Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-10-2008, 08:26 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Photoshop CS4

http://www.adobe.com/ap/products/pho...re/?sdid=DQATV

I wasn't even aware this had been released.

How did I manage to miss all the release fanfare and hoopla?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-10-2008, 08:56 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Got it on my desk Matt. Still have to get around to installing it on my newly-bought 64-bit Quad-core machine. Should be noice!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-10-2008, 09:13 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
Is it still 32bit software or is this the 64bit version?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-10-2008, 09:23 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tandum View Post
Is it still 32bit software or is this the 64bit version?
CS4 is available (at least on Vista and XP) in a native 64 bit version. The only watchout is that any plugins you use may not be until their developers catch up.

I can't wait to have 64-bit versions of Photoshop and LightRoom running on my machine which has 8Gb of RAM to muck with and Vista Ultimate 64. Even though I haven't loaded CS4 yet, every other app that I have running concurrently doesn't seem to undertand that other apps are running at the same time - there's just no lag time in anything... snap, snap, snap!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-10-2008, 09:26 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
That's a nice set-up you got there, Chris. Drool!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-10-2008, 09:41 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt View Post
That's a nice set-up you got there, Chris. Drool!!!!!!!!!!
Cheap as chips Matt. Seriously!

The "barebones" system I bought from a little guy in Crows Nest was only $1,497.00 - plus a bit more for the extra 4Gb of RAM. All up - including a 750GB disk and an OEM copy of Vista Ultimate 64. Not bad. THe Q9550 QuadCore is amazing. At 2.88GHz it isn't the fastest available (3GHz) - but were talking symantics at that stage.

Last edited by Omaroo; 25-10-2008 at 02:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-10-2008, 10:02 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Yeah. It's pretty amazing what you can get these days without spending tons of cash.

Who would have thought we'd reach the stage where 2 or 3GB of RAM, a 250 or 320GB HDD, 15.4" hi-res LCD screen, and all the other bells and buzzers would be considered 'standard' in a laptop! And all for $1000...or thereabouts.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-10-2008, 05:47 PM
monoxide's Avatar
monoxide
Registered User

monoxide is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 658
sounds good Chris,
i've got the Q9550 also but with 4gb of ddr3.
the Q9550 is a great overclocker too, im running mine at 3.6ghz

i might have to check out the x64 version of CS4
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-10-2008, 06:10 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,900
Does CS4 support GPGPU load balancing (I think its just 2D canvas rotate functions - not even Pixel Blender made it in - but may be added in the not too distant future)? Having 384 stream processors per each modern GPU process data fed from a single or dual CPU Quad core system would be very nice - that would give around a 35x speed up by my rough calculations (better still if you had 2 -> 4 Big GPUs) - then even your most complex manupulations - taking minutes now - would be real time, sub second rendering)!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-10-2008, 06:58 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
meh! psp 13 is better
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-10-2008, 07:28 PM
vindictive666's Avatar
vindictive666 (John)
KeyboardNotFndPressAnyKey

vindictive666 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: geraldton western australia
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by ving View Post
meh! psp 13 is better

nah my commondore 64 is with 64k of ram or is that rom ? nyuk nyuk


regards john
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25-10-2008, 08:08 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,811
My Sinclair ZX81 tops that! Including cassette tape drive!

LOL!

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 25-10-2008, 09:58 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,425
geez i havent even learnt to use CS3 yet

Last edited by h0ughy; 25-10-2008 at 10:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 26-10-2008, 11:39 AM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis View Post
My Sinclair ZX81 tops that! Including cassette tape drive!

LOL!

Dennis
I had one of those !I agree!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 26-10-2008, 05:29 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Yes. It was my first personal computer too.

Came with 1kb RAM as standard...but you could splash out for a 16kb plug-in unit which was larger than a cigarette pack!

What a blast from the past. And it worked on BASIC.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 26-10-2008, 07:57 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
It was really satisfying when my 8Gb system "came alive" after I sourced then assembled the parts, then hit the "on" button and began loading V 64 ultimate. Ive got CS3, and it starts almost instantly. Pity CS4 is so expensive, $999 USD, which at the AUD could almost see it cost more then my PC!

Yes 8GB ram with Vista rocks, you cant kill it or even slow it down
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29-10-2008, 08:08 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33 View Post
It was really satisfying when my 8Gb system "came alive" after I sourced then assembled the parts, then hit the "on" button and began loading V 64 ultimate. Ive got CS3, and it starts almost instantly. Pity CS4 is so expensive, $999 USD, which at the AUD could almost see it cost more then my PC!

Yes 8GB ram with Vista rocks, you cant kill it or even slow it down
Scott
Yep - and that's just for the upgrade. The premium production suite here in Oz is nearly AU$2,800, and the whole shebang "Master Collection" is AU$4,100

To be fair, the thread is entitled "Photoshop CS4", which on its own (without the rest of the standard suite) is around the AU$1,150 mark, or AU$299 for the upgrade.

I agree that Vista 64 screams on a decent machine. Everything I do on mine is now almost instant. I've never seen Photoshop or Lightroom (22,000 images) fire up in two seconds from start before.

Last edited by Omaroo; 29-10-2008 at 08:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29-10-2008, 09:27 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by ving View Post
meh! psp 13 is better
If Paint Shop Pro does the job and you're happy, then that's all that counts.
I sometimes use PSP7 to do simple stuff, some of it's features are easier to use than PS and I love Animation Shop.

Can't wait to try CS4, I use CS3 but for some quick work I go into CS2 instead.

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29-10-2008, 10:04 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by ving View Post
meh! psp 13 is better
Uhmm... nope David! In the advertising/graphics trade I know of, well, there are no installations of PaintShop that I can put a finger on - except maybe a couple here and there which are used for conversion of PSP native files that come in on occasion to Photoshop. As Andrew says though - if it works for you and you're used to it then there's probably little need to go to full-hog Photoshop.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-12-2008, 12:37 PM
DJDD
Registered User

DJDD is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
Hey, all!

I belive a few of you may be using CS4 now so wonder what your thoughts are compared to CS3?

I am interested about its use for Astro work (when compared to CS3) but welcome thoughts on general use.

I have CS3 Extended Student Edition and was considering upgrading to CS4 Extended, again at Student prices.

cheers,
DJDD
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement