else in class.

alex
  #22  
Old 05-12-2008, 04:58 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
Hmmm. 4Gs coming out of the hand. I don't think so with a juggling action. A quick calculation shows that if the pin is in the hand for one second (perhaps a reasonable time frame), the pin will exit the hand at over 140 km/hr.

Regards

Steven
You failed to take into account that the pin arrives at a speed and exits at the same speed but in the opposite direction. If the pin arrives in the hand at 70km/h and is accelerated in the opposite direction and leaves the hand at 70km/h, then you have a differential speed of 140km/h, but only a throwing speed of 70km/h, which is reasonable.

-70 +140 = +70

I would imagine the pin would be in the hand for a shorter period than this, and I only used 1 second in the hand as an example because it made the underlying math more easy to understand.

An exact acceleration equivalent to 4G's (upwards) is the only acceleration acceptible and possible for the juggler to juggle 5 pins with a smooth motion.
  #23  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:08 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
and the moral to the story...

things can be more complex than they first appear.

I used to hate such questions where if you really looked at the problem there was more to it than what you had been told in class.

Some many times I was at odds with the teachers with such issues..they called me disruptive and not interested when in fact I was more interested and concerned with truth than anyone else in class.

alex
The moral to the story for me in school was "teachers can be idiots that don't know jack apart from what is written in the book infront of them". I had some fantastic teachers in school, & I had some real dunces. I consistantly scored distinctions in the school science competitions however, and I have a fair amount of faith in my own ability to disseminate a problem and work out an answer.
  #24  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:23 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Well Steven (with respect to all those wonderful teachers who I think are great doing what they do) teachers never have left school and therefore somewhat insulated from some of lifes realities.

But heck ex teachers always made the best sales people which I attribute to management of groups of children...management of buyer lists and listing prospects is very similar because you need to understand each individual and what makes them tick.

I employed ex teachers readily because they mostly were great performers in sales.

AND Steven your ability is very evident you always provide very well considered views... just dont fall into the teachers trap of believing everything you read...particulary about dark matter

alex
  #25  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:34 PM
DJDD
Registered User

DJDD is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Well Steven (with respect to all those wonderful teachers who I think are great doing what they do) teachers never have left school and therefore somewhat insulated from some of lifes realities

which realties are those?
  #26  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:38 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Please folks this is simple year 11 or 12 physics. The juggler as a time average weighs 47 + 10 kg. Those pins dont hover by themselves.

Remember F delta t and change in momentum.

See here for the theory! It even goes into Relativity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion


If I was the teacher I would explain it as gravitational potential energy being equivalent to the kinetic energy of the pin depending on how far it was thrown up! The impulse needed F delta t gives you the change in momentum and hence the energy and then you can calculate a time averaged force. As a time average the juggler weighs his 47kg + 10kg of pins.


Bert

Last edited by avandonk; 05-12-2008 at 06:56 PM.
  #27  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:55 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal View Post
You failed to take into account that the pin arrives at a speed and exits at the same speed but in the opposite direction. If the pin arrives in the hand at 70km/h and is accelerated in the opposite direction and leaves the hand at 70km/h, then you have a differential speed of 140km/h, but only a throwing speed of 70km/h, which is reasonable.

-70 +140 = +70
That makes no sense at all. The juggler catches the pin. The physics of catching an object involves bringing the object to rest while the hand is subjected to a short term impulse force. If the object isn't brought to rest you have a collision or hitting action.

If in fact the pin drops into the juggler's hand at 70 km/hr under 1g acceleration, then the juggler has thrown the pin to a height of over 19 metres. Yet another improbable scenario for juggling.

Steven
  #28  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:19 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
That makes no sense at all. The juggler catches the pin. The physics of catching an object involves bringing the object to rest while the hand is subjected to a short term impulse force. If the object isn't brought to rest you have a collision or hitting action.
Steven
What? You aren't even making any sense.
  #29  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:21 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
If in fact the pin drops into the juggler's hand at 70 km/hr under 1g acceleration, then the juggler has thrown the pin to a height of over 19 metres. Yet another improbable scenario for juggling.

Steven
So change the 1 second throw time ffs. It was just used as an example to explain the freaking maths
  #30  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:22 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk View Post
Please folks this is simple year 11 or 12 physics. The juggler as a time average weighs 47 + 10 kg. Those pins dont hover by themselves.

Remember F delta t and change in momentum.

See here for the theory! It even goes into Relativity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion


If I was the teacher I would explain it as gravitational potential energy being equivalent to the kinetic energy of the pin depending on how far it was thrown up! The impulse needed F delta t gives you the change in momentum and hence the energy and then you can calculate a time averaged force. As a time average the juggler weighs his 47kg + 10kg of pins.


Bert
You are stating the obvious but the point of the discussion is to select conditions that are within the physical capabilities of the juggler to prove the point.

Regards

Steven
  #31  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:27 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
AND Steven your ability is very evident you always provide very well considered views... just dont fall into the teachers trap of believing everything you read...particulary about dark matter

alex
Alex,

It's the scientist coming out of me wanting to perform a test to verify the assertion.

Steven
  #32  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:28 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
No, the point of the discussion is to explain why the correct answer is 'E'

The conditions are irrelevant, and were only selected to allow me to explain the mathematical concept behind why the answer is 'E'
  #33  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:02 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Are you trying to say a good juggler could do it? If you integrate the force over the time no matter how gradual, the momentum change still is the same. This is a waste of my time. The answer is self evident to anyone who knows 12th year physics.

Bert
  #34  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:22 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJDD View Post
which realties are those?
That you are not always right.
alex
  #35  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:19 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk View Post
Are you trying to say a good juggler could do it? If you integrate the force over the time no matter how gradual, the momentum change still is the same. This is a waste of my time. The answer is self evident to anyone who knows 12th year physics.

Bert
The juggler cannot cross the bridge. Have I made that clear enough?

Should I also make it clear that the solution be realistic that factors in the physical limitations imposed by the juggler?

In mathematical terms it's known as a boundary value condition.

Thanks for wasting my time having to explain this to you.
  #36  
Old 06-12-2008, 06:18 AM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shnoz View Post
Ah Thanks for helping!
No problem, glad I could help!
  #37  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:13 AM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal View Post
No, the point of the discussion is to explain why the correct answer is 'E'

The conditions are irrelevant, and were only selected to allow me to explain the mathematical concept behind why the answer is 'E'
Your maths is not even right. Go back and do your sums.

Last edited by sjastro; 06-12-2008 at 08:17 AM. Reason: Spelling
  #38  
Old 06-12-2008, 01:04 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
Your maths is not even right. Go back and do your sums.
Troll
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Don't_feed_the_troll.jpg)
25.1 KB17 views
  #39  
Old 06-12-2008, 01:44 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Reaction force on bridge caused by accelerating pin at 4G.

F= 2 X 4 X 9.8 = 78.4 kgf. Definitely not answer E).

Let the facts speak for themselves.
  #40  
Old 06-12-2008, 01:59 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal View Post
Troll
You are joking?

(1) He posted in this thread before you.
(2) He has more posts in this thread than you.

Why not just present your maths?

Paul
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement